3 comments

[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 21.2 ms ] thread
This, in my opinion is an excellent text detailing how we arrived at the FAA/FCC C-Band face off. I believe it also answers many of the questions raised in this thread: "Boeing, Airbus executives urge delay in U.S. 5G wireless deployment" [0].

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29642222

I like it but was resistant to the glib claim contained in that ‘spectrum is scarce in the U.S.’.

I can’t speak for microwave spectrum but I know a lot about the land between 50Mhz and 1 GHz because I have travelled with a scanner and I can say that UHF/VHF is crowded on the west coast but practically fallow on the East coast. L.A. seems to have more hams speaking Cambodian on the 2 meter band in a few blocks of L.A. than you hear total in the NYC metro area. The TV industry killed whit spaces because there are no white spaces in LA (get 100+ digital sub channel with a cheap antenna) but even in ‘crowded’ New England you find that the nearest city is too far to get good reception but too close for them to put a transmitter in closer to you. It is almost all white space on the east coast even in crowded areas…. Go to the mountains 200 miles inland and it is a RF dead spot bigger than most countries.

Aviation is becoming a backwater of technology.

They still use leaded gas for piston planes.

Their answer to global warming is to make ‘green’ jet fuel by using painfully slow and expensive Fischer-Tropsch chemistry to build up hydrocarbons rather than switch to something reasonable like alcohols, dimethyl ether or methane. Ground transportation is 20-30 years ahead of aviation in terms of sustainable fuels but in the backwater of aviation they are too afraid to make any changes at all in fuels.