Thanks for the comment, appreciated. That's definitely not the intention. It started as a collection of resources I used for my own understanding, which I then decided to share more widely, as many friends started to want to learn about the space too.
What do you think would make it better if included?
The problem is the premise. I don't think any of this is/will be "web 3.0" presenting it as such feels more like trying to establish the narrative that these technologies somehow represent the future to further the ponzi schemes build on them.
I am not sure I agree with that characterisation. If you look at the website, you will see that it covers a breadth of topics and areas, including the risks associated with many of these technologies.
4 comments
[ 0.20 ms ] story [ 23.4 ms ] threadWhat do you think would make it better if included?