I did a year of college and dropped out and began my career at 20. It’s definitely possible to have a good career as a software engineer without it, but it definitely put me at a disadvantage in some situations. Only one time that I explicitly know of professionally but it also caused some problems with feeling insecure.
If you’ve already gotten a job at FB just make sure the offer isn’t contingent on completion of degree and you’re probably fine. But be aware there might come a time where you’d wished you had finished.
I dropped out, went back to do a MBA part time (while working full time) about 10 years later because almost all director level positions I was looking at required it. It was hard work, but it worked out for me.
I have a similar story; I finished about 1.5 years at FSU, and due to a lack of motivation and depression (and the two feeding into each other), I decided to drop out when I was 21. I was extremely lucky to find work as a software engineer really quickly, and I managed to piece together a pretty awesome career making a pretty reasonable salary, but there's been several occasions where not having a degree made my life measurably worse.
Since then, nine years after dropping out, I managed to complete my degree at WGU (which has its own share of valid criticisms). I don't know if the degree will "help" me more than my experience has, but at elast it's one less inferiority complex I have to deal with.
Yeah. I could go back and finish (though I’d guess I would be starting from scratch now), but I’m now at a level where it doesn’t matter.
It would be so weird to be taking English classes with a bunch of 18 year olds just to add a line item to my resume nobody would read anyways.
I’ve had times where it felt like I had to work harder, but I think a lot of that was self imposed and working hard is important in being a good software engineer anyways.
You can go on the CSCareerQuestions subreddit and see many posts from people who did the bare minimum and have CS degrees with no idea how to get into the industry.
If you just want a nominal degree, you might check out either WGU [1] or Northern Arizona University [2]. The competency-based system allows you to get through the courses a lot quicker (and cheaper) than you would with a traditional school (both are fully accredited).
I don't know that it's "worth it", since that expression can mean different things to different people. For me, I want to unlock the path to do research, and a bachelors is basically required for that for most jobs. I also just wanted to get that chip off my shoulder (as stated before).
I'm doing a CS degree at WGU after 12 years in the industry. It's relatively cheap and being competency based means I could pass classes like "programming 101" - the class that teach you how a while loop works - I passed that class in one day. The ability to go as fast as I'm able removed the main reason I never went back to school, and once I learned I could go as fast, I decided to go back to school. I have learned some things in the program and don't consider it a complete waste of time, although it has its share of classes I'm not enthusiastic about, just like any school would. I'll be able to move onto a masters program if I ever decide, that is an important part to me.
I wish an online competency based school would offer math degrees. Math has many good resources for self study, and is easy to test for competency, it seems like a perfect fit. Anyone know of a good online math degree?
I don't regret doing WGU, it's an accredited school, it opened some doors for me, it's relatively cheap, it's a good investment.
I do have some issues with the curriculum; for example, there's two classes on "business of IT" stuff, but no classes on distributed/concurrent programming or (more worryingly) linear algebra. I think the latter is much more of an issue; a ton of jobs in the compsci world really necessitate a working knowledge of linear algebra (at least enough to call a CUDA library), so the fact that they don't teach any math after Discrete Math II is a bad thing (enough to where I wrote a letter to their staff complaining about it).
I do think that an issue with the competency-based systems is that they do kind of incentivize you to half-ass your way through the degree. An 80% is the same thing as a 100% in regards to your GPA, so I felt like I would very often learn just enough to pass a class and move on. For me, as someone with almost a decade of experience and a somewhat autodidactical nature, I don't think that's bad since I already have a fairly good understanding of compsci, but I do worry that a newbie might not leave with an great understanding of some fairly vital information.
I'm doing a masters degree in Data Analytics now from WGU, and since I know almost nothing about that subject, I've been fighting every urge to do "turbo mode" for it, since I actually want to learn the subject matter.
I agree, although being able to get through a degree without the ability to apply your knowledge is a problem with many schools, even top schools, not just WGU.
That's true, and in fairness it's not like any degree is "complete". Yes, you learn facts and information, but ideally a good university "teaches you how to learn". It's there to give you a framework and enough information so that you can teach yourself, and I suppose in that sense, WGU does a pretty good job with that.
Yep. I graduated in the top ten of my high school, had a full scholarship to the state university, and already had about a year's worth of college credits from AP classes. I made it one semester. Too much instant freedom discovering drugs and parties. I should not have lived in the dorms. After a ten year gap year and years of professional experience I am now finishing up my degree.
Yep, I developed a love for coding when I'd already squandered my attempt at tertiary education, and had a young son and wife who'd developed a belief that women shouldn't work, to support.
So I wasn't able to go back to university, so I'm self-taught, although I sat (and passed) a few first year papers via correspondence. Later on I took second year papers part-time to cover gaps I'd identified in my knowledge of computer science.
But it was very hard to get an interview with no degree. I had a portfolio of code I'd written for people freelance, but even getting people to look at it was near impossible. I was rejected several times with reasons along the lines of "self-taught devs write unstructured/bad/spaghetti code", which annoyed me when they wouldn't look at my portfolio.
In the end, I got an interview via a friend of a colleague who was a stealth developer in the call centre I worked in. He was desperate to learn JS, so I taught him, and consequently he recommended me to his friend.
Who, luckily for me, worked for a company founded by a developer who was also self-taught and sans degree, so he gave me a chance to prove myself.
13 years later, my lack of degree doesn't concern anyon
But, 5 years to get an interview, and in the first 5 years, I was really worried what would happen if the company downsized and I had to find another job.
