Ask HN: Would a startup sponsor my visa?
Are U.S. start-ups able/willing to help foreign (European) developers get an employment visa, or is this too much hassle for a smaller company? Have you done it in the past?
EDIT: I rephrased the question, as it was meant to be general. I myself am not going anywhere for at least 1 year. I am merely planning my career on a long-term basis during this weekend.
56 comments
[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 119 ms ] threadI'd like to be proved wrong, but these issues are deal breakers for me, which probably means I won't get to work in the US, except on short secondments.
I also believe - but am not sure - that once you have a visa that lets you work in the US, any current tourist visa you have is cancelled, making staying there when you're between jobs is a major undertaking (at least in my case, I think it means a trip back home and to the consulates here to get the visa changed, so that may not matter all that much.)
If you switch between jobs, you can start working for your new employer as soon as you've sent off the paperwork- you don't have to wait for them to process it (which can take many, many months). However, you cannot have a gap between jobs- your employment must be continuous.
But thanks for asking!
It may be somewhat easier at a company that's dealt with the process before, but most valley startups will have access to experienced immigration attorneys.
Have you spent five minutes to Google this?
* Excepting the premium processing fee, H1B holders can't pay for their own legal costs.
* H1B holders can be "passively" involved in other companies, including founding them, but cannot derive any benefit from them. (Confusing!)
You could work for a startup in the USA simply for wages, but that would be certifiably insane. The usual answer is to assign ownership to the investor(s) or American employees and have some arrangement whereby you'll get the benefits later, but that involves a degree of trust in investors that I don't have, personally.
See http://danashultz.com/blog/2011/05/06/can-i-get-an-h-1b-visa... , http://danashultz.com/blog/2011/01/18/visa-basics-for-foreig... .
There are ways to get around this, which are pretty similar to money laundering (look it up in a dictionary sometime). Some lawyers are willing to do this, others aren't. Be aware that a lawyer specializing in individual immigration cases is not going to jeopardize their relationship with the US Gov't just for you.
Also, even if you conceive of some scheme to get around this, be aware that startups are often very distracted. I tried to join one in the 90s, where a relative of mine was even the CEO, and the relationship was hot/cold for months. One week it was "yes, we're totally doing this!" and the next it was "um, not the right time, wait a month more!"
...why? It would just be like, y'know, having a job.
As long as you're getting decent pay I see no reason to stay in a miserable corporate job if you don't want to be in one.
* founding your own company and hiring yourself (especially if you do that on borrowed money it would make it too easy to immigrate)
* contractors (not sure why)
* job shop employees
The first item is where ownerships comes in. You're not allowed to be in control of the company, because you could prevent it from firing you. So that clearly rules out having >50% ownership.
However, I don't see how it rules out stock options for say 10% ownership? Particularly because, if I understand correctly, stock options don't give you any control until the company goes IPO.
The easiest way to find out: are there any startups that have given out stock option, without jumping through legal hoops?
I finally settled agreeing to work for 3 months unpaid internship, at the end of which I got my first job in Australia.
It ain't easy to wing it, so be ready to think outside the box.
After the internship some other option came up for me back home in Sweden so I never used my H-1B.
Note: This was not for a startup, but for an established company with HR and all that stuff. But the timing aspects should still apply I believe. As a side-note I eventually moved to Singapore, and getting an "employment pass" (equivalent to US H-1B) here was extremely smooth, comparing to all the work to get the H-1B for US.
There's a huge continuum between fledgling startup and entrenched multinational. There exist smaller multinationals where you can still have a huge impact.
A previous company I worked at sponsored somebody after their second round of funding.
The legal costs are fairly high, but we have been working with the 2 applicants for several months already, so I'm comfortable sponsoring them. I would not have done it based on a resume and job interviews alone.
I'd be happy to answer any questions if you need more details.
oh, and to address some of the other comments here, my understanding is that it's illegal for the applicant to pay for the legal costs.
Also, as employer we cannot underpay the applicant. Part of the application process requires us to disclose the salary offered and document prevailing wages for the same position in the same area. Should the salary offered be too low, the visa would be denied. (many requirements in the application process are designed to protect American jobs)
I have been trying to find a startup in NYC to work with but haven't found the right one yet.
Also, they/we did/do interviews through Skype, so no flights. Though interviews being convenient does not make them any easier :)
(ps: we are hireing: http://www.academia.edu/hiring)
From the employee side there's also risk, while you can switch jobs on an H1B it's not trivial and startups have a tendency to go under (luckily my current employer is kicking ass so my chances of an unemployment related deportation are very close to 0 but it still worries me at times). Having your company go under is never fun, that coupled with facing a deadline to find another job with visa related friction slowing the process down is not something I'd like to try.
On the upside working for a US startup is an amazing experience. Ireland has some hardy souls trying startups but it's like another planet over here. A lot more energy and enthusiasm around starting something new and people don't treat startups like a last ditch attempt at employment which is nice.
A H1B costs $8k max. A startup salary starts at $80K per year. Would you pay 10% of salary to get a good candidate? In this job market, in a heartbeat.
I would suggest that if you're planning for the long-term and want more job security, stay away from startups. Too much can wrong and you'll have too much too lose if they go belly-up and/or don't have people that can competently handle your immigration paperwork.
I moved from the UK to the USA in 2001. I came here on a J-1 visa (18 months), then got an H1-B (6 years) and finally got a green card through marriage. I worked for a federal government agencies - they were throwing H1-Bs at everyone and had a dedicated team for handling foreign/immigration issues. When I transferred from government work to 'Company B' their HR screwed up my immigration paperwork so bad that USCIS issued a deportation notice and I lost my job. Nightmare scenario given that I had a mortgage, and my partner was 7-months pregnant, commuting 10 hours a week, working F-T and finishing up her MBA.
Visas/immigration (and attorney fees) have been a pain in the rear for the last decade. I think I'll pay Uncle Sam the $700 just to become a citizen so I can sleep better...
Anyway, an E3 visa is actually MUCH easier to get than a H1B visa. For a H1B visa you have to "prove" that the job qualifies (Labor certification) and that you can't find anyone locally to do it. The first part is a formality (getting an LCA from the Department of Labor). The second is the hard and expensive part.
For an E3, you only need to do the first part.
So if you can't find people locally, consider employing Australians. I am curious on the cost and hassle of doing this from the employer's side too.
Anyone had any experience with this?
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-3_visa
I recently joined a startup and did all the leg-work myself, without a lawyer. The only thing the company needed to do was fill out an LCA, which I don't think has any fees associated with it. I then went to a US consulate in Canada, completed the visa interview, and made my way back into the US to begin work.
Thole process went smoothly for me - was there anything specific you wanted to ask?
What I am curious about is:
- How many startups know about the E3?
- How many would be willing to go through what seems like a lot less hassle of sponsoring an E3 (vs the far greater hassle of an H1B)?
- How much less hassle is it really?
I think this helped as I imagine the last thing a startup wants to waste time on is dealing with bureaucratic immigration issues, but I can't say for certain.
Once you explain that it is similar to the TN visa for hiring Canadians, most people are fairly relaxed about it.
I'm an Australian on my 3rd E3 visa, it is much much easier than an E3 for everyone involved from what I have heard from collegues. The first E3 visa I got was for a startup, and they got ripped off big time with a $5k 'expeditied processing' fee from their lawyer.
In reality all it costs is a few hundred in applications fees (at the consulate) and a trip to Australia. The paper work for the employer is free (LCA) and usually takes 10 days.
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f... If you want to see a count down for the 2012 quota
I've been told that most of those go to larger companies and that startups might find it harder to get them (this is anecdotal though)