Ask HN: Why the obsession with note taking?

252 points by dmje ↗ HN
If there's one thing absolutely guaranteed to get a gazillion comments on HN, it's a post about either 1) note taking software, 2) note taking methodology 3) a combination of the two.

I'm kinda fascinated by this, in large part because I'm sucked in by it too. I can't count the number of apps I've tried, or the dopamine rush when installing a new one.

What's this about? Do we all secretly believe we can be truly better people if we can just get this right? Or are we just endlessly curious about what everyone else does? Tell me, I need to understand myself better!

218 comments

[ 0.29 ms ] story [ 324 ms ] thread
A big part of a software engineer’s job is to organize data. Notes are data. Usually very personal data that we understand completely. If we can’t even organize that right, then what hope do we have?

It’s professional pride.

It taps into so many productivity desires we have. In reality very few people are probably good at keeping notes and organising them well, yet we all want to be better and feel like note taking utopia and external organised brain is just over the next productivity summit.

It’s a hard problem to solve and that leads to many people “having a go” at it.

All notetaking apps are disappointing with the possibile exception of Obsidian that I haven't tried long enough to have an opinion on.

There's no open source standard. No LibreOffice or Krita of notetaking.

They all only have a small subset of features one might want.

And yet they are critical infrastructure for people's entire life. It's a pretty exciting space.

Logseq seems promising.
I think all notetaking apps are a sort of function of their environment, too, because they all benefit enormously from ubiquity.

So for me as a long-time Mac user (and rather less long-time iPhone/iPad user), the realistic benchmark is Apple Notes: it is simplistic, fast, well-integrated and ubiquitous. It has just enough features to be useful and not enough features to be opinionated.

Absent the iPhone side of things, I'd likely use Simplenote.

> There's no open source standard.

I hope, at some point, something akin to another enhanced subset of Markdown will become the de-facto standard.

The markdown-based apps like obsidian are probably on the right track, but there’s too much dogma associated with methodologies like zettelkasten today that it just it’s probably a deterrent for some people.

For those who just want a generic and easy to use app like OneNote, they’re not going to find it in Obsidian.

> For those who just want a generic and easy to use app like OneNote, they’re not going to find it in Obsidian.

That's not an accurate statement. Obsidian can literally be as simple as one wants it to be, or as sophisticated in virtually any direction. The culty "Zettelkasten" emphasis is entirely coming from the community and can be totally ignored (as I do).

> There's no open source standard. No LibreOffice or Krita of notetaking.

There's UTF-8 and JPEG.

That's more like the vim or nano of notetaking!
Vim is the Vim of notetaking.
I went through that phase.

I've stopped trying to get it _right_ and I just focus on actually doing it.

Simplenote, Things and Apple Notes get the closest to doing what I need; I've used only the latter for several years now (despite the egregious alternate lowercase A and all the yellow).

My guess is that we all think that the right application can save us from the failings of (or failure to consult) our notes, when the truth is that it's note-taking discipline that wins the day, not functionality.

The main thing I took from all of my searches through the world of notes apps is that if you don't write almost all your notes (and especially your to-do actions) as complete sentences, you're failing right out of the gate, no matter what app you write in.

Because when people try to over-engineer something as simple at writing notes, they can loop on it forever.
> What's this about? Do we all secretly believe we can be truly better people if we can just get this right?

I think so. In the end I just use Google Keep for mundane things like grocery lists (haven't found anything better for that, checkboxes and autocompletes most common items so it's quick) or random ideas I have (it's easy since it's on a phone and cloud). For programming shit it's todos in a readme in the repository. It's more about the act of writing it down than any feature in any app.

So much of the chaos of day to day work is an inability of organizations to make decisions and even after making the decision, remembering enough of it the next day or even next hour to use the information. When it comes to spreading that over a year or after someone departs, forget it.

There is also enormous inefficiency caused by covering the same ground over and over again, but it happens quite frequently as nothing survives from one discussion to the next. In addition, lots of decisions get made in side Slack channels.

There are some massive gains here to be had if this can be solved.

As a counterpoint, one can view this as a feature and not a bug. An organization that fastidiously remembers everything might soon drown itself in memories, as it attempts to fit every new piece of information into the context of all memories. Much like a human savant could end up effectively paralyzed by frequently recollections of irrelevant trivia.