I think this is a bad idea. The author is clearly self motivated, so why does he want to start a full-time dev career so early? College is basically the best time in most people's lives to explore ideas that they have. College students are smart enough to build something significant, and have enough time to do so. I know so many people who have atrophied motivationally at Facebook and other big tech companies. The ones that haven't devolved into general apathy are more focused on climbing the corporate ladder or making more money, not anything truly fun and inspirational. Personally, I would love the opportunity to go back to college and have the time I need to explore my ideas.
For the last couple of years the "best time in most people's lives" has been paying $40K for the professor to shuffle through years-old powerpoint decks over Zoom. It's hard to find anyone graduating today who isn't fully disillusioned with the college system.
No, but at least people are now realizing the absurdity of the whole situation. Plus there were at least other benefits of college outside of lecture halls that are no longer available.
I can't speak for Facebook, but I definitely feel like Apple made me stagnate intellectually. It didn't help that every time I wanted to work on something open source, I would get a nastygram from their legal team telling me that doing so would be grounds for termination.
That said, at least for me, college required a type of stick-with-it-ness that I don't really feel I obtained until having to sludge through horrible office jobs for years. Having to work for megacorps that I hated forced me to finish work that I didn't want to do, and trudge through meetings I didn't have any desire to go to. After the hundredth "glorified data entry" assignment and thousandth "sprint planning that I'm only relevant for two minutes of", pushing my way through college felt somewhat easy in comparison.
My path would be virtually impossible to recommend to people, but I honestly wouldn't change the order of how I did things given the option.
Perhaps a taste of the working world will give them a greater understanding/appreciation of what college will offer if they decide to go back. A lot of people waste their college years cause they simply went cause it was what you do.
> I think this is a bad idea. The author is clearly self motivated, so why does he want to start a full-time dev career so early? College is basically the best time in most people's lives to explore ideas that they have. College students are smart enough to build something significant, and have enough time to do so.
What does this have to do with actually going to college? If the degree and courses don't matter, it sounds like OP would be better off just not working for a couple years in a sort of "pre career sabbatical". If you're going to dedicate your time to exploring ideas without an income, you might as well not waste your time on useless classes and accrue unnecessary debt.
Must be extraordinary to hop to New York City for a month, then fly to SFO as a young person, with not a (mentioned) care in the world about running out of money.
With the above context, I think we can agree the risks for this person is low. If things go badly there's a landing spot.
Yeah, I'm not sure what "risk" this person is taking. They can afford to move around the country while not working, plus they already have an offer from Facebook (which would likely be > $100k) for employment.
I want to chime in with a bit less negativity. Universities can really be a bit behind on CS compared to industry, and it's really hard to teach a lot of the practical stuff. You can absolutely get a lot more out of industry experience than school in that field, and the author seems well posed to do that with their intrinsic motivation to do this stuff.
All the information is online these days. Universities are good at teaching things for two things: they guide you through the field in the right order and teach you what's important, and there's someone pushing you to do your work with deadlines and such. (Of course the value of universities is not just in the teaching/learning bit.) If you have the motivation for 2, and you have a good guide/job to do 1, then a unviersity might not offer you as much value.
Appreciate the positivity! I'm definitely grateful for the first two years at university; I wouldn't be where I am now without them! Like you say though, now I feel like I have (1) and (2) covered, so I'm not getting the same amount of value anymore :/
Have to say this because I've seen this attitude become pathological: You don't have to be "killing it" all the time. There's no rush. Time isn't running out.
Finish school. Slow down. Think about what you want to do.
I'm not sure what to think about dropping out of college to spend $4-$7k on a course about writing? That is definitely getting up to the level, at least, of what some college courses would cost.
As far as dropping out just generally goes ... what's the rush? Especially if you're close to being done in any case? People shouldn't write off the utility of the credential itself, regardless of their own personal feelings on the subject.
You don't understand! Their website uses fancy German fonts and neon color gradients, clearly they know what they're doing. And check that out, I can pay my $7,000 tuition via Apple Pay! Be right back, I'm going to go cancel the rest of my semester.
Unironically, the whole system to pay tuition has awful UX.
The main benefits of the course that I see are:
- focus on writing online, they make you make a personal website, they give you advice for twitter, medium, etc
- community--people here are much cooler than average college students, they are successful, interesting, connected, and experienced in writing online and are more than willing to share their advice
- there are no grades, which allows me to optimize my time how I want
Idk. I am skeptical but I wish you luck! All I would say is (speaking from direct experience here), just be sure in your own mind that you are not just taking the external validation you would receive through college and proxying it with something else like "another course". There are lots of paid courses out there -- some are good and some are bad, but none of them can approximate the experience of working on a problem yourself first.
With respect to writing specifically, there is no magic bullet. Writing takes practice and learning some tricks to optimize your own workflow. You could, after all, practice that in your spare time and stay in school :) Don't quit a program just to do things you could have done while staying in.
Buried towards the bottom of the essay is the fact that the author has accepted a full time offer from Facebook. So yeah, the last year of college (and a degree stamp) is meaningless as long as he plans to stay in the tech world.
Agreed -- the use of the word college (instead of university), high school (instead of secondary or cegep), and a few other cues suggest he probably didn't grow up in Canada.
LinkedIn shows the author went to high school in New York. Are you sure they are Canadian?
I have heard the TN visa for Canadians allows you to substitute something like 3 years of work experience for 1 year equivalency of a college education.
