Ask HN: Favorite Thing Built to Last?

61 points by speedcoder ↗ HN
What is your favorite thing that was built to last? This is, perhaps, a cheesy country song that speaks to the idea https://youtu.be/E4i2fC1U38s . Is "built to last" an obsolete notion? As for me, I still have my father's old original Vise Grip https://livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe40s/machines_12.html .

110 comments

[ 0.22 ms ] story [ 169 ms ] thread
The Snap-On F50CSA driver handle. It's a 3/8" drive driver handle with the socket cap in the head so it can be used as an extension. I bought one off the Snap-On truck back in like 1994 or so and it's been my favorite hand tool ever since. Sadly they don't make this model anymore, so if I ever lose mine then I'm stuffed. Well, maybe you could find a used one on Ebay or whatever, but it would probably cost out the yazoo.

https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/1/0311/29/snap-f5...

The problem with buying used is that Snap-On will no longer fix shit without the original receipt.

I had tens of thousands of dollars of Snap-On tools I bought used over the years, but Snap-On wouldn't touch any of it.

I love my Snap-On tools, and I would buy new when I needed to, but their policy on used equipment left a nasty taste in my mouth.

My HP-11c, one of the Hewlett-Packard calculators, which I have used regularly since 1986

[1] https://www.hpmuseum.org/hp11c.htm

My mother had one of those, I also once borrowed my father's HP graphing calculator for a math test and quickly became unpopular because it beeped every time you hit the wrong key.
The source code for the HN website. That and my 2001 Toyota Corolla.
Gibson Les Paul. They even give you a lifetime warranty

if taken good care, the instrument will outlive you

the best old ones you can find still look like brandnew

edit: if you consider buying, i'd definitely recommend getting a used one

I've always loved the look of them but sitting with one is so uncomfortable for me.
totally agree, not the best choice ergonomically (btw. check out Strandberg Guitars)

mine rarely sees the sunlight because i get tired quickly

but i won't be selling it, the value has skyrocketed ~10-20% since the pandemic

I'm not sure if it's the same in the reliability department, but in 2015 they released a Les Paul "Less+" variant, with a much thinner body than the traditional Les Paul, while otherwise looking identical. It feels very comfortable to play (at least for me), and IMO it makes it a better guitar than the standard Les Paul, although they only seem to have made them for one year. It also has automatic tuning pegs (Gibson G-Force), which is a big quality of life improvement IMO.

(The only issue was the stock nut they give you, it tends to have poor tuning stability... it would grip the wound strings while tuning in a way that makes it hard to arrive at the right pitch. But replacing it with a graphtech tusq synthetic bone nut fixed that issue completely.)

I'm actually in the market for a decent guitar I'll have to try one out. The original hard edge was a little annoying but my main issue is more with how far to the right the guitar sits compared to a Strat, this looks like it might sit the same.
Mostly good, but Jesús that neck is just waiting to be broken. A Strat is much more robust design.
This is our emacs vs vim
except with guitars you can have both!
(comment deleted)
you have to be more careful, it's an instrument

i have mine insured on lemonade.com

design-wise there's also PRS, which gives you a little of both

PRS is a modern version. The string angles and neck are not from the 1950s. Les Pauls are made for wound G strings, those haven't been in regular use in 50 years. Watch this from Get Back... This happens when you play in a band:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FMxlRNrEVo

Wait until you discover violins or flutes...
I think this could be generalized to say that bolt-on necks are more robust than set necks in terms of maintenance over time.

I do tend to agree with that, because over time the tension from the strings will pull up on a neck and make the guitar sound and play poorly. To fix that you have to take the neck off and adjust the angle of it back to the optimal position, which is a big task if the neck is glued on. With a bolt-on unscrewing a few bolts and adding a shim is trivial, using a capo you don't even need to take of the strings.

It's a main reason why I like Taylor acoustic guitars too. The bolt-on shimmed neck makes neck resets a breeze and will keep the guitar playing well for a very long time.

