6 comments

[ 5.0 ms ] story [ 22.3 ms ] thread
Linkbait.
How would this be linkbait? Unless you mean "interesting for developers who aren't using GCC or Clang."
I think they mean the headline is linkbait. The article has a positive tone, while the headline is extremely negative.
It is unfair to expect VC11 to have super C++11 support, it has just been a standard for a few months. Building compilers take time, maybe a more positive headline next time?
I think it's unfair to expect C++11 support when they are still working on C99 support.
This title is broken; hopefully someone can fix the blatant editorializing it does.

Further, in what world do compiler vendors get this stuff in that quickly? Do you, the poster and editorial title-modifier understand all the implications of these new changes and their interaction with existing code and existing libraries? If you do, you are likely in very small, expert company.