12 comments

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 44.5 ms ] thread
Of course. Its cognitive bias at work. People are always discontent with their government. Failing to properly understand economics and politics, people exaggerate things to find reasons to accuse the government.
If you exclude services, then 35% of consumer spending is on imports. I think that number matches up more closely with peoples expectations. That said, oil really distorts that number.
75% of motor vehicle purchases were "Made in America"? That is astonishing. Unbelievable, even.
I don't think that's what it means. I might be wrong, but I got the impression it meant that 75% of the total money spent on motor vehicles ultimately stays in the US in some fashion. Either because it was assembled here or because of dealer commissions or because it costs money to hire US companies to move the cars from the port to the lot, etc.
The biggest sellers from foreign carmakers often end up manufactured in their USA-based plants, which then makes them "Made in America". Add that to the American carmakers and it seems reasonable to reach 75%.
The only plausible explanation would be that a large portion of foreign car purchases are from the foreign factories in the US. BMW, Mercedes, and practially all of the Japanese manufacturers make some of their cars here.
Why aren't consumer electronics products in there? It seems to me they are only picking those with a high chance of being made in America.

Also, does this "made in America" refer to the whole product or just the packaging/assembly, while the components are still made in China?

In regards to your second question, check out figure 2 way at the bottom of the article where they have a breakdown of made in us with us parts vs. made in us without us parts, etc.
It isn't labeled in the chart, but the text of the article notes that electronics fall into the durable goods category along with cars, furniture, etc... So they are including all imports, not cherry picking.
Consumerism != Capitalism
http://www.evolvingexcellence.com/blog/2011/08/the-fed-disho...

These guys call BS on the Fed's numbers, and then ask why the Fed deliberately made this complex calculation in a way to deceive what is really happening

Well I'm not sure who to believe, but leading off their rebuttal with, "I am not going to begin to decipher their convoluted logic" does not inspire confidence.