Obviously there’s a middle ground between the above and the “amnesia” that many orgs seem to suffer from, but digging into the actual causes of the amnesia and confusion often reveals it’s not due to missing tools (off either the software or organizational variety)

Well this is part of the unsolved problem. How can you take notes and organize themin a high density way that you don't drown yourself in them?
Fair, and it’s fun to imagine novel approaches to addressing it with tools. I guess I better start creating my own now…
True, both people and organisations have to remember things. But when it comes to organisations, I think the existence of a separate task called "note taking" is often a symptom of slow software development and data modeling.

Individuals sometimes take notes to collect random ideas. That's fine. I do that too. No one other than myself could ever make sense of my notes though, and sometimes not even I can.

When organisations take notes in prose form, it is unlikely that anyone will ever have time to read them in order the extract the parts relevent for a particular task. There are of course exceptions. Someone will surely read the FOMC minutes.

There has to be a deliberate process of modeling and collecting structured data so it can be queried and transformed into something that facilitates specific decisions. At that point, it's no longer called note taking.

In my view, it is this sort of ad hoc data modeling that is too inefficient right now. It's something I'm on working on, but I can't claim to have found any silver bullets yet.

> There has to be a deliberate process of modeling and collecting structured data so it can be queried and transformed into something that facilitates specific decisions. At that point, it's no longer called note taking.

This is one of those aspirational things that should exist, like automated testing. In practice, many places are just reliant on people knowing stuff.

I feel like note taking/personal knowledge bases are still an unsolved problem (with many attempts) and there will be a disruptive technology in this sphere at some point.

People often take a shot at this problem, which makes for the monthly or bimonthly thread on HN, but I think there's still a lot of room for innovation.

I use note taking to think. With a good process and sharp tools, writing let's me solve harder problems, better.

And I do want to think better.

Currently really happy with Slack, Org-mode and Roam Research, each for its own use.

I think taking notes to remember important things is just in our nature. I have yet to find a piece of note taking software that will prevent my opening up a dozen Notepad instances and leaving them open (unsaved) for all eternity...

I take notes to remember TODOs, to draft communication, to write random crap I want to come back to. Sometimes I don't even come back to it, but somehow writing it down still helps.

I started using Obsidian which has been nice, but feels a bit clunky in a lot of ways on Windows...I'm hoping to find something more lightweight.

Absolutely, in 20 odd years my muscle memory still opens notepad and the only thing I would love is some kind of autosave/persistence across devices as I always have a dread when occasionally I lose stuff on a crash or something.

However when I think about it this may be why notepad still works for me, it doesn't become overwhelming. I've tried to use quite a few systems over the years and the trajectory is always the same - it starts great but the unresolved tasks accumulate until the whole thing seems inefficient or pointless or just overwhelming.

In a round about Notepad along with occasional data loss solves that problem for me :D

After leaving my comment a few days ago I was reminded of a web-based note taking system I remembered using years ago called Workflowy, so I went back and checked it out. I learned that they now have a desktop app and it provides a very simple, lightweight workflow for jotting down notes. It feels less bulky than Obsidian and more manageable than the Notepad windows. In fact, right now I only have two Notepad instances open instead of my usual 10 or 15, which maybe is saying something...

We'll see if I stick with it for more than a few days.

As Stephen King has said, and Edgar Allen Poe as well, in a different way, writing something down is the perfect way to make sure you keep bad ideas around. I’m not against all notetaking, but I do believe that doing it by default does have some drawbacks.
In that vein, writing something down helps empty my head. And the process of writing things down is like rubber-ducking, whereby I might soon find the idea to be bad and away it goes.
I'm not entirely sure I get his meaning - which I take to be using your memory to filter for good ideas. Sounds like something a savant would say, not realizing they have an unusual brain.

But I bet Stephen King types his novels, rather than dictating them to his editor from memory. Jay Z is said (by himself and numerous collaborators) not to write his lyrics down. He writes them in his head, and recites them from his head in the studio.

