Right, so if an ISP doesn't have the capability to do that kind of blocking then the only way to comply with the court order is to null route blogspot.com
Or, more accurately, the IP address it resolves to. The ISP is primarily in the business of moving IP packets; domain names do not appear at the IP layer.
(they also provide DNS services; they could disable resolution of blogspot.com, is that what you meant?)
Isn't this about cost? It's cheaper to have a router filter out an IP address than it is to have the router inspect the traffic and filter it based on URL.
There is another tragicomic story about McDonald's Argentina removing the Big Mac (from the list) because the Government wants to hide the inflation index that will be revealed comparing to the Big Mac Index.
12 comments
[ 5.9 ms ] story [ 45.8 ms ] threadIn fact maybe someone with bandwidth could do that for Argentina to help them out ;)
(they also provide DNS services; they could disable resolution of blogspot.com, is that what you meant?)
(Also, the site in question seems pretty interesting. A wikileaks-alike?)
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?sclient=psy&...
See:
- The Big Mac Index: Case of the Mysterious Disappearing Big Mac in Buenos Aires http://localbuenosaires.wordpress.com/2011/05/13/the-big-mac... (read the comments)
- http://www.economist.com/node/18587317