Feeling burnt out from my 10x colleague, how to move on from this?
Part of why I have liked my job in the past is because I feel useful. I have a colleague that is so incredibly good and applies himself constantly (works after hours, weekends, during vacations). He writes at least 5x more code than me and its giving me an inferiority complex something fierce. How the heck do I break out of this mentality and become more productive? I feel like I am going off the rails and I often sit down to work and do nothing all day feeling this way. I don't want to end up on a PIP. Any suggestions are very welcome. Thanks!
18 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 44.1 ms ] threadOther people work so much because they are in an organization where it’s expected. And yet others work extra because they think it’s expected (when it may not be expected at all).
I wouldn’t assume the person needs an “intervention”, and frankly I don’t think it’s even appropriate unless it’s somehow detrimental to their well being or family.
> And if your bosses compare you to him in front of you, start job-hunting.
If the other guy delivers 10x the expectation and you deliver 0x the expectation, I don’t think the right decision is to just quit. IMO - get your productivity to what’s a sustainable, realistic level for you. If THAT is measured as 0, then the issue is yours to fix. Changing companies won’t resolve it. On the other hand, if you’re being forced to meet some bar set by some extraordinary individual - irrespective of their motivations for being 10x - then yes, the healthy choice is to find something else.
Op clearly said they have days where they produce basically nothing because they’re paralyzed thinking about others. Frankly that is ops problem to fix. Focus on yourself and tune out the noise.
If the environment is causing the 0x, then I would leave. The more likely thing is that they can do 1x, but 1x will start to look like .5x next to the 10x. When standards are vague and require subjective evaluation, there will be a lot of drift for what 1x looks like relative to the others.
Your question reminded me on an episode of Soft Skills Engineering where they answered basically the same question - https://softskills.audio/2018/08/20/episode-120-layoff-decis... - the relevant part starts at 19:57. It's a great podcast in general.
For example, you could do QA on his code to find bugs, write documentation, manage deployment, merge branches, write glue code etc. If you do this make sure you demand and get equal credit. If, as a consequence of your work, his productivity increases from 10x to 20x, then you are also a 10x colleague.
These are not good things. Ideally you should want to ship as many features with as little code as possible, more parts mean more ways it can break. Working nights and weekends isn't good either, the schedule or scope need changed if people feel that's necessary. Please don't work during vacations barring emergencies, there's nothing good that comes out of that.
I worked with someone like that too, and even though I'm pretty sure we made about the same, I made a lot more hour-for-hour, and my boss found my work perfectly satisfactory. He got more accolades, but I got more time with my family and friends. He also took more time than he thought to get things done, which deteriorated the situation further for him. I hope he's happy at the role he moved on to.
In the face of something like this, I'd maximize my reliability. Sure you'll ship fewer features, but make sure you finish the stuff you start when you say you will, and make sure it absolutely is tested, documented, and functional.
Hope that helped!
I was working for a company and employees there were working for long hours and weekends. Managers too were doing the same. It was sort of a badge of honour that an employee is working beyond the office hours and also on weekends. It was the culture of the company. Then one day the managers were sent to a workshop on how to identify talent, increase productivity and build a more happy culture.
When they came back from the workshop, a strict dictat was passed that no one will be in the office for more than 8 hours and no work on weekends. So one day I asked one of the managers, why the sudden change? what has changed? And he replied, in the workshop they attended the speakers there said, if an employee is working long hours and working on weekends then either the employee is incompetent, has no ability to delegate or the company has serious problem of allocating tasks to people so that one person is not overloaded with work. This amounts to burnout, sets wrong example to other employees and overtime decreases productivity. All this is not good for the company and the employees.
So, this comparison of 10x with "works after hours, weekends, during vacations" is wrong on so many levels.