I can't remember any ideas that originate in my head, that I haven't seen with my eyes. Except for those thrice-in-a-lifetime level ideas. I've tried the "if it's good I'll remember it" approach literally hundreds of times, and maybe retained three of those. I've had more than three good ideas in my life. I don't only want to remember the A+++ ones. I want the A++ ones, the A+ ones, and so on, so that I can work on refining them. Note taking apps are really handy for refining.

multitude of reasons:

* We operate on gigantic sets of data (not from CS perspective, average human consumes more data in 10 years than avg man in his lifetime only few decades ago)

* Reasoning about data is not easy, and storing what matters is crucial in being effective worker/citizen/parent/etc.

* Promo of zettelkasten

* Good money too? Making note-taking app is not as difficult as coming up with novel startup and takes less time and money

* Internet figures promoting it (David Perell)

* Feels like we've done something without too much effort (motion vs action by James Clear - https://jamesclear.com/taking-action)

* This is the way to create articles and papers - most of the tech are not writers and their writings had happened naturally and by some impulse/itch. To repeat that we cannot rely on these forces all the time

* You can make your own personal wiki which can be the new blog, feels sexy for tech (whereas other people are doing that by cultivating their ig/fb profiles)

I think it's partly the fantasy of having all the information you need at your fingertips. Surely if we had the right software, it would be possible!

In practice effort is probably much more important than software features, but we blame the software we've tried instead of our own lack of effort at making good notes, and keep looking for that hypothetical perfect tool.

Personally I don't even put in enough effort to install these tools, but I look at articles about them anyway, and futilely wish I had better access to my information.

It's just a pragmatic desire to transfer your memory and knowledge to a digital form. Current digital access interfaces are very primitive in comparison to what we can do in our mind.
For me it's a combination of two factors. I recognize that well-written notes is a really valuable thing to have because there's a ton of things I need to know about and I won't remember it all, and I know that it's a lot of work to codify things well because I've tried and failed. I strongly suspect that, for me, "taking notes" is the problem. I want to believe I'll remember things, so note taking actually represents a failure on my part rather than the virtuous thing that I know I should do.

I think the answer for me is actually to share what I write with my team more. I'm quite good at documenting things, and the reason for that is because I'm writing docs for other people. If people mention seeing something in the docs then I tend to write more docs. If no one mentions them for a while my documenting dies off until I need to write more. If I could easily apply that mechanism to notes I might be more inclined to write things down.

I love note taking. The act of writing something down gives me so much insight and clarity. It's similar to trying to explain something to other people, it requires a much deeper understanding.

Even if I don't share it with anyone it helps me figure stuff out. I don't read back 90% of what I write, the writing itself is what provides most value to me. Although it can be handy to dig into the archives to understand my thinking of months back.

Tooling wise; I like handwriting, as I can draw arrows and quick sketches. I used to always carry an A5 notebook around, now I use an iPad with Apple Pencil (recently upgraded to the new mini which is perfect A5'ish size).

Apps I use on the iPad are; GoodNotes for actual notes and Concepts for more visual sketching and such.

If I need to take notes that I need to share I generally use https://nota.md which is imo by far the best markdown note taking experience available. Think of it as a markdown editor with code editor features (e.g. multi cursor). It also works with normal markdown files so no lock in.

When on my phone I use the Notes app on.

Yes, lots of tools, but I find different tools are best for different things. It does means everything is spread around, but it works for me, it's sort of an organized chaos, I can find stuff when I need to.

I think the joy comes from the idea of maintaining all information, of "getting your shit together" in a way. I think most humans truly enjoy collecting and organizing things. Notes, similarly to todos, bookmarks, lists etc are just tools to scratch that itch, the more the better!

> Tooling wise; I like handwriting, as I can draw arrows and quick sketches.

If you ever decided you want to go full digital, I highly recommend checking out the tablets from https://remarkable.com/. My wife has the same approach to handwritten notes and loves it! I can confirm that when writing on the reMarkable 2 tablet, you can forget that it is not pen and paper. I particularly enjoy being able to take notes on it in the margins when reading a book...

I was debating between that one and the iPad mini! Sounds like an awesome device, must be great for reading as well.

The main reason I went for the iPad mini was the size (and apps maybe). Before I had an iPad Air 10.5 inch, and it was just too big for my use, it made it inconvenient.

I'm still debating getting one anyway. It has that "coolness factor", and I want it haha.

If they ever produce a smaller version I am pretty sure I can not resist.

