Or when you get the good old "give us your phone and unlock it or we beat you with a wrench" treatment, which bypasses any sort of encryption altogether.
Off-the-Record Messaging uses deniable authentication to fix this problem. Instead of proving that a message could only have come from the real sender, it proves that it must have come from either the sender or the recipient. If you are the recipient, you know you didn't write it, but you have no way to prove that to anyone else.
I suspect the reply is saying a western notion of civility is irrelevant because the woman in question, and those like her, are acting against 'the core of civilization' as they know it.
906 Million in foreign aid to Pakistan by the US. Giving taxpayer money to an oppressive regime that believes it is okay to order a woman to her death for a cartoon seems inappropriate.
Congress values your feedback and would love to here your thoughts on this topic:
Per the article, many of those accused of blasphemy don’t even make it to the courthouse before vigilante justice happens, and if they do judges are pressured to convict and impose harsh sentences, as in this case. So, it’s not just the government, it’s the culture as well which can’t be easily be changed with funding threats.
Also, the funding probably won’t just disappear. Another world power (or powers) would likely step in to fill that influence vacuum. Plenty of rich countries out there that already severely punish people for their speech and happy to defend the power of the state over the people.
Still, it does puzzle me how much money we give to countries with drastically different values.
26 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 60.7 ms ] threadAnd Signal also has deniable authentication, although its protocol is a bit different than Off-the-Record Messaging.
Congress values your feedback and would love to here your thoughts on this topic:
https://www.congress.gov/contact-us
Don't forget to look up their voting records before calling so you can ask why.
Aneeqa Ateeq shouldn't be murdered over a cartoon.
Do you think Pakistan would overturn blasphemy law if it were threatened or the funds taken away?
Do you think a more liberal and prosperous government would form were the current regime overthrown?
They need 0 US tax payer dollars.
Yes
Also, the funding probably won’t just disappear. Another world power (or powers) would likely step in to fill that influence vacuum. Plenty of rich countries out there that already severely punish people for their speech and happy to defend the power of the state over the people.
Still, it does puzzle me how much money we give to countries with drastically different values.
Hundreds of men rotting in Pakistani jails on false blasphemy charges waiting execution, and the aid should be stopped because a woman was sentenced?