It's probably a fair assumption, though! McGill has around 10% from the US and another 17% of admissions based on high school attended [1]. I have met Americans at other Canadian universities that have dual citizenship, so would be considered Canadians for tuition, but would be considered American from the high school.
There is not. We looked into this for my Canadian now-wife. If you have no college degree, basically your only immigration options in that case are a work transfer visa, entirely up to the whim of your current employer, or the K1 fiancée to Green Card marriage path. That's it.
Sometimes these offers are contingent on getting the degree, as a way to get an intern or low level employee then get them to senior after they graduate.
This person will get a rude awakening when they need to go the next step and realize "almost a degree" isn't really a degree.
"I realize that I’m in the final stretch of college now, but I just can’t bear to waste another second bogged down by things my brain screams are irrelevant when I think (dare I say know) I can replicate everything college can give and hopefully more."
I had to double check that this was no satire, as this is remarkably ignorant. Ironically it demonstrates that no, Simon does not "know", what a classical general education is and what it is supposed to provide, specifically when delivered in an environment that considers academic knowledge and research as valuable as ends, not means.
Dear Simon, a four year education at a credible institution is neither about resume-packing skills nor partying to build a network...
I can't decide if such misplaced self confidence is more demonstrative of generic individual hubris based on no actual world experience,
or an indictment of the conversion over the last decades of four-year college education into a de facto half-million-dollar glorified boot camp,
> Simon does not "know", what a classical general education is and what it is supposed to provide
This still raises the question: is the education Simon is getting at McGill actually providing this? I strongly suspect the answer is "no", since almost no college now actually provides what a "classical general education" is supposed to provide. Particularly if one is getting a CS degree. That's a specific credential for a specific career path, and the education that comes with it is focused on that.
> an environment that considers academic knowledge and research as valuable as ends, not means.
This again raises the question: is any college now actually such an environment? Certainly the governments that pay for the research don't view it as an end, they view it as a means. After decades of that system, that attitude has percolated down to the professors and students.
> [...] what would be the use of credentials issued by a university thousands of miles away that still taught PHP for web development? Would success in the far more complex task of building startups from the ground up not be credential enough? [...]
I'm reminded of the recent post about the 22 year old who said they had failed: "Your mistake was thinking you could go into, say, a CS degree and have nothing to learn."[0]
Of course, dropping out and starting a career at FB (or similar) is hardly a bad move. Who can say if it's the right thing to do or not? It's hard to discern a positive motive, though, when 95% of the reasoning is why college isn't great, and the bit about Facebook or throwing startup ideas at the wall to see what sticks barely passes as a footnote. Generally the best decisions don't come from focussing on what you don't want to do.
This is what I think my father must have meant when he said, "I hope you never visit SF because if you do you'll never leave."
If I were 21ish and had gotten this far, I absolutely would have made this choice, and it absolutely (for me) would have been the wrongest choice I could have made in that moment.
The credential matters, and is worth 10 fold the value of that checked box on interview applications. To the people whose opinion Simon likely cares about, it proves you can stick with something that's unpleasant long enough to see it through to completion. Completing college (or not, as it's something I haven't done) sticks with you in conversations, in social interactions, and in the minds of others.
If you ever want to do anything besides bootstrap your own startup all the way to product/market fit (not as easy as you possibly think right now), not finishing college will create a little nugget of, if not doubt, then "prove it now" mentality in the heads of the people whose opinions you care about (both professionally e.g. investors and personally e.g. friends).
If you're 20 or 21, your primary advantage is time. You do have the time to finish up college, and then do all of these things. You can do both, and pretending like you can't is just giving in to that underdeveloped prefrontal cortex.
Simon, I hope I'm wrong, but this is a mistake. You will regret this.
The credential matters – until you get your first job. A few years from now no employer (at least in tech) is going to reject him for not having a college degree when he has "Software Engineer at Facebook" on his resume.
I was recently looking to switch jobs and actually removed the "education" section from my resume because it was taking too much space. Prospective employers care much more about work experience and other relevant projects than the college courses you took a decade ago.
This has also been my experience. Without a degree, finding people interested in your CV is pretty tough. Once I started citing some previous contract work though, things started to open up. It's obviously no replacement for a degree, but I guess most people just want another party to vouch for your credibility.
True, until you attempt to move into an officer position at a company. It's a requirement for every organization I've spoken to or with colleagues about, both large companies and at startups.
For very early stage startups, or if you're a cofounder, that's different. The further into in a company's lifetime, the more required it is, in my experience. In other words, it's a barrier to some things.
Not to say that it's everyone's path, but I don't think everyone realizes that there is a ceiling, and it does not get easier to obtain an undergraduate degree than it is if you're 20 and have already completed three years worth of the program.
What is an "officer position"? I work at a large tech company (and have worked at several others, including Microsoft) and several of my directors, VPs and equivalent have had no formal degree. This is common when employees rise through the ranks or come in via acquisitions.
Companies aren't going to ask for college transcripts when offering you a promotion. What matters is your experience and performance, that's it.
A VP is an officer (a director is not), and I've worked with people who were asked for exactly those things when interviewing or being considered for such a promotion, both internally and interviewing for a role externally.
I agree that what you say about experience and performance should be the only thing that matters, but it's naive to think that's simply "true", with no caveats, qualifications, or exceptions.
I don't think it's as common as you think as you progress in your career beyond an individual contributor, generally in the tech industry, and specifically at Microsoft I'm 75% sure what you're saying is not the case, with a very small handful of exceptions.