They are beautiful guitars, but I'd argue that the set neck design along with the headstock shape that is prone to snapping off if the guitar tips over isn't great for longevity.
Absolutely love my Les Paul Standard 60's. Sure its not as ergonomic as a Strat and can be a little uncomfortable to play for long periods of time, but there's nothing that sounds like it. I question the people who complain about the headstock design. Yes, its prone to breaking. But this is a $2500+ guitar, what are you doing that makes it so easy to break? I handle my Les Paul as if it were a baby and it's life depended on me.
> edit: if you consider buying, i'd definitely recommend getting a used one

Where's a good place to look for one?

I do hand-tool woodworking. My favorite tool is my Stanley No 8, which I bought locally. It was manufactured around 1900, making it (probably) older than any living human, and is still being put to work.

http://smokingonabike.com/images/woodworking/game_cabinet/bl...

More about old Stanley planes here: http://www.supertool.com/StanleyBG/stan1.htm

I'm also a fan of hand planes. It's worth noting that Lie-Nielsen Toolworks currently makes very, very nice updates of these old designs with blades made of modern tool steel. Arguably they are the best bench planes ever made, even though old Stanley planes are superb. Here's Lie Nielsen's version of the No. 8.[0]

[0] https://www.lie-nielsen.com/products/no-8-jointer-plane?path...

Good planes and chisels are heirlooms if treated well.

Beautiful too. One woodworker I know has a 'slick', a 4" wide so clean you can use it as a stand-in mirror and so sharp that if you're not careful handling it you'll hurt yourself and not even realize it until you see a lot of claret on the shop floor.

He helped me with the windmill blades and trimmed down the back edges with that thing until you could read the newspaper through them (later reinforced with fiber so the wood really served just to determine the outline and any thickness would increase both noise and decrease efficiency).

Amazing tool (and amazing guy).

I have a Stanley 4 1/2 which I've dated to c. the 1890s and several wooden planes which are even older! I cherish them (and my other hand tools).

In a similar vein, no rasp or file will outlast its user just by its nature; nevertheless, Auriou rasps are some of the finest tools I've had the pleasure of owning and run circles around mass-manufactured ones.

I've rescued a few Stanley planes from the rust pile. Bringing them back to life and use is a joy. 100+ years old, and with cleanup and honing, can still take wispy-thin shavings, leaving a glassy-smooth surface on wood.
I have a lot of vintage furniture, picked up from various thrift shops and such. A lot of solid wood stuff. Significantly better than the typical cheaper pressboard/think metal stuff and insanely cheaper than any modern furniture build with solid materials.
My 2005 Prius had one major fault from when I got it in 2012 until this year. It goes to show that sometimes adding complexity can increase reliability. Amazing car.
I felt the same about our 2007 Prius. It never really had any serious problems until we replaced it this year. We ran into one issue this year but it was a known thing that was fairly straightforward to replace, and although not cheap, not that expensive.

My wife wanted to replace it with a newer model because she wanted bluetooth. But I miss my old car -- it was amazingly reliable.

I had a 2004 and I fully agree. Unfortunately had to get rid of it at around 250K miles after some bastards stole the catalytic converter.
Agree. My 2003 Prius was my favorite car ever. Fantastic mileage, and it just worked. If only I'd had a cage around the (very expensive!) catalytic converter, I might still have it.
Older Craftsman tools.

I naively bought some of my own Craftsman tools at Sears back in the 2000s - many of which are cheaply made with plastic bodies, or non-durable bits. Basically every Torx screwdriver I bought there is now stripped. The cases are plastic, and use friction to keep tools in place - not that they stay in place anymore.

Contrast that with the '60s or '70s tools with the lifetime warranties (that I inherited from my grandfather, by way of my father having his own set already), which show age only in the "vintage" look. They're just as functional as I assume they were on day one. Everything's made of either steel, lacquered wood, or in rare cases, heavy-feeling plastic.

Snap-On has had similar high quality and great lifetime warranties

Can't speak to what they're currently doing though

Outlier Slim Dungarees. Probably has 10x the lifetime of a pair of jeans.

Not built to last in the sense that you'll hand these trousers down to your grandchildren, but built to last in that they're made with a Nylon-Poly blend that is insanely durable. I probably have 600 wears on a single pair, and while some of the stitching at the pockets has come loose, the textile itself shows no signs of blowing out in the knees.

