I am always getting very excited when I see a new "OS" announcement. But disappointment sets in when I
then learn that it is either a Linux kernel with a new
package manager or a (slightly) patched Linux kernel.
It would be nice to distinguish in the title between such efforts and true new OSes like Haiku, Serenity.
The first question that immediately comes up is: has this project received any independent third-party security audits? Has it been otherwise peer reviewed by the security community?
I'm pretty new to using Linux. Anyone know how I can get a firewall like the one being used by SubgraphOS? Meaning a GUI way to give each app permission to connect to the internet, even a one-time permission?
Big fan of Subgraph. Haven't seen any activity in the last few years, aligning with grsecurity going private after 4.4. Would love to know what happened?
9 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 31.0 ms ] threadIt would be nice to distinguish in the title between such efforts and true new OSes like Haiku, Serenity.
I would say that something like seL4 muslc and Gnu/BSD/Toybox user-land would make a good base for security to start with...bit like Genode
Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'd love to know.
"Downloads disabled as we are still developing Citadel and the new Subgraph OS. Check back soon for a new release."