"We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination."
apparently this isn't even a research institute but a cardio clinic run by a guy who is the sole author on the paper and one of the first google reviews calls him a "scammer who sells supplements" and whose wikipedia page mentions that he's made misleading claims about inflammation in the past.
2) It's a single author. That's weird, and rare, considering a single person certainly didn't do all the work this abstract describes themselves
3) The single author is Steven Gundry, a "functional" medicine quack renowned for promoting lectin-avoidance diets as cure-alls.
4) It's absolutely impossible to ascertain the methods here.
Because the abstract is terribly written, it's almost impossible to work out what they're actually trying to report
I'm not a cardiologist, but from what I can tell and my general impression the PULS test is not a validated biomarker. The website gives no publications. The papers referenced in the FAQ are small and terribly cited. The test is marketed by numerous natural health websites. "
7 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 14.4 ms ] thread"We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination."
Archived here:
https://archive.md/xwMUe
I did:
The International Heart and Lung Institute, Palm Springs, CA
LOL, Palm Springs. I am extremely skeptical.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Gundry
"1) It's a non-peer-reviewed conference abstract.
2) It's a single author. That's weird, and rare, considering a single person certainly didn't do all the work this abstract describes themselves
3) The single author is Steven Gundry, a "functional" medicine quack renowned for promoting lectin-avoidance diets as cure-alls.
4) It's absolutely impossible to ascertain the methods here.
Because the abstract is terribly written, it's almost impossible to work out what they're actually trying to report
I'm not a cardiologist, but from what I can tell and my general impression the PULS test is not a validated biomarker. The website gives no publications. The papers referenced in the FAQ are small and terribly cited. The test is marketed by numerous natural health websites. "