Ask HN: How scared should a new grad be of the possible economic downturn?
I have been trying to do build my own thing, but against my research advisor's advise I was working alone, and things did not turn out that well. Also I have not started looking for jobs, and am a bit lethargic to do so.
I have six more months left before I need to get a full-time job (visa regulations). Should I get shit-scared and start looking for one right away. Or can I wait a little longer. My friends tell me that there is a big hiring boom in general in SV, and even in the worst of economic times (2008-09), tech hiring did not ease substantially. I am not sure if that would be true, especially in the startup world.
So what is HN's advise?
Background: I have never worked in the industry, but have published a couple of research papers, and have created some real user facing, moderately popular stuff, while in the university.
20 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 56.8 ms ] threadWorst case, pimp yourself out as a generic Python programmer or something like that. Companies have been having a tough time finding competent employees. But ML & NLP is a very nice hammer to be swinging; you can probably find something interesting to work on if you start ASAP.
The world runs on computers. People who can make them sit up and beg are not going to stop being in demand any time soon.
Thanks for the reply.
I wouldn't quite say that unemployment is something that happens to other people, but that's damn near the case for competent engineers if you put even a bit of effort into networking and self-marketing.
Either I am not reading it properly, or you probably missed a word or two. But I wanted to confirm the gist of what you are saying here- it's that the vicious cycle of being left alone (after being laid off etc.) is one of the primary reasons why some competent engineers stay unemployed.
Finding an ideal position is harder, but I don't doubt that you can find something to solve your visa issue.
Also it was very interesting to see the wide range of comments from every one else. Thanks for that as well.
But, you will have 0% problem finding a job that pays decently, even if it is not interesting I think it should be able to tide over your visa requirements until you can find something nice.
In short; there is a much much higher demand for people with your skills than people to fill those positions so you are in a fine spot.
Also a related question to anybody who cares to answer. How often do people doing startups get scared or strongly discouraged. Is it much less often when working in a team. And the kind of well-knit team induced self-delusion which helps in hardships, also results in insularity which lead to the final downfalls- the kind we are seeing with RIM co-founders for instance.
There are ups an downs. It's easy to get discouraged - and sometimes, you should be. The success ratio for startups is not very high. But the startup environment has a lot of perks, like working on interesting problems with highly enthusiastic people. Teams help, as does remembering to actually get out of the lab occasionally.
I'm not just talking out of my arse. I still remember getting that first job, and showing them that I had done things was a HUGE part of that.
I've also been in on interviews for dozens of candidates, and the ones that showed code were always much more likely to impress us. Without code, we had to guess how much you understood, and how much you were bluffing. Code doesn't lie.
But to talk about the value of real code, the impression I get by looking at my friends, almost all big SV companies care about are how fast you can answer the almost cookie-cutter questions which can be culled from a number of forums. I know people had interns at MSR and pretty good publications but were rejected over those who semi-memorized those questions, but had almost nothing else to show off. Shameful process, which is partly the thing that puts me off.
Also to talk about the bluff. How can peer-reviewed research at decent venues be considered bluff. Or if you have contributed something which can be accessed by anyone, is visibly used by many, but is not on Github, how is that a bluff?
Is it only because you (as a recruiter) do not know what concrete contribution you (candidate) had in that specific effort? If that's the only thing, should not the right reference sort that out?
According to WSJ, the unemployment rate for computer programmers (5.7%) is much lower than many professions, such as construction workers (~20%).
According to BLS, the unemployment rate for college grads is 5.4%; for Master's is 4%.
Sources: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870379190457607... http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_chart_001.htm