Ask HN: Could we have created and 'distributed' a variant faster than vaccines?
Leaving aside the ethical dilemma, could science have created and 'distributed' (by that is meant 'allow to spread') a variant of a virus that is far preferable to an original virus, such that the new variant becomes the dominant strain very quickly, with far milder symptoms, and that confers immunity after recovery? Say we created Omicron light in March of 2020, or soon thereafter, would that have saved lives?
2 comments
[ 1.9 ms ] story [ 17.6 ms ] threadNow for the possibility to do it. Remember that vaccines took months of testing before getting approved, which is way faster than usual. And yet, with a vaccine, you don't have to worry about spread, mutations, etc... If you inject a really bad vaccine the worst that can happen is for test subjects to die. Now, try working with a live virus instead, you realize that your "safe but easy to spread" virus is not that safe after all, oops, no recall possible, you just killed millions of people. And even if your virus really is safe, viruses mutate, and despite what many people are saying, not always to become less lethal.
Really, I think we are lucky that Omicron turned out the way it did, it could have been much worse and it can become much worse. I don't think we should look further than that, it is just luck.