Another aspect to consider: this is all a very US-centric view. In the UK, getting hired without a degree is not impossible (I did it) but very difficult, and some processes will simply filter you out. Large employers like IBM want a 2.2 equivalent degree from a good-ish university, doesn't matter what, and you can potentially go and work for them. Even FAANG, those that are here, e.g. Google, Amazon, Facebook, will primarily recruit people with degrees.
Ditching the degree will also make it harder to move abroad if you want to in the future, since most immigration formalities evaluate education level. This is definitely true when it comes to emigrating _into_ the US, for example.
Also, if you ever decide you need to go back to university (school) to learn about something in the future, I don't know about the US, but in Europe, a condition of entry to masters programmes is always holding a bachelors degree. So if you have to go back to school here, likely you'll be going back to bachelors level. I don't even know how valuable your existing credits would be - I can tell you that they tend to expire in the EU.
So, there are some consequences to this choice. I'm not judging, each to their own, but if it were me, I'd say life isn't a race and unless you are already sat on a potential unicorn and it 'has to be now' Bill-Gates-style, a couple more years while you finish your degree is nothing.
Kid's being dumb, especially if he was at McGill and is Canadian. e.g. Have fun getting a US work visa to work with all those cool people without finishing your undergrad. The friction from the same degree/visa issue cuts you out of taking jobs in Europe. Any company bigger than a startup that has an actual HR department won't give you P&L responsibility because if something goes wrong they are exposed to the accusation you weren't objectively qualified, and even though it's bullshit, it will keep him out of most management roles, and reduce his bargaining position on every job he does. Even if he fails and uses his tech skills to take a government job, he's going to spend his life working for (and likely antagonizing) the long tail of people who only barely graduated, and that was their high water mark. This isn't 1995 where you can "learn computers" and become a valuable asset. Most of the skills he has, he is - or will - be competing against offshore shops, and even against them, he will be competing globally against people who have mobility between countries (facilitated by degrees) to enter and leave his market as they please, with a lot more talent and leverage. When he wants to go do a quick masters in something he finds interesting, he's also shut out, even if he could probably teach anything he becomes interested in.
Maybe he does a series of startups and one hits. Maybe he's lucky, or brilliant, but the opportunity cost of 4 years in your early 20s is insignificant compared to the same time in your 30s and later. The feeling of this kid's parents isn't sadness or disappointment in foregone dreams, it's awe at how stupid he is being while still managing to dress and feed himself unassisted.
Dear Kid - you're making a staggeringly poor quality decision, go back to school.
This is really interesting observation. Much like the author, I also dropped out partway through a degree to do startups. Boy was I surprised when I (US citizen) was stopped by Canadian immigration and asked to show my degree when I was arriving in Vancouver, BC for a meeting. This was in 1998. I later finished my degree thanks to Apple's then generous at the time support. I feel that I valued the education more as an older adult, but I also wish I had just completed my degree earlier, as it was a lot of work completing a degree and working full-time.
However, be suspicious of anyone who hires you. It's very difficult to tell if we are smart or just easily manipulated by people who tell us we are. (hint: if you aren't already rich, seriously evaluate the likelihood of the latter) The time it takes to go back and finish your degree after you are 30 can work out to a few hundred thousand dollars in deferred wages/opportunity cost, meaning you aren't going to do it because it's not worth it, and you're going to be under that ceiling for good unless you find a way to really build wealth.
There is zero cost to you spending another couple years in school right now, especially if you are FB level talent. It's all there waiting for you.
Drop out to run a profitable company, never drop out for just a job, especially a fancy one. Prestige is what they offer you when it's not worth it.
My most recent job (for a well established fintech company) actually verified my diploma with my university, and even asked me to correct a small, related detail i had mistakenly put on my resume! This kid will get background checked some day and start regretting this.
The kid, unless he is very stupid, won't falsely claim to have graduated. They don't background check you on things that you don't claim.
That said, I wonder if a university will confirm a partially completed degree. If not, it becomes something that rounds down to zero at anywhere that takes background checking seriously.
Hmm. I never got background checked. But I would also never put anything false. Honestly, you only have one life and university is a significant part of it. It has nothing to do with your job - nothing at all. A few decades down the line this will be clear.
I think its okay to drop out because you have your own ideas you are excited to work on. You can always go back to school and finish your degree if you need it for a visa.
Don't drop out and work for FB though. I can tell you are fired up and excited to do things - but big corporations like FB will suck you dry and you will get nothing in return.
A common thread in these endless discussions is what a shallow and reductive view the pro-dropout people have of university. This guy thinks the biggest dig against McGill is that they teach web development (!) with an old stack, and he "knows" that he can "replicate everything that college can give and hopefully more".
I hope Facebook can pay this kid in Dunning-Krugerrands.
What a lot of early dropouts don't seem to realize is that the normal university experience in is very tail-loaded towards the tough, interesting courses. You can blitz through a couple years of basics and fume about how slow stuff is, or that the Intro Programming is in the "Wrong Language (TM)", but most of what I remember being good were 300- and 400-level courses. As you specialize, you also pick up a lot of these courses, relatively speaking.
There's also a lot to be said for, I dunno, all the other courses that you could be doing at a university for intellectual breadth. It's not a vocational school.
Oh well, he has a starter job at a tech company, which will probably be for life. That's how that works, right?
