12 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 44.8 ms ] thread
Perhaps this is an American thing. I've never had someone look at or care about my (inactive) github account. It's not even on my resume, though if it was active I might put it on there.

Or, maybe I'm just doing it wrong.

I'm an american, and have never shared mine either. I only know a handful of other devs that share theirs, but for the most part I like to work for employers that don't care what I do in my free time as long as I deliver good code.
Nobody cares about your github for job interviews.
(comment deleted)
How true is this one? I'm quite curious about the other employers that look at your resume.
The only people I've even heard of looking at GitHub for job interviews was to judge new graduates. And that was only because it would have the only non-course work they could judge.
I don't ask for it or go looking for it, but if you found it important enough to put it on your resume, I'll look at it. If you link your GitHub, I'll poke around your repos. If you link your blog, I'll read a few posts.
Github is the most useless metric to get interviews. Would rather just reach out for referrals. I don't think Github would apply for experienced professionals unless they contributed something significant to open source.
It certainly is not a main criteria when hiring people but I always check the GitHub / Gitlab / etc. profile if applicants include it in their resume. Usually it gives a good indication about how the person is organized and how they communicate problems, especially if there are some recent projects.
Yes. People like you are very rare. I wish more people cared HOW and WHY an applicant did things rather than WHAT he/she did.
My GitHub was full of activity when I worked at a place where we used GitHub. Since then it's been pretty dead, and that's okay because noone gives a shit.
Don't give one, won't be an issue (for places where you likely want to work)

Easy optimization! :p

More on point, some of the tips sound good - eg: pin the things you're proud of.

Less good: activity squares.

If an applicant gives me a github thinking these squares (alone) will save them -- they won't.

A bunch of trash one-line delete/add commits give up the game. I want to see proper drafts, notes, and meaningful change.

One big meaningful change that takes six months to achieve is a better demonstration than idle busywork every day over the same span.