[–] visarga 4y ago ↗ Nice read, but doesn't say anything about business jargon. [–] spadros 4y ago ↗ Came here to say this. Was greatly disappointed by the lack of jargon and etymology. [–] maroonblazer 4y ago ↗ Yeah, I was looking forward to 1500-ish versions of "circle back" "reach out" "leverage" "long pole in tent", etc...
[–] spadros 4y ago ↗ Came here to say this. Was greatly disappointed by the lack of jargon and etymology. [–] maroonblazer 4y ago ↗ Yeah, I was looking forward to 1500-ish versions of "circle back" "reach out" "leverage" "long pole in tent", etc...
[–] maroonblazer 4y ago ↗ Yeah, I was looking forward to 1500-ish versions of "circle back" "reach out" "leverage" "long pole in tent", etc...
[–] thedailymail 4y ago ↗ Given the focus on the East India Company (chartered by Queen Elizabeth I on December 31, 1600), shouldn't this be "seventeenth-century"?
4 comments
[ 4.9 ms ] story [ 23.6 ms ] thread