Man, nobody gives people the benefit of the doubt on the internet huh :(
Sorry if my comment on PHP was in poor taste, but it was more of an easy rag than the crux of my argument. I do standby that most CS courses that are supposed to be "practical" teach outdated material (at least at McGill), but of course there are exceptions (e.g. I used ZooKeeper in my distributed systems course).
I do think that I do a decent job in my essay explaining how I can fulfill the three reasons people go to college by myself, so I think that merits more of a response than a mocking quote (if I'm reading the tone right).
For the record, I took several 500 level courses (along with 300-400 level courses) and although I did learn a good amount, I still think that my time would have been better spent elsewhere.
Also for the record, I took several psychology and philosophy courses where I liked the content but felt the professors/TAs tried to shoehorn me into some method of thinking and take it out on my grades when they disagreed with my essays. I will gladly read the same content on my own time and discuss it with other interested people.
Follow your dreams, but after you get the degree. A degree now days primarily is a signifier of two things: you have the the patience and discipline to stick through it and do well, and you are able to conform. The biggest benefits conferred by a degree are the networking you will do while at a good college, and being able to pass hiring gatekeeper checklists. This is doubly so if you plan on doing any kind of research.
There are still places that will block you if you do not have a degree. The person that does it is an initial screener that is just looking at a checklist and nothing more. This probably (possibly?) does not apply if you have software engineer at a FAANG company on your resume.
Who am I to comment? I basically did this, but went the corporate route. I dropped out to work in the corporate world, rather than startups. For family reasons I am unable to move to SV or NYC. After a career spanning 25 years I am making roughly $180k salary, not counting benefits, in Maryland.
I have worked my rear off to get there, and I am in the process of going back to get my bachelors...because there are positions where the division head has to sign a waiver for me to be hired to the project in that position, because I do not have a degree.
There is a caveat..I am in a somewhat degree-obsessed are, defense consulting. Still, I urge the OP to reconsider.
There are a lot of comments here that echo my sentiment.
Simon, I am a Canadian founder. I got my first job offer in the US (San Francisco) at 25 years old. I took it right away. It was not FAANG, though I was interviewed there many times: not once was I given an offer. My degree was in Biochemistry, not CS. I probably would have been over the moon to get an offer from FB. So I can understand how you feel.
However; I think you should consider finishing your degree. The job offer from Facebook will always be around -- or some equivalent. If you can get that at 20/21 you can get it at 21/22. The only time where I'd recommend somebody drop out is if they're committed to a project that is either clearly a business or has the potential to be one and they're pursuing entrepreneurship. I know a number of founders that have pursued this route and are quite successful. That said; college is really a once-in-a-lifetime experience. I wouldn't trade my time in college for anything, even though coming to Silicon Valley at 25 years old made me feel ancient. If you focus your last year on personal growth, hacking, friends, your network, building relationships - both at McGill and around Silicon Valley - you'll be even more set up to succeed post-graduation.
Re: the FB offer. The ugly truth you're glossing over is that working at FAANG can -- for many -- ultimately be just as boring as coursework in college. If you want to get into startups and like the energy surrounding them, my recommendation is use your last year of college to (1) kick college's ass and get that degree so immigration is easier and (2) start a badass side project.
That's my $0.02 but YMMV. Shoot me a DM on Twitter if you feel like chatting.
For me, the most important thing that college did is force me to study a bunch of stuff that I did not want to study. I never would have learned about philosophy or linguistics or advanced math were it not for university.
In many cases I learned helpful things and gained an appreciation for subjects and people outside of my bubble.
As someone who also dropped out, I think college will always be there for Simon. You go to college to become employable. I learned far more on the job than in school—and dropping out didn't hinder me becoming a good engineer—it expedited it.
Go back to college when you're older and then study something you'll appreciate learning. Hungry kids like this who want to start making stuff in the real world should do just that.
An undergraduate degree won't teach you to be a good engineer any more than it will teach you to be a good executive, or dentist, or doctor. It's why Waterloo's co-op program is almost universally regarded as the best training in the industry. I'm not surprised working in the industry expedited your growth as an engineer and it's a shame more schools don't adopt Waterloo's model. I have plenty of complaints about academia in general, but that's for a different thread. :)
The argument here is primarily that college is a unique experience that you don't really get to go back to and, in this specific case, the investment remaining is minimal. I can wax poetic about socialization and being young and a whole load of other things, but college is really just what you make of it. It is entirely within somebody's power to make their last remaining year of college enjoyable in the same way they have the capacity to make their first year in the workforce enjoyable.
Simon can do whatever he likes. The wonderful thing about his situation is that there are no bad options. That's when decisions are truly difficult, when you're maximizing EV between things that have unpredictable upside. I'd say -- from a pure EV perspective -- the downside of not having a degree (likely permanent) exceeds the upside of starting in the work force 8mo early (job offer effectively fungible, just have to wait 8mo). The scenario in which this would flip would be if the upside was an order of magnitude or more larger; like double-digit early equity in a promising company with traction that's starting YC.
This kids a middle management wet dream for easy abuse labor. Is willing to drop out of secure education for in-secure work. No long term fin capital from years worked to weather a rough employment period. No further education tickets to class him as a threat to taking managements jobs.
Basically lining himself up to be a slave to the system.... He will make a good cog in the machine.
93 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 186 ms ] threadIf you’ve already gotten a job at FB just make sure the offer isn’t contingent on completion of degree and you’re probably fine. But be aware there might come a time where you’d wished you had finished.
Since then, nine years after dropping out, I managed to complete my degree at WGU (which has its own share of valid criticisms). I don't know if the degree will "help" me more than my experience has, but at elast it's one less inferiority complex I have to deal with.
