4 comments

[ 0.34 ms ] story [ 23.4 ms ] thread
Well thought out blog post that made me think. Not your typical antivac microchip stuff at all.
> People often use arguments like “but it’s not statistically significant” to try to discount results. I even hear people with PhDs or MDs say this, because somewhere in their schooling they were falsely taught that results need to be “statistically significant” to be “real.”

Ok I stopped reading halfway through.

How did this garbage obvious misinformation make it to the front page?