I think there's a very, very large reason that's only brushed on in point 2-- much like how "doing your job" and "interviewing for your job" require two very different skillsets, "doing your job" and "leading other people in doing what used to be your job" are nowhere near as related as they seem to be on first blush.
Point two seems to be talking more about micromanagement specifically, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's more the issue that people who like doing don't necessarily like leading.
I agree that teaching others what you know is a key ingredient for leaders. The aim should be to have your followers surpass you eventually. A second class leader will try to prevent that, that's a lose-lose for everyone.
Another reason that I think is missing here is when a person that should be a leader has a very liberal mindset that comes with a reluctance to tell other people what to do, regardless of ability (skill + confidence).
6 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 24.1 ms ] threadPoint two seems to be talking more about micromanagement specifically, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's more the issue that people who like doing don't necessarily like leading.
He said that?
Also please stop with the obnoxious appending on text copied.
Another reason that I think is missing here is when a person that should be a leader has a very liberal mindset that comes with a reluctance to tell other people what to do, regardless of ability (skill + confidence).