It would be so weird to be taking English classes with a bunch of 18 year olds just to add a line item to my resume nobody would read anyways.
I’ve had times where it felt like I had to work harder, but I think a lot of that was self imposed and working hard is important in being a good software engineer anyways.
You can go on the CSCareerQuestions subreddit and see many posts from people who did the bare minimum and have CS degrees with no idea how to get into the industry.
I don't know that it's "worth it", since that expression can mean different things to different people. For me, I want to unlock the path to do research, and a bachelors is basically required for that for most jobs. I also just wanted to get that chip off my shoulder (as stated before).
[1] https://www.wgu.edu/ [2] https://nau.edu/online-innovative-educational-initiatives/se...
I wish an online competency based school would offer math degrees. Math has many good resources for self study, and is easy to test for competency, it seems like a perfect fit. Anyone know of a good online math degree?
I do have some issues with the curriculum; for example, there's two classes on "business of IT" stuff, but no classes on distributed/concurrent programming or (more worryingly) linear algebra. I think the latter is much more of an issue; a ton of jobs in the compsci world really necessitate a working knowledge of linear algebra (at least enough to call a CUDA library), so the fact that they don't teach any math after Discrete Math II is a bad thing (enough to where I wrote a letter to their staff complaining about it).
I do think that an issue with the competency-based systems is that they do kind of incentivize you to half-ass your way through the degree. An 80% is the same thing as a 100% in regards to your GPA, so I felt like I would very often learn just enough to pass a class and move on. For me, as someone with almost a decade of experience and a somewhat autodidactical nature, I don't think that's bad since I already have a fairly good understanding of compsci, but I do worry that a newbie might not leave with an great understanding of some fairly vital information.
I'm doing a masters degree in Data Analytics now from WGU, and since I know almost nothing about that subject, I've been fighting every urge to do "turbo mode" for it, since I actually want to learn the subject matter.
So I wasn't able to go back to university, so I'm self-taught, although I sat (and passed) a few first year papers via correspondence. Later on I took second year papers part-time to cover gaps I'd identified in my knowledge of computer science.
But it was very hard to get an interview with no degree. I had a portfolio of code I'd written for people freelance, but even getting people to look at it was near impossible. I was rejected several times with reasons along the lines of "self-taught devs write unstructured/bad/spaghetti code", which annoyed me when they wouldn't look at my portfolio.
In the end, I got an interview via a friend of a colleague who was a stealth developer in the call centre I worked in. He was desperate to learn JS, so I taught him, and consequently he recommended me to his friend.
Who, luckily for me, worked for a company founded by a developer who was also self-taught and sans degree, so he gave me a chance to prove myself.
13 years later, my lack of degree doesn't concern anyon
But, 5 years to get an interview, and in the first 5 years, I was really worried what would happen if the company downsized and I had to find another job.
Not to mention the imposter syndrome feeling.
I can't speak for Facebook, but I definitely feel like Apple made me stagnate intellectually. It didn't help that every time I wanted to work on something open source, I would get a nastygram from their legal team telling me that doing so would be grounds for termination.
That said, at least for me, college required a type of stick-with-it-ness that I don't really feel I obtained until having to sludge through horrible office jobs for years. Having to work for megacorps that I hated forced me to finish work that I didn't want to do, and trudge through meetings I didn't have any desire to go to. After the hundredth "glorified data entry" assignment and thousandth "sprint planning that I'm only relevant for two minutes of", pushing my way through college felt somewhat easy in comparison.
My path would be virtually impossible to recommend to people, but I honestly wouldn't change the order of how I did things given the option.
What does this have to do with actually going to college? If the degree and courses don't matter, it sounds like OP would be better off just not working for a couple years in a sort of "pre career sabbatical". If you're going to dedicate your time to exploring ideas without an income, you might as well not waste your time on useless classes and accrue unnecessary debt.
With the above context, I think we can agree the risks for this person is low. If things go badly there's a landing spot.
All the information is online these days. Universities are good at teaching things for two things: they guide you through the field in the right order and teach you what's important, and there's someone pushing you to do your work with deadlines and such. (Of course the value of universities is not just in the teaching/learning bit.) If you have the motivation for 2, and you have a good guide/job to do 1, then a unviersity might not offer you as much value.
The whole debate is only in issue in the US where it‘s always tied to debt. Come to Europe and enjoy university for free!
Finish school. Slow down. Think about what you want to do.
https://writeofpassage.school/#pricing
I'm not sure what to think about dropping out of college to spend $4-$7k on a course about writing? That is definitely getting up to the level, at least, of what some college courses would cost.
As far as dropping out just generally goes ... what's the rush? Especially if you're close to being done in any case? People shouldn't write off the utility of the credential itself, regardless of their own personal feelings on the subject.
The main benefits of the course that I see are:
- focus on writing online, they make you make a personal website, they give you advice for twitter, medium, etc
- community--people here are much cooler than average college students, they are successful, interesting, connected, and experienced in writing online and are more than willing to share their advice
- there are no grades, which allows me to optimize my time how I want
With respect to writing specifically, there is no magic bullet. Writing takes practice and learning some tricks to optimize your own workflow. You could, after all, practice that in your spare time and stay in school :) Don't quit a program just to do things you could have done while staying in.
"Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something."
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I have heard the TN visa for Canadians allows you to substitute something like 3 years of work experience for 1 year equivalency of a college education.