If size was the only issue, there is also the Supernote A5X (and A6X for that matter) which I've been thinking about, but think I've decided against as it feels like a bit of a halfway house between real paper and an ipad

But for you, it might be perfect

Oh wow! That looks really nice. For reading and such an e-ink display seems nicer. Very tempting haha, I might order one.

Can also recommend an iPad btw. Besides being an excellent note taking device it does all sorts of other cool stuff.

(If for note taking/drawing; I suggest get one that supports Apple Pencil 2, it's a big improvement.)

I've got the Supernote A5X and can highly recommend it! (I had bought the RM2 before but returned it – in my book, the Supernote is much better.)
The RM size is an advantage IMHO! It is very thin and does not feel "chunky", but the screen is large enough to be very comfortable for reading and writing (pretty much the same size as a normal notebook page).

The main differentiator between the RM and other tablets (such as iPad), besides the excellent "write on e-ink" interface, is that the RM device is very committed to a minimalistic approach. There are lots of "features" that would be trivial for them to implement (notifications, email, messaging, socials, etc) that they have deliberately chosen not to support in the official software. Instead, the RM is focused on only providing the cleanest approach to reading and note taking. This approach is perfect for some people's desires and use cases, but not for everyone...

It's impossible to make a one-size-fits-all device. For me, the Remarkable is too small. I wish they would come out with an A4-sized display. That's the size of paper I generally take notes on and it's the native size for most PDFs.
It's worth noting that the Remarkable2 has placed a lot of the best features (namely, syncing via the internet) behind an $8 a month subscription. It pushed me away from it.
Yes, writing a note is a debriefing session for what you were doing/thinking about. And like a debriefing the sooner you can do it afterwards, the more valuable it can be.
why nota and not obsidian ?
For me, and this is very subjective of course, I prefer the most simple but solid editor, and Nota's editor is great. The little things; excellent preview editor, cmd + d to multi cursor select the next occurrence, option + up/down to move lines around, just like in VSCode. It just gets out of the way and let me do my thing.

Also what I missed in Obsidian when I tried it. I will also simply not use all of its fancy features, not to say they aren't useful, just that I'm not that organized haha.

I also really like how Nota looks; neutral, under styled, minimal. This is oddly important to me haha.

Nothing against Obsidian though, it seems to really excel in its purpose of knowledge base building.

Note taking itself is an interesting thing but also a robust and usable 'my-archive.org' experience. That's where all notetaking solutions fail for me; I can take notes and organize info, but in 5 years, all of it will be lost or at least not in a usable form. I have tried a lot of apps, but nothing really works over time. Everything works for 'today'; that's nice, but deo volente I am around 10-20 years from now (as I am 20 years after 2000 when I also took notes which are worthless now because broken links, images, not searchable etc).
My deep dark secret is that I never take notes. Not for lack of trying, I just don't know how to do it. I never did it at school, never did it at work, never did it outside of work. I'm in my mid-thirties now, I just gave up on the concept.

Every time I see a post on HN about how somebody manages to organize their lives around a personal wiki or org-mode or whatever I get a bit jealous.

Me too, I can't imagine the discipline, skill and time it takes to be organized like that (or at all tbh).
I'm on the same boat, I managed to work with GTD method on trello for a bit, but I gave up.

Thing is, after all these years, I actually think I don't need to take notes, that's why my mind doesn't feel like it's worth it in the end to organize everything into notes, when I rarely forgot about something.

I just use one physical calendar at home, and flags in outlook at work, and I'm fine.

Same, but I never tried. Back in school we were encouraged to take notes during lectures, but I found that if I was focused on note taking them I wouldn't take in any of what was presented to me, and my notes would be useless. No note taking software even comes close to how my brain works either. Of the few notes I've actually taken I've never gone back to read them again. Sure, I will forget stuff, but I feel like in most instances I can just go back and relearn them faster than the time I would have wasted on taking notes, categorizing them and making them searchable.
Yeah, I take lots of notes (https://dercuano.github.io/ for example), but I can't take notes during lectures. I figure the people who are taking notes during the lecture must be a lot smarter than I am, because if I try to take notes during the lecture, writing distracts me and I lose the thread of the lecture.
Same for me. I never took notes in classes. It interferes with listening. It's usually quite unnecessary, since the information is in the textbook, or other readily accessible references.

