3 comments

[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 17.4 ms ] thread
We've built an algorithm that analyses historical data of 38,000 VC funds and suggests relevant investors for startups (seed, round A, B and C). We use an innovative approach, scoring instead of filtering. You only need to fill in the questionnaire. We will search among 300,000+ deals in the database to find the funds investing in startups like yours. The funds are given points each time there's a match with your questionnaire.

What you can do with us:

1. get a list of relevant VC investors completely for free

2. save the funds you like to favorites to check them out later and compare

3. get a list of all available decision makers in the funds

4. see contact details of relevant decision makers (GDPR doesn’t allow sharing emails publicly but we can give you email formation rules that you can turn easily into actual emails)

5. send chosen funds to our email outreach system to start a fundraising-optimized email campaign.

TIL there are 38K funds. That's 10-30 times more than I expected.
Could you please explain why you’re expecting less funds?

Can the broader set miss better match than narrower can suggest?