Finally finished watching this. There was also discussion on what an ethical implementation would look like, discussing exemptions etc. The pro-mandate ethicist said she believes offering religious exemptions is just asking people to lie and would not offer them in the same form. Largely her idea is to make it so onerous for a person to prove their true conviction that it will naturally ferret out the non-believers. Seems we've already been through that mechanism for those who still refuse, given the 4-month propaganda campaign organized by the Federal Government. I personally am unwilling to sit an interrogation as Dorit suggests.
1 comment
[ 1.5 ms ] story [ 16.1 ms ] thread