As an Indian driver, I'm worried about bumpers and mirrors getting cameras and other electronics which makes scrapes much more expensive. My car has electronic mirrors which fold forward if something overtaking from behind gets too close. Ill be scared of driving a car with cameras on the mirrors.
Take a look at the Honda E mirrors. Hopefully we get something like that since they stick out less than normal mirrors. Don't know what a replacement costs though. I'm honestly much more worried about the price of headlights nowadays.
My model vehicle with cameras and heaters in the mirror and your regular HID headlights cost nearly the same $600-$700 depending on the oem retailer website (not dealer).
If this was the smart headlights that angled in the newer model of my vehicle then it would have been $1000 plus.
"it can get confusing to understand what’s so special about a Mercedes system that only operates on certain stretches of Germany’s Autobahn network, and only up to 60 km/h (37 mph)."
The lane change quote is to describe a level 2 system by contrast, which implies this system can do lane change.
Full quote:
“Right now every other car claiming to have advanced autonomous features is currently only at Level 2 at the most, which means the car can stop steer and brake in certain conditions, but it can’t perform lane changes indecently and the driver can’t remove his hands from the wheel for extended periods.”
But yes, speed limit reduces usefulness to congested traffic situations as also noted in the article.
I'm guessing Mercedes' push in this field is mostly because of their truck segment.
The added BOM increase and potential fat margins on real FSD would be an easy sell in the truck segment.
What we really need is a side-by-side comparison of hardware in the loop simulations & actual ADAS equipped cars, for all levels of autonomy with human drivers for the same situation.
Safety boards of all countries should have autonomous cars and drivers react to real-life accidents and show how each would perform, thereby instilling confidence in public minds and making them aware of human driver lapses as well.
Driving safely needs to be about both - rules to be followed and how to react in adverse situations, the latter of which is never tested rigorously when giving out driving licences.
11 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 25.4 ms ] thread[1] https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Automobiles/Honda-launches-...
If this was the smart headlights that angled in the newer model of my vehicle then it would have been $1000 plus.
Seriously, screw every single automaker today. They have zero respect for their customers by making parts that expensive to replace.
Does usury have a analogy for physical items?
"it can get confusing to understand what’s so special about a Mercedes system that only operates on certain stretches of Germany’s Autobahn network, and only up to 60 km/h (37 mph)."
"but it can’t perform lane changes indecently"
Full quote: “Right now every other car claiming to have advanced autonomous features is currently only at Level 2 at the most, which means the car can stop steer and brake in certain conditions, but it can’t perform lane changes indecently and the driver can’t remove his hands from the wheel for extended periods.”
But yes, speed limit reduces usefulness to congested traffic situations as also noted in the article.
Safety boards of all countries should have autonomous cars and drivers react to real-life accidents and show how each would perform, thereby instilling confidence in public minds and making them aware of human driver lapses as well.
Driving safely needs to be about both - rules to be followed and how to react in adverse situations, the latter of which is never tested rigorously when giving out driving licences.