Title contains spoliers? :( Can it please be adjusted?
Not everyone has seen this movie because of covid restrictions (and I have been actively trying to avoid spoliers on the net).
I wouldn't worry, watching Bond isn't about really about the plot, it's about the action. If you want a good spy plot then Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy would be a better bet.
> We uncovered above-average sexual activity, often without sufficient time for an exchange of sexual history, with a remarkably high mortality among Bond's sexual partners (27.1; 95% confidence interval 16.4–40.3).
"You clean? - Yeah. You? - Yeah" has always worked for me. Knock on my wood.
18 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 55.2 ms ] thread"We're thinking this is a lab error because these three are found only in sharks"
"Bond #4 has eaten through its beaker"
From the article, "We found evidence for a total of 59 liaisons (mean of 2.4 per film)."
No it doesn’t
Source: seen the movie
No it doesn’t.
Source: saw the movie
Original poster was complaining about the title. Not the article contents.
Well played.
"You clean? - Yeah. You? - Yeah" has always worked for me. Knock on my wood.
Made me chuckle.