Ask HN: Best way to organize 100-200 emails/day in Outlook?

67 points by cwwc ↗ HN
Will be starting as an M&A lawyer and especially now the volume of emails is massive. How is the best way you all have found to organize in outlook? As reference: usually there will be ~ 10 matters (deals) going on at the same time. Previous jobs have been mostly blue collar/physical labor so I don’t have much context on how to proceed.

60 comments

[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 127 ms ] thread
1. Get rid of all the crap as fast as possible: delete spam, unsubscribe from mailing lists that you don't need. 2. Setup folders and filter rules to have mails sorted automatically. For example, you could have one folder per project or one folder per client. How you structure your folders depends on your work process. 3. Use the Eisenhower Method when going through new mail. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_management#The_Eisenhower...)
Seconding this, I used to receive 200+ emails a day (not including spam) in a previous job and the only way I managed it was a combination of filters and folders and the ability to rapidly delegate messages to coworkers.
Some additional comments:

- get a sense of the ebb and flow before doing anything that radically restructures your inbox. Also find out about your firm's document retention policies and practices.

- pick an organizing philosophy and stick with it for a month before revising (refactoring) it or ditching it.

- I organized my filters around a modified 7 habits of highly effective people approach: mail from above was urgent, mail from colleagues was important, mail from outside that set was not important unless I'd participated in the chain, and everything else was not urgent & not important and frequently ignored entirely.

+1 for filters and folders.

Then either Do, Defer or Delegate.

  Mark as spam
I am cheekily serious. Your problem does not generalize. The people to ask our your coworkers. Probably starting with your direct supervisor.

Because the organization of email works best if it correlates with the way you have to use them to do your job. That determines what is a courtesy copy and what is critical to your attention and what can be completely ignored.

It determines whether the high bit is client or date or buyer or seller or something else.

ONE EMAIL RULE

Email in your inbox is only for email where you are on the TO: line.

All other emails (BCC'ed or CC'ed) should go into a folder called "Inbox - CC."

That's it.

https://www.hanselman.com/blog/one-email-rule-have-a-separat...

Been following this for years - my email volume is enormous. Having all DL mails go to another folder was not sufficient. Making cc emails go to another folder clearly identifies anything that “might” need my attention vs. FYI emails.
That’s a good idea. I love it.

However, if you are client facing it probably isn’t viable because external clients don’t follow the sort of internal logic that Hanselman can assume as an employee of Microsoft.

M&A clients will use email without regard to the internal hierarchy of the law firm. They will send it to the partner and copy a bunch of other people who are the ones who must act.

And the law partner and the clients won’t take “I wasn’t on the TO line” as an excuse more than once and maybe not at all.

I think it can still work and be helpful. It lets you triage the most important emails first and the. Go through the cc folder after. The only issue is your iPhone, as you might only see main inbox come in there and you could not notice something g timely.

  Re: project 
Is a common subject line from clients. Heuristics that work internally, those that allow emails to be ignored, fall by the wayside when big money detail oriented customer service is the job.

What matters is how the client used email. If it is confusing and more work than it should be, so what? Sucking it up is what legal professionals are paid to do. When a deal crashes, there’s no debug and recompile cycle.

  Re: kickoff
The "rule" also depends on what happens if you don't act. If you're in a large organization and CC'd by default and nothing bad really happens if you don't read your emails because your action is rarely needed, then sure.

If you're CC'd but the work won't be done if you don't read the email, because you are the one who will do the work, then it's not viable to skip CC's.

I didn't know about that, thanks for sharing it.
There's a cute feature of Outlook these days, where if you get @named in the body of the email, you are added to the To: field, if you are already on the CC: field you get moved to the To: field. You also get an @ icon in your inbox next to the email showing that you've been directly referenced.

Once people know about this feature it works quite well pulling you into a conversation that you may be ignoring as you were only CC'd up to that point.

