I know it's possible to detect incognito testing for specific APIs and browser behaviour, but it's a very brittle method as every new browser version changes something here and there. Anyway I've never encountered a website doing such a thing. Perhaps I'm unknowingly blocking the gatekeeping scripts. Also why prohibit incognito browsing? Cookies?
I get a security warning for bad cert domain when I visit that in Firefox but not in Chrome, odd, probably just a difference in default handling behavior for a particular case.
Please let's not kid ourselves. Propaganda will work on most populations. Somewhat better in places where literacy is low, but it can absolutely take hold anywhere.
There are useful idiots in every population ready to tattoo themselves with some thing either political, ideological, or even commercial.
Populations are not good at context - we take some tiny, possibly insignificant effect, like the utterance of a leader etc. and make all sorts of giant assumptions about it. Sometimes the issue is serious but we still contextualize it.
We also tend to ignore major material issues unless someone is creating a fuss and making a narrative about it.
19 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 56.4 ms ] threadThe NK Pro, NK News and KCNA Watch websites do not support private mode or incognito browsing.
Sadly he'd probably get banned like Trump's account.
No fun allowed.
"NK cuisine be bussin and Kim Jong Un got that drip! He yeeted the cringe imperialist pigs out of here!"
There are useful idiots in every population ready to tattoo themselves with some thing either political, ideological, or even commercial.
Populations are not good at context - we take some tiny, possibly insignificant effect, like the utterance of a leader etc. and make all sorts of giant assumptions about it. Sometimes the issue is serious but we still contextualize it. We also tend to ignore major material issues unless someone is creating a fuss and making a narrative about it.