A coherent new theory of physics and cosmology

Hello everybody!

I'm new to HN as a registered user so sorry if I do something that breaks the site's etiquette; it's not on purpose.

I tried to post a link to my textual presentation about my ideas about cosmology and physics, but the problem must have been that the YT video had maybe some copyrighted music in the background or maybe also the simple fact that it was a YouTube video caused it to be stealth banned. I'm very eager to discuss these ideas with people who have more background in the natural sciences than I do so I'll just post the textual content of that YT video here simply as a list of theses that I think together form a very coherent and plausible model of these things, and see what happens.

1) First there was a primordial state of now unknown and nonexistent finegrained matter which we can call for example Hyle for the lack of a better term.

2) From Hyle emerged the Hydrogen atoms (as in the process of emergence where the whole is nonreducible to it's parts like H2 & O != H2O).

3) The star generations produced most of the other elements of the periodic table, etc, as is generally known.

4) Atom has the attributes of mass and gravity. Photon has the attribute of mass but not the attribute of gravity. Now the birth of the black hole is explained: mass is lost by the emanation of subatomic particles while the gravity field of the star stays the same. It's all about the mass - gravity balance of the object. It could theoretically be reversed once we know this.

5) Photon can be affected by gravity and yet have no gravity influence in itself. Therefore it can for example be trapped in a black hole.

6) Gravity is faster than light. No curving gravitational geometry outside the realm of physics ad hoc hypothesis is now needed to get the GPS calculations right.

7) Neutron might be the graviton. If it is this is huge and might be the key to anti - gravity technology. Arguments (which might be little weak as solid proving goes I know) for it: a) neutron stars have very big gravitational influence b) neutron is part of the atom so it might be the thing the photon lacks.

8) What does the red shift prove other than that the light coming from far away seems to be more red? What other proofs there are for the Big Bang? Dark energy is an ad hoc argument to explain the propulsion from the initial gravitation field. My guess: it is as nonexistent as is the gravitational geometry outside of the realm of physics (Einstein's own words!), just a gimmick to save the holy cow of "Big Bang happened" like the other holy cow named "Speed of light is cap".

9) Eventually (if not interfered with...) there will be the Big Crunch. But now if my system holds this will eventually mean that the mass - gravity ratio of the universe will balance itself and therefore the Hole will cease to exist, releasing uniformly something called Hyle.

10) Repeat 1) - 9).