Whistleblower Absurdly Attacks Facebook's Privacy-Protecting Encryption Efforts (reason.com)

But how can governments keep people from circulating misinformation in their private messages if they can't inspect them?

When you ride with privacy, you ride with Putin.

The fundamental logic of safetyism practically demands opposition to encryption and totalitarian measures generally. If you believe the proper role of the state is not to protect rights, but to prevent "harm", then how can you be in favor of anything that impairs the ability of the state to destroy danger?