4 comments

[ 9.5 ms ] story [ 24.4 ms ] thread
I read this as "Lush was in trouble due to a whistleblower" and not "Facebook sucks, so Lush quit". Even the article was unclear. I don't consume media often so this initially scared me that Lush was including toxic products until I concluded it was a Facebook whistleblower, not a Lush one.

To clarify: "Lush quits social media due to Facebook's bad impact on society"

Well done them. Bad headline.

Disclosure - I have a Lush product on my body.