I love the old South Bend and Atlas Lathes and Mills. I'm amazed that a machine made 100 Years ago can remain functional and as useful as it was on it's first day. It reminds me of the importance of maintenance.
I donated an old South Bend that I restored when I left Canada to a United States friend living in the Rockies. Put it on blocks in the back of the pickup and drove it all the way there under a tarp. That was quite the trip. But I was really happy to find a community of people that were sure to put it to good use.

I really loved that little lathe, as long as you went easy on the feeds it would work just fine. No play at all in spite of being ancient.

This might not be what you had in mind, but the web framework Django. It's been around for ages and doesn't change in dramatic ways. It's not perfect by any means, but it just works and is reasonably easy to understand and extend if you spend the time to read through its code.

The documentation is good, but I find that it's a little overrated. There are lots of gaps, so spending the time reading through Django's code will pay dividends, especially when it comes to customizing it for your needs.

After years of churning through all sorts of Javascript frameworks, I know that I can build something in Django and only need to spend real maintenance time once every 2 years or so during an LTS release.

I'll then go with C . For a language designed more than 50 years ago, it has withstood the test of time pretty impressively.

It's a breath of fresh air to write software in C to do some low level device development for someone who spends his life in high level web frameworks.

I have a game I built for a homework in university. After 5 years of react, I picked it up and try to run it on my MacBook. I just had to edit a few files and got it working again. C has this expressiveness in it where everything is exposed to the reader. No complicated abstractions, just data structures and code.
I love that you named a coding framework. I was not in this mindset when answering the question.
I'll then go with SQL. It's been around forever and evolves slowly and stably.

You (almost) never need any frameworks, imports, boilerplate or glue, everything that works just works.

And according to Star Trek Discovery, it will still be around in 250 years. Sadly though, SQL injections will still be a thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7B_ZWQFsYI

An Italian friend gave me his very old Bialetti moka pot coffee maker. It has a patina from use but is otherwise in perfect shape. The thing won't make a bad cup of coffee and it won't die.
These things are built to last indeed. It’s the no 1 item I pack when I go camping
My parents have a cast aluminium one - it’s cracked and older than me but still makes an excellent cup. The only thing that will retire it will be induction cooking!
Weber grills, Global kitchen knives.

Doc Marten boots used to be the same and a pair lasted me through 8 Glastonbury Festival years. They then went cheap, moved offshore and were crap. Luckily Solovair took up the old tooling iirc and are just like old DMs. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solovair

Thanks for the Solovair mention, the Mrs is currently going through the process of buying Docs (online, so stacks of boots in the hall) and I think I've convinced her to give them a go. I do enjoy a well-made boot.
No problem. The original DMs I had for Glastonbury were amazing, only ditched them when cleaning looked so horrific I gave up.

The replacements didn't even last a single festival.

You can occasionally find Solovair cheaper at TK Maxx or on Hotukdeals, if it helps.

I should also add Herman Miller Aeron Chair

12 Years of Warranty, but expect it to last well beyond that

They definitely last longer than most servers. And than the start-ups that bought them when they were new...
yeah, that's actually the reason i've got one

as a constant reminder that startups fail

I bought mine for $.10 on the dollar...
My 30+ years old Sony Walkman Sports still works and looks perfect. Is is amazing since there are resin pads and the the belt in it that I never cared to change.

Kids played with it for a while until they grew up. I think I will pass it to the next generation like a Rolex.

Street lights. They have surprisingly high availability with a failure mode that results in some reduced efficiency for traffic management.
It is hard to say what my favourite is, but the notion appeals to me immensely. There is a dedicated subreddit for that, /r/BuyItForLife.

I own a 1967 BelOMO-produced (Soviet union, now Belarus) Helios 44 lens. It is quite small compared to modern lenses but made entirely out of metal and glass and is the thing that I would guess will outlive me. These lenses have gotten popular in the recent years because of it's "character" (optically they're quite terrible).

Peugeot Paris pepper grinder. I've seen them used in restaurants, I doubt I'll be able to make a dent in the durability of the burrs with my home use. It looks quite retro and doesn't really fit my aesthetic but it feels so damn nice to use that other pepper grinders feel like toys.