Someone at my client's site used @all in the middle of a sentence to address everyone already in the email chain. Outlook added the alias for "everyone in the company". A bit embarrassing.
Junior lawyers are often CC’d on things they are primarily responsible for due to opaque team structures. You cannot assume CC emails are lower priority in that job.
I did that at my first job out of college and it ended up being a bad idea. There were many emails that I did need to take action on which ended up in there. Optimally that wouldn't be the case, but I can't control how others address their emails.
So this volume is an email every 3-5 minutes, for 9 straight hours. Presumably this type of job is not an 8-5 deal so you'll be answering emails early in the morning and late at night, but let's assume there are at least some periods during the work day where it will approach that volume. Let's also assume you've already removed all the newsletters, spam, etc. and these are 100-200 emails you have to at least look at every day, and that you can't just ignore or delete a chunk of them.

The hardest part will be filtering the (as @sumthinprofound put it) the "do" from the "defer." If you're starting out you probably can't delegate much beyond the admin stuff. Utilize tagging and importance levels. If something is sent only to you, it's probably more important than something sent to 15 people. You can't jump every time an email comes in or you won't be able to do more than a few minutes of real work at a time. So, try to get away with only actively checking email every 30-60 minutes and taking a dedicated block of time to reply to everything that you can. Your particular org structure and culture will determine how exactly this plays out, but when I was running a brick & mortar business I would spend about 30-45 minutes on emails twice a day, at 8am and 7pm (give or take). I was only looking at 50-60 real emails a day though and that time usually included whatever work I needed to do to "complete" that email.

You'll want to get to the point where you can be alerted to truly critical emails, but the other stuff just sort of sits there until you can get to it. It will take some time to figure that out, and only you know what the reaction at your work will be if you miss a critical email for half an hour, to know how strict you can be with your filtering (stricter is better obviously but you will end up with false negatives and stuff sitting in your inbox for an hour that really should have been addressed within five or ten minutes).

I highly recommend Getting Things Done. It's a whole system, but there are lots of small rules you can extract and use to great effect.

For instance:

- If an email takes 2 min to answer, do it.

- If it requires an action from you, but at another time. Move it to a "next action" folder (that you'll work through when you have the time).

- Also "archive" and "references" folders are useful, possibly organized by project.

- "Inbox zero" to reduce stress and keep yourself sane.

When you receive very large volumes of email "inbox zero" can become very stressful! It's a good technique but I think you have to accept falling behind sometimes.
Inbox zero is a way of managing it, not a strict target at all times. I keep it on zero even when I am in vacation, it is less stress for me when I return to the office.
Absolutely. The inbox shouldn't be zero at all times, so you shouldn't hurry to clear an email the instant it arrives. But it's a state to strive towards.

Another GTD tip is to have recurring reviews where the goal is to clear your inboxes. They recommend weekly reviews, but you can have them more often or less often if you like.

I find this helps a lot as a tool to return to a good, organized, state whenever chaos strikes. (And it works just as well even if I've missed a couple of reviews.)

The easiest change is to route cc’d emails to another folder that you don’t check regularly.

I handle 2x your volume and this was the best change I ever made.

Use mail rules to sort email into folders automatically. Try to keep email you don't need to read immediately out of your inbox. Use mail rules to highlight messages sent only to you, or where you are in the to: section so that they stand out. Set up mailing lists for each project to make sorting simpler. Use auto archive to keep the size of your inbox in check. Make sure you have a search index set up so you can quickly find emails buried away in archives. Make use of the "tasks" feature to flag emails you need to respond to later.
I use a method along the same lines. I have two 'triage' folders, one for internal emails and one for external. Everything else gets a folder and a matching rule once I get more than a few emails from the sender or it is evident that I want the emails to be identified and sorted. I use nested folders to group people and topics then a rule that pops a notice if an email is sent to me directly. It varies per org and per role but I end up with a structure that is excellent at me seeing and responding to my emails in a timely way. I make sure to have conversation view on and that provides cross visibility in the folders. I agree with you on the tasks and archive recommendations as there is even more integration with To Do and Planner in the MS ecosystem. It is important to try out different methods and figure out what works best for you. Personally, I like making the computer do the work and that's been effective even in the upper thousands of emails.
I've been using the following system for a few years now and I am able to handle a high volume of emails with it.