[1] https://www.mcgill.ca/es/admissions-profile
This person will get a rude awakening when they need to go the next step and realize "almost a degree" isn't really a degree.
I had to double check that this was no satire, as this is remarkably ignorant. Ironically it demonstrates that no, Simon does not "know", what a classical general education is and what it is supposed to provide, specifically when delivered in an environment that considers academic knowledge and research as valuable as ends, not means.
Dear Simon, a four year education at a credible institution is neither about resume-packing skills nor partying to build a network...
I can't decide if such misplaced self confidence is more demonstrative of generic individual hubris based on no actual world experience,
or an indictment of the conversion over the last decades of four-year college education into a de facto half-million-dollar glorified boot camp,
but either way, what a shame.
This still raises the question: is the education Simon is getting at McGill actually providing this? I strongly suspect the answer is "no", since almost no college now actually provides what a "classical general education" is supposed to provide. Particularly if one is getting a CS degree. That's a specific credential for a specific career path, and the education that comes with it is focused on that.
> an environment that considers academic knowledge and research as valuable as ends, not means.
This again raises the question: is any college now actually such an environment? Certainly the governments that pay for the research don't view it as an end, they view it as a means. After decades of that system, that attitude has percolated down to the professors and students.
I'm reminded of the recent post about the 22 year old who said they had failed: "Your mistake was thinking you could go into, say, a CS degree and have nothing to learn."[0]
Of course, dropping out and starting a career at FB (or similar) is hardly a bad move. Who can say if it's the right thing to do or not? It's hard to discern a positive motive, though, when 95% of the reasoning is why college isn't great, and the bit about Facebook or throwing startup ideas at the wall to see what sticks barely passes as a footnote. Generally the best decisions don't come from focussing on what you don't want to do.
[0]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28575317
If I were 21ish and had gotten this far, I absolutely would have made this choice, and it absolutely (for me) would have been the wrongest choice I could have made in that moment.
The credential matters, and is worth 10 fold the value of that checked box on interview applications. To the people whose opinion Simon likely cares about, it proves you can stick with something that's unpleasant long enough to see it through to completion. Completing college (or not, as it's something I haven't done) sticks with you in conversations, in social interactions, and in the minds of others.
If you ever want to do anything besides bootstrap your own startup all the way to product/market fit (not as easy as you possibly think right now), not finishing college will create a little nugget of, if not doubt, then "prove it now" mentality in the heads of the people whose opinions you care about (both professionally e.g. investors and personally e.g. friends).
If you're 20 or 21, your primary advantage is time. You do have the time to finish up college, and then do all of these things. You can do both, and pretending like you can't is just giving in to that underdeveloped prefrontal cortex.
Simon, I hope I'm wrong, but this is a mistake. You will regret this.
I was recently looking to switch jobs and actually removed the "education" section from my resume because it was taking too much space. Prospective employers care much more about work experience and other relevant projects than the college courses you took a decade ago.
For very early stage startups, or if you're a cofounder, that's different. The further into in a company's lifetime, the more required it is, in my experience. In other words, it's a barrier to some things.
Not to say that it's everyone's path, but I don't think everyone realizes that there is a ceiling, and it does not get easier to obtain an undergraduate degree than it is if you're 20 and have already completed three years worth of the program.
Companies aren't going to ask for college transcripts when offering you a promotion. What matters is your experience and performance, that's it.
I agree that what you say about experience and performance should be the only thing that matters, but it's naive to think that's simply "true", with no caveats, qualifications, or exceptions.
I don't think it's as common as you think as you progress in your career beyond an individual contributor, generally in the tech industry, and specifically at Microsoft I'm 75% sure what you're saying is not the case, with a very small handful of exceptions.
Ditching the degree will also make it harder to move abroad if you want to in the future, since most immigration formalities evaluate education level. This is definitely true when it comes to emigrating _into_ the US, for example.
Also, if you ever decide you need to go back to university (school) to learn about something in the future, I don't know about the US, but in Europe, a condition of entry to masters programmes is always holding a bachelors degree. So if you have to go back to school here, likely you'll be going back to bachelors level. I don't even know how valuable your existing credits would be - I can tell you that they tend to expire in the EU.
So, there are some consequences to this choice. I'm not judging, each to their own, but if it were me, I'd say life isn't a race and unless you are already sat on a potential unicorn and it 'has to be now' Bill-Gates-style, a couple more years while you finish your degree is nothing.
Maybe he does a series of startups and one hits. Maybe he's lucky, or brilliant, but the opportunity cost of 4 years in your early 20s is insignificant compared to the same time in your 30s and later. The feeling of this kid's parents isn't sadness or disappointment in foregone dreams, it's awe at how stupid he is being while still managing to dress and feed himself unassisted.
Dear Kid - you're making a staggeringly poor quality decision, go back to school.
Governments are some of the most picky about credentials.
Like I said in the essay, I have a full time offer from Facebook in Menlo Park, so I don't think your point about large companies holds.
In the case that I want to do a masters, I think I can reapply for admission to McGill and finish off my degree.
"awe at how stupid he is being while still managing to dress and feed himself unassisted" I'm stealing this insult lol
However, be suspicious of anyone who hires you. It's very difficult to tell if we are smart or just easily manipulated by people who tell us we are. (hint: if you aren't already rich, seriously evaluate the likelihood of the latter) The time it takes to go back and finish your degree after you are 30 can work out to a few hundred thousand dollars in deferred wages/opportunity cost, meaning you aren't going to do it because it's not worth it, and you're going to be under that ceiling for good unless you find a way to really build wealth.
