My friends couldn't understand why it pissed me off the way it did. Actually, I'm not sure myself... But it's just insulting that they would blame their shortcomings on a completely innocent third party, and to me it violates some unwritten, unspoken law of developers. Hackers just don't do this to other hackers. No ifs or buts, no two ways about it.
It's different because this new message is factually incorrect. "neosmart.net is not responding" means something completely different that what is actually happening; if you open neosmart.net in a different browser, I'd bet everything would operate as normal. What's actually happening is that IE10 isn't stable enough to handle whatever the website is doing, and IE10 stops responding. But instead of admitting that, they blame the website.
Now, this might be happening in part because the website has some bad code, but in 2011 there's absolutely no way any website should be able to crash a browser. That's just crazy. Given that the browser is crashing, that's 100% of the fault of the browser and no blame at all should go to the site.
At the very least, IE should isolate the problem to the particular tab and not crash.
cryptoz: Remember that your statement is completely false.
There is nothing what is true about what you said.
This is what is correct: There exists an error.
This is what are acceptable behaviors for a browser:
- It may choose to crash
- It may ignore the error and continue on its merry way
Now assume that that you said that "a browser should not crash to faulty code". Given that a browser implements something like that, then there can exist a severe faulty security hole.
If anything, IE was correct in crashing. It's just not very humanly-desirable for it to crash. And if it crashed, perhaps, it should just crash the "part" that was affected and restart it.
That is the only decently "perhaps correct" solution.
7 comments
[ 4.6 ms ] story [ 31.4 ms ] threadNow, this might be happening in part because the website has some bad code, but in 2011 there's absolutely no way any website should be able to crash a browser. That's just crazy. Given that the browser is crashing, that's 100% of the fault of the browser and no blame at all should go to the site.
At the very least, IE should isolate the problem to the particular tab and not crash.
There is nothing what is true about what you said.
This is what is correct: There exists an error. This is what are acceptable behaviors for a browser: - It may choose to crash - It may ignore the error and continue on its merry way
Now assume that that you said that "a browser should not crash to faulty code". Given that a browser implements something like that, then there can exist a severe faulty security hole.
If anything, IE was correct in crashing. It's just not very humanly-desirable for it to crash. And if it crashed, perhaps, it should just crash the "part" that was affected and restart it.
That is the only decently "perhaps correct" solution.