1. Create categories: .Urgent, .When Possible, PJ Your Project, PJ ...

2. Create two folders: .Action [Set "View" to "Date (Conversations)], .Archive [Set "View" to "Categories"]

3. Create Quick Steps: "Action - Urgent" (Actions: Clear Categories, Move to .Action, Categorize message: .Urgent, Mark as Read, Shortcut: CTRL+Shift+1), "Action - When possible" (Actions: Clear Categories, Move to .Action, Categorize message: .When possible, Mark as Read, Shortcut: CTRL+Shift+2), "Archive" (Actions: Move to .Archive, Categorize message [Leave the category empty to be prompted for the category], Mark as Read, Shortcut: CTRL+Shift+3)

4. Schedule email sessions in your calendar (max. 2 times/day for a fixed time period): For each email: Delete or use the shortcuts to assign them as "Urgent", "When possible" or "Archive" them. Inbox should be empty afterwards. Do not take a look into the inbox outside of scheduled inbox sessions.

5. Work on the emails: Work on the emails in the ".Urgent" folder first. If you got time, work on the emails in the ".Action" folder next.

Use filters. I've had jobs that receive 3000+ emails a day which aren't a problem because of filters
I generally subscribe to the GTD/inbox zero approach mentioned in one of the other comments. In this system, after reading an email it should be processed into your task management system, unread emails are waiting to be processed and read emails have already been processed, so no need to worry in either case.

To process an email means to read it and determine what action is necessary and, if relevant, file in the task system. The possible outcomes from reading an email are: Do, Defer, Delegate, or Archive.

You should Do something immediately if it’s very urgent or quick to do. Otherwise Defer the action for later by saving a task in your management system (not in you inbox). Delegate and Archive are pretty straightforward. Read up on GTD method for more details.

Remember: E-mail is a todo list created by other people. Obviously do the most pertinent stuff first, but be cautious of 'cruft' email that slows you down.
I really like Opera mail, but it's no longer under development, not even sure if you can download it any longer. You could train the mail client to auto sort e-mails using bayesian filters- think of it like having 10 different "spam" folders, but one of the folder is messages about domains, another is weekly server logs, another is personal e-mails, and every client or project has it's own folder, and the email clients sorts the mail for you! You could also tag e-mails so you could have a list of e-mails with the tag "important note", or "receipt". It also "auto"-sorted the mail by date, so you could group by month or week.

Unless someone does it first, I will probably make my own mail client with these old Opera mail features.

100-200 is pretty low for a busy attorney. Your firm will have a DMS of some kind (likely iManage or NetDocuments—hopefully not Worldox or something similarly outdated). Most people let the emails accumulate through the day and file them first thing in the morning, at the end of the day, or while on conference calls.

My tips are to enable the CC-yourself option in Outlook to make sure you catch all of your sent emails, and to otherwise keep your sent emails in your sent mailbox until you record your time.

A lot of attorneys hold off on filing emails entirely until they put their time in (i.e. record down their hours for billing purposes). But typically all you really need is what is in your sent email box, which can then be deleted. And keeping up on filing your other emails helps other attorneys and makes you look good.

Based on the experience of ~500 email/day: I check emails every 1-2 hours and act on it in 5 minutes.

- stuff I can immediately delete

- stuff I can respond with one liner on the spot

- stuff I need to do some work on, I leave it separate for later that day or I forward it to myself for later

This is based on urgency and importance, that is easy to assess. Reading an email takes from a few seconds to a minute, 200 emails should not take more than 30 minutes to check. If you leave it to pile up, it is harder to manage (at least for me).

One more thing I do is I ask my team no avoid sending me emails I don't need to act on and I don't need to be informed about. I also tell them to put me in CC if I don't need to act. It reduces the number of emails I receive and it makes it easier to evaluate. On average I have less than 50 emails per day that I really need to read and less than 25 are important.

Depending if your mail is internal or not, route all external messages or messages not from certain domains to an external filter. Check that less often.

When you meet with people who email you a lot, sort your inbox by person, and with the list in front of you take a moment to ask them “is there anything you’ve sent me that we need to talk about?”

Set up alerts /notifications for VIPs.

Are you at a firm? I’d encourage you to ask the people on your team. It wouldn’t be a weird question to ask a fellow associate (or if you are comfortable, the partner).

You also want to make sure you understand your firm’s email archiving and retention policy. Some firms have specific controls in place (systems that delete uncategorized emails from your inbox after a certain amount of time).