My cast iron dutch oven. Keeping tabs on the castiron subreddit, there's quite a lot of cast iron heirlooms being handed down generations which are just as usable today as when they were newly bought. I use mine for baking bread.
I have one of the first model of Husqvarna 372 chainsaws that came out in '99 or 2000. My dad used it for six or seven years professionally as a logger before he handed it down to me, and I've put, at a conservative estimate, 1000 more hours on it since then. Still runs like a top.
Hi-Fi speakers - mine aren't particularly wow, but I've had them (and my brother has had his) since the mid-late 2000's, getting daily usage when possible and moving through multiple countries, in and out of storage. They've been run on different amps/receivers, but we've both kept our speakers consistent.
Good pair of handmade American boots. Bought a pair of Chippewa for about $500 several years ago. Aside from the occasional resole, the leather only looks better with age -- and all you need is a good polish and brush to get them ready. You can also dress them up or down, depending on the occasion.

In my opinion, shoes are some of the few things you should splurge on -- but do look at build quality, and not just a brand name. For example, some of the higher end Timberlands will run you about $250-$350. Despite the high-price they are cheaply mass-produced in China, and the build quality reflects that.

I love my Mephisto shoes. Originally bought them in 92 and one resole later am still wearing them most every day.
Fadal VMC40 CNC mill. Mine is a 1984, making it one of the first ones made.

This was one of the first wave of CNC machines made and priced for a smaller job shop environment. It's not large (axis travels are 20" X, 16" Y) and it's not fast by modern standards (slow travel, max 10k rpm spindle speed). However, it's easy to use, not over-complicated, rigid with box ways, and DIY repairable. There are several places to get affordable parts and support. I have yet to encounter a component that is "no longer available," a common occurrence on other machinery. I've had a specialist out to inspect it when I got the machine, but other than that I've been able to fix and maintain it easily. Besides, very little has gone wrong with it, and I started running it hard straight out of a 20 year hibernation.

The control electronics are built with a backplane design that makes it extremely simple to swap and upgrade components. The control boards themselves are made with all through-hole components, making board-level repairs easier. I upgraded the main control board from a '84 version to a '95 version in about 30 minutes (gaining speed and a lot of UI improvements). If I wanted, I could retrofit a fully modern control system in a couple hours. If you're not in the industry this may not sound significant, but if you're familiar with CNC machines this is huge for prolonging the life of a machine. For comparison, older Haas control boards are known to fail and the only current recourse is to pay Haas about $20k for a full retrofit by a factory tech.

The interface is text based and runs on a CRT but it's incredibly simple, ergonomic and easy to learn. Discoverability is excellent, with built-in documentation and useful error messages. If Siemens and Fanuc CNC controllers are emacs and vim, Fadal is nano. If the battery backup goes bad, I can restore the control parameters using a human-readable menu with meaningful variable names in about 5 minutes from memory. On my Mazak lathe, this takes hours of entering hex codes into numbered fields. In comparison to other machines I've used, the Fadal feels like it's made to be used by machinists, not gatekept by factory service techs and expensive training courses.

The worst part of the machine is that it has a total loss mist lubrication system for the spindle, which requires added ventilation otherwise it will fill the shop up with oil mist. I would also like a full enclosure, which mine doesn't have but later ones do. But other than that it's incredibly resilient, high quality and simple machine, the likes of which simply aren't being made anymore.

There's little things that are built to last scattered all over my home and office. A chunk are inherited from previous generations others are unsuspecting items I bought that just keep chugging (I'm looking at you $9 toaster from Walmart). I have a few things that I've bought that I really hope they are built to last -- part of my motivation to purchase was this quality.

Of course building things to last isn't obsolete. Most things we buy are for a purpose. Typically that purpose results in them being "used up". Socks get holes, mechanisms wear -- all of that is normal and expected. Periodically through either some extra care or happenstance the item doesn't get used up in an expected period of time. It seems it was BUILT TO LAST, over time our kids and dependents will marvel at the way things used to be built. Some day in 40 years someone will look at your Aeropress and bemoan, is "built to last" obsolete?