The one time this policy was challenging was for a numerical analysis course I took where there was no textbook. So I had to go off to the library to find books that covered the topics discussed (this was back before the internet). This actually teaches you more than taking notes.

Every time I set something up I later forget to actually use it when I get the info that should be saved.

One thing I'm able to successfully track are meetings and appointments in google calendar.

Work stuff is usually tracked on jira/github issues, and when I see the issue I usually remember all the context that was established when creating the issue - if it was internal, so I have no problems there.

FWIW, like everything else in life, you only learn how to do something, and get good at doing something, by doing that something. You say you tried, but then follow up with "I never did it at X".

Take notes. Fuck it up. Figure out why your attempt wasn't useful to you. Take more notes. Rinse, repeat, and you too can eventually take notes that are valuable to you.

EDIT: One thing I forgot - taking and reviewing notes takes time. Dedicate time to both steps, and to identifying how to improve.

I think people are interested in these tools, because they help them mitigate stress from cognitive load: If you have written it down, you don't have the fear of losing your thought.

For me personally, writing notes down is indeed the most important step. I don't read most of the notes ever again :)

A nice UX gives dopamine bonus points for this act of getting peace of mind.

My interest in the subject is mostly that I've not yet found a system that I can work with, I'm absolutely terrible at taking notes, and at using the notes I take, to the point where I don't even know where or what they are.

I'm also terrible at identifying which information to note down, and inconsistent in even attempting to identify it.

So I'm following the topic out of curiosity that a tool might appear that will truly argument my disorganized mind with the skill and dicipline of organization.

I've found Dendron interesting, and have started using it a bit, but I feel it's not "ambient" enough, I need something that interacts extremely well with my phone, home computer and work computer, and is not cloud based.

> If there's one thing absolutely guaranteed to get a gazillion comments on HN, it's a post about either 1) note taking software, 2) note taking methodology 3) a combination of the two.

> Ask HN: Why the Obsession with Note Taking?

Is this some sort of social experiment? (I shall not be suc-- oh, damn!)

For me it's notes but more the closely related to-dos, and I'm always interested because it's something I want to be better at doing (from a very low starting point of almost never having anything up to date written down) but never quite manage or find myself happy with methods/apps/sites I can find.

A while ago I decided/realised my personal preference would be GitHub issues, trouble is I need them to do two things:

1. Implement 'projects' in the mobile app - https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions/5609

2. Option to auto-add all my repos to a project - https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions/6258

then I'll be happy, shall stop obsessing over it, and stop upvoting and participating in these threads. /s

My take - note taking is a symtom of ADHD. The fact these topics are popular on HN suggests there are quite a lot of ADHD people here.

The counter intuitive thing is that these apps are thought of as something that helps with attention disorders. But wanting to "organize life", "track thoughts and ideas", "never forget what you learned", etc, are symptoms, not cures.

Do you not have a need to regularly record information in your life for later (genuine question)? I am curious how you avoid note taking without forgetting a ton of things.
I'm not the person you're directing the question to, but I actively have to self medicate so I don't remember every thing.

I also need to take notes to raise the important things above the useless things that I remember.

I am not sure if I understood this question but with unmedicated ADHD you really have to write everything down, even the smallest, simplest tasks, and a lot of information for "future me". I even have to write about things that I do every day. Nothing really sticks in your mind. Notetaking is not a choice but a neccesity. When you are medicated you still want to take notes it you want to be even more organized but you can choose not too and probably be fine like a lot of other people without ADHD.
As far as I know I do not have ADHD. I still find it quite useful to write everything down and make sure that I completed everything I needed to do that day. Very easy to forget to reply to someone or that some small thing has a deadline upcoming.

If I really care about the meetings I attended being useful (not often), I will take notes on what is discussed and decided.

Having recently started medication for ADHD, this applied to me.

Now that my brain operates more closely to my neurotypical peers, I've found myself not needing to take constant notes and review my day in order to remember things.

I have ADHD and for me note taking has always been a novelty; like todo lists. I get excited about it, I forget about it the next day. Most days I kept thinking "I should write this down", and then didn't. But now that I am _diagnosed_ with the thing, I will try and make more use of note taking, since I'm made aware my memory isn't great.
I have ADHD too and for some reasons sometimes even an idea to write sth down is painful. But I still try and I think that's something that you can train yourself to do. But you really have to do that every day or even every hour.
Funny, but nah. Writing it down is a way to structure thoughts and get it out of your system. But I use a simple text editor (Sublime) for this and I write them in a braindump-kind-of-way.