I worked on M&A deals, but doing the IP/Privacy support and not running the whole deal. My structure while working at a bigger firm, which wasn’t perfect, but worked, was to have a folder for each client and a folder for each big client project/deal. Then just keep moving emails to each project folder as they came in. I didn’t really trust rules to do it for me automatically, but that’s just me.

I also set up Outlook to file reply messages in the folder where the original email was. Then I would generally respond only after I’d move the email.

I feel like I’m rambling now, but in case this is remotely helpful, here are a few other thoughts/pain points: 1. I kept my tasks list separate from my inbox. 2. Hot keys are great, especially for moving to folders and finding emails in a thread. There’s not much you need a mouse for after a while. 3. Moving emails to folders is slow if outlook has to populate the huge list of potential folders each time. If you have lots of clients, it may make sense to split things up alphabetically first (Clients A-G in one folder, etc.). 4. This system was also helpful for syncing emails to the correct folder in the firm document management system, which is a whole separate conversation.

Feel free to disregard, but I figured I’d pass along my system, as it seems to be pretty different from what I’m reading here. Firms are interesting animals, especially where record keeping is involved.

I’m an attorney at a major firm and receive a couple to a few hundred emails daily. In general, auto-filtering emails away from the inbox is not possible, because you really may need to look at every email for possible relevance to a matter.

My system is simple: a general archive folder, matter-specific folders, and then a to-do list for longer-running things. I aim for inbox zero: every message in the inbox is either one I haven’t reviewed yet or one that I can act on quickly. Every email gets read, acted on or added to the to-do list if necessary, and then filed.

Outlook’s search feature works tolerably well. I search for emails from senders, to recipients, or within certain folders many times a day.

I’m not a lawyer, but I get a metric ton (yep, I weighed it) of email every day in my job. Others have mentioned GTD, and that’s the general process I use to manage everything. But something I haven’t heard mentioned yet: only touch an email once. Triage it as it comes in.

Does it need a reply? Can you reply right now? Reply to it and move it out of your inbox.

Is it something you need to act on later? Make an action in your to-do system. That can be as simple as (in my case) dragging it to Apple Reminders to create a new action with a handy clickable link back to the original email, and setting a meaningful, actionable title like “Review Joe’s proposal”. Now it’s in my actual to-do system, and not a ghost of a vaguely formed request sitting in my inbox and taunting me.

If it’s useful information, archive it, either in the appropriate mail folder or your / your company’s DMS. For my personal use, I adore DEVONthink.

If it’s not something you need to reply to, or act on later, or store for future reference, delete it. I get literally dozens of requests for my time every day, from spammers or trade groups or people who want to sell my company something. I don’t owe those emails my attention.

An email inbox is a terrible task manager. Don’t let it become that for you. When an email comes in, process it one time and then get it out of your sight.

(comment deleted)
quite a bit off topic, but starting a busy time like an M&A lawyer, how do you keep up with and integrate tech in the day-to-day job?
my system:

1. make sure you don't check all the time, set specific hours.

2. Skim, respond right away if possible.

3. If I didn't have time to respond or it was low priority i'd mark as unread.

4. If it was high priority and I didn't have time to respond right then I would carve out time in my calendar to respond.

5. Review your queue of unread regularly but not as often as recent emails.

Generally I could tell how behind I was when traveling by the unread mail counter in outlook. If I prioritized well this seemed to work for me. Folders and filters never seemed to be able to ensure I wasn't missing things.

One technique I used in Outlook back when I was customer-facing was to have color rules, so an email with only me in the To: line would be green, me in the CC/BCC red. So you can glance at your unread/read inbox and get a signal as to what you might need to read first.

I’m sure you could do this with folders or tags in gmail, I found it useful to be able to see everything unread at a glance.

Never got to inbox zero consistently but archiving the “done” emails to stay as close as possible helps.

More important I think is having some system for managing your todos, which you need to be able to create in one click from an email. I ended up with an outlook task list, I think it’s useful to be able to trigger an email to be “due in 2 days” if you need to say check in on a thread.

For organizing a large collection of items, searching is preferred to sorting.