There is zero cost to you spending another couple years in school right now, especially if you are FB level talent. It's all there waiting for you.
Drop out to run a profitable company, never drop out for just a job, especially a fancy one. Prestige is what they offer you when it's not worth it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
That said, I wonder if a university will confirm a partially completed degree. If not, it becomes something that rounds down to zero at anywhere that takes background checking seriously.
Don't drop out and work for FB though. I can tell you are fired up and excited to do things - but big corporations like FB will suck you dry and you will get nothing in return.
I hope Facebook can pay this kid in Dunning-Krugerrands.
What a lot of early dropouts don't seem to realize is that the normal university experience in is very tail-loaded towards the tough, interesting courses. You can blitz through a couple years of basics and fume about how slow stuff is, or that the Intro Programming is in the "Wrong Language (TM)", but most of what I remember being good were 300- and 400-level courses. As you specialize, you also pick up a lot of these courses, relatively speaking.
There's also a lot to be said for, I dunno, all the other courses that you could be doing at a university for intellectual breadth. It's not a vocational school.
Oh well, he has a starter job at a tech company, which will probably be for life. That's how that works, right?
Sorry if my comment on PHP was in poor taste, but it was more of an easy rag than the crux of my argument. I do standby that most CS courses that are supposed to be "practical" teach outdated material (at least at McGill), but of course there are exceptions (e.g. I used ZooKeeper in my distributed systems course).
I do think that I do a decent job in my essay explaining how I can fulfill the three reasons people go to college by myself, so I think that merits more of a response than a mocking quote (if I'm reading the tone right).
For the record, I took several 500 level courses (along with 300-400 level courses) and although I did learn a good amount, I still think that my time would have been better spent elsewhere.
Also for the record, I took several psychology and philosophy courses where I liked the content but felt the professors/TAs tried to shoehorn me into some method of thinking and take it out on my grades when they disagreed with my essays. I will gladly read the same content on my own time and discuss it with other interested people.
Follow your dreams, but after you get the degree. A degree now days primarily is a signifier of two things: you have the the patience and discipline to stick through it and do well, and you are able to conform. The biggest benefits conferred by a degree are the networking you will do while at a good college, and being able to pass hiring gatekeeper checklists. This is doubly so if you plan on doing any kind of research.
There are still places that will block you if you do not have a degree. The person that does it is an initial screener that is just looking at a checklist and nothing more. This probably (possibly?) does not apply if you have software engineer at a FAANG company on your resume.
Who am I to comment? I basically did this, but went the corporate route. I dropped out to work in the corporate world, rather than startups. For family reasons I am unable to move to SV or NYC. After a career spanning 25 years I am making roughly $180k salary, not counting benefits, in Maryland.
I have worked my rear off to get there, and I am in the process of going back to get my bachelors...because there are positions where the division head has to sign a waiver for me to be hired to the project in that position, because I do not have a degree.
There is a caveat..I am in a somewhat degree-obsessed are, defense consulting. Still, I urge the OP to reconsider.
Simon, I am a Canadian founder. I got my first job offer in the US (San Francisco) at 25 years old. I took it right away. It was not FAANG, though I was interviewed there many times: not once was I given an offer. My degree was in Biochemistry, not CS. I probably would have been over the moon to get an offer from FB. So I can understand how you feel.
However; I think you should consider finishing your degree. The job offer from Facebook will always be around -- or some equivalent. If you can get that at 20/21 you can get it at 21/22. The only time where I'd recommend somebody drop out is if they're committed to a project that is either clearly a business or has the potential to be one and they're pursuing entrepreneurship. I know a number of founders that have pursued this route and are quite successful. That said; college is really a once-in-a-lifetime experience. I wouldn't trade my time in college for anything, even though coming to Silicon Valley at 25 years old made me feel ancient. If you focus your last year on personal growth, hacking, friends, your network, building relationships - both at McGill and around Silicon Valley - you'll be even more set up to succeed post-graduation.
Re: the FB offer. The ugly truth you're glossing over is that working at FAANG can -- for many -- ultimately be just as boring as coursework in college. If you want to get into startups and like the energy surrounding them, my recommendation is use your last year of college to (1) kick college's ass and get that degree so immigration is easier and (2) start a badass side project.
That's my $0.02 but YMMV. Shoot me a DM on Twitter if you feel like chatting.
In many cases I learned helpful things and gained an appreciation for subjects and people outside of my bubble.
Go back to college when you're older and then study something you'll appreciate learning. Hungry kids like this who want to start making stuff in the real world should do just that.
The argument here is primarily that college is a unique experience that you don't really get to go back to and, in this specific case, the investment remaining is minimal. I can wax poetic about socialization and being young and a whole load of other things, but college is really just what you make of it. It is entirely within somebody's power to make their last remaining year of college enjoyable in the same way they have the capacity to make their first year in the workforce enjoyable.
Simon can do whatever he likes. The wonderful thing about his situation is that there are no bad options. That's when decisions are truly difficult, when you're maximizing EV between things that have unpredictable upside. I'd say -- from a pure EV perspective -- the downside of not having a degree (likely permanent) exceeds the upside of starting in the work force 8mo early (job offer effectively fungible, just have to wait 8mo). The scenario in which this would flip would be if the upside was an order of magnitude or more larger; like double-digit early equity in a promising company with traction that's starting YC.
Basically lining himself up to be a slave to the system.... He will make a good cog in the machine.