With sorting, you must assume how you will want to access the information in the future and put the item in a bucket. That assumption can be wrong, or you can know that something fits in multiple buckets. A particular medical bill could go in buckets "Bills to Pay", "Provider X", or "Tax-related Bills".

Tagging (multi-attribute) is superior to sorting (single attribute, equivalent to a single folder/bucket). You could assign all the above tags to the example medical bill. Tagging really helps when the search engine cannot extract enough information to query on. Especially for short texts or non-textual items, adding contextual tags may be necessary for searchability.

There was a good book [0]. If you’re just starting out, try your best for inbox zero.

I used to have 4 categories in outlook called SNA meeting, SNA Errand, SNA waiting.. SNA means strategic next action. It was great because you didn’t have to think about what you’re waiting to do on something.

[0]Take Back Your Life!: Using Microsoft® Outlook® to Get Organized and Stay Organized

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0735620407/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_...

Whenever I'd try this, once it would leave my inbox it would be out of mind and the rest of the day would inevitably find a way to get in my way. So I'd have a clean inbox, and then several growing folders that wouldn't get addressed.

For now I've settled on the approach of trying to keep it organized and file once I'm done with something. If someone needs something badly enough, they can bug me again or via another channel. There's simply too much volume to actively stay on top of.

(comment deleted)
I’m going to offer different advice than most of the advice you see here. I’m a litigator, but also spent some time as an M&A associate as a junior.

I don’t try for inbox zero and I don’t sort things into matter folders. I tried that when I first started out, but things were either out of sight, out of mind or I’d get behind and eventually lose emails to the firm retention policy.

Here’s my system now. Junk/newsletters get deleted ASAP. Things on my to do list get marked as Unread. Emails I don’t need to reference again are marked Read. Everything stays in my inbox until the end of the month. In my inbox folder, I have subfolders for each year and sub-subfolders for each month. At the end of the month, everything I received or sent gets dropped into the folder for that month. Then I make liberal use of the search and sort functions if I need to find things again. This works for me because I’m more likely to remember WHEN I worked on a particular matter than anything else.

If you do want to use matter/deal folders, I recommend you set up your rules to send copies to the folder, not clear your inbox entirely. I have a junior associate right now who regularly misses important emails because she has everything sorted into matter folders and forgets to check them. Or she forgets that she has to manually refresh her folders when checking email on her phone.

Also, as an associate, you usually can’t do the whole “only look at an email once” thing. You’ll often need to do some research or complete some work before you can reply. But! If you’ve been asked to handle something by email, I beg of you, please reply “will do” when you see the email (even if you’re not going to “do” right away) and then immediately put that item on your to do list so you don’t forget. I keep trying to pound this into my junior’s heads. Your senior associates/partners need to know that you’ve seen the email, even if you can’t give a substantive response right away. You’re a star associate if your response is “Will do. Can I get this to you by [time]?”

Similarly, you may be CC/BCC on an email that actually has tasks for you or is something you need to keep track of. For example, you may be the person collecting final signature pages for the team but only be CC on the emails circulating them. Or a partner may reply to an email you were CC on, leave you in CC, but ask you specifically to handle something. Do not assume an email not directed TO you has nothing important for you.

Also, the volume of emails during a deal is insane. During a closing once, I got 600 emails in an 8-hour period. If you’re not careful, you’ll spend your whole day checking email and not actually get any work done. Deals have more urgency than most litigation, so you probably can’t do what I do: turn off all your email notifications and only look at your inbox every couple of hours. Find a system that keeps you in the loop but doesn’t prevent you from working.

One clarification: I’m not suggesting someone “only look at an email once”, but that they only examine it to decide what to do next one time. For instance, if you email me “hey, I need X for the Smith project”, and that’s something that’s going to take me a little while to put together, I’ll:

- Create a to-do in my task manager like “Get IAAL X for the Smith project”, with a link to your original email so that I can find it again quickly when I’m ready to reply to it. - Archive your email so that it’s not staring at me.

Sure, I’ll have to see it again when I respond later. In the mean time, it’s not one of 500 messages fighting for my attention when I’m trying to decide what to work on next. By taking a moment to summarize the action as “get the X stuff for you”, I don’t have to re-analyze it again and again and again.