There's really only one thing you gotta know about note-taking: you either optimize for fast writing or for fast information retrieval. Since I rarely read my notes, I optimize for fast dumping them.

All apps and organizational schemes like Zettelkasten try to optimize the information retrieval aspect, which imho, is probably not that important for many people.

> Writing it down is a way to structure thoughts and get it out of your system.

Why do you feel the need to "structure thoughts" and "get it out of your system"?

Asking as a way to point out that feeling the need to do it is not a forgone conclusion.

> Why do you feel the need to "structure thoughts"

Well, because the alternative is for your thoughts to be unstructured. Lots of people live their lives that way: reminiscing about that time they got so drunk or really told that guy off, repeating funny lines they heard on some TV series, rehearsing ethnic or religious stereotypes, complaining about the neighbors' loud music, trying to get laid, and heating up some hamburgers at dinnertime. Lots of people are content to be consumers and to repeat what they've heard. Then they die.

But it doesn't have to be that way. You can structure your thoughts. You can be a creator, not just a consumer, and to a significant extent you can direct your life to a goal rather than simply floating at random. Notetaking is helpful for doing that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30098854

> Why do you feel the need to "structure thoughts" and "get it out of your system"?

I give you a simple example. If you play Wordle and you stop to think about your next guess, you can make all the possible permutations in your brain. This is possible with the downside that you might start to think in loops and consider the same word-pattern over and over again.

Or you write them down and solve the next guess by doing all permutations on paper (or a text editor).

Note-taking is somewhat similar. Structuring thoughts for me means that I write them down to avoid looping around the same thing all the time. I get it out of my system, because my brain isn't stuck in the same loop. Note-taking helps to speed up the passive brain processing task in some cases. Not always. Not for everything.

> My take - note taking is a symtom of ADHD

It's not a symptom of ADHD. It's one of the coping strategies for people with ADHD who have problems memorising things.

(comment deleted)
If note taking is used to help with memory, it should be done under rules or supervision, in my opinion.

The usual way to track knowledge and tasks is within a project. You come to a road block, do research, overcome, and continue.

But many of those note taking posts talk about personal "wiki" projects and tracking _everything_. I suspect that with ADHD its hard to filter out the important things from background. And based on my observation wth these apps people start organizing and remembering this "background". When background noise is reduced the need for complex apps is no longer there - there are a lot fewer things left that are worth remembering. (exceptions apply, of course)

I think the parent's implication was that not taking is a coping strategy for ADHD, but it does not mean that note taking indicates ADHD. Meaning that you are probably right that ADHD patient should be supervised or guided in note taking, but that does not necessarily apply to other note takers.
>The usual way to track knowledge and tasks is within a project. You come to a road block, do research, overcome, and continue.

That might be your personal experience/bias speaking.

For many creative endeavours there's not a "single project" where you do research, finish, wrap up and that's it. You need to track lots of pieces of information across many projects, domains, and across time.

> If note taking is used to help with memory, it should be done under rules or supervision, in my opinion.

You're kind of implying that failing memory is unusual/exceptional and that it needs particular attention.

Here's the cold hard truth of memory: your memory isn't as good as you think it is. No one's memory is as good as they think it is. And nothing you remember comes back out of your memory quite the way it went in.

Writing good, complete notes that could be read by someone else (complete sentences) helps you design the prompts for your future recall of something complicated. Because one day you'll be that someone else.

When I write code, I try to write code and comments that a version of me that is ten years older and persistently two hours short of sleep will be able to cope with at 10pm. My tireder, older self. Because one day he'll have to read it, understand it, and change it.

I try to write notes the same way!

Absolutely "not necessarily". SWE requires an extensive amount of learning (if you're lucky :)).

Unless one has extraordinary mnemonic capabilities, note taking is a way to structure and store concepts.

Even if this wasn't the case, personal notes are still a more efficient/effective way than googling, for two reasons: 1. on the notes, one puts the processed version of a concept, so that it's safer/more stable/improved/cleaner/adapted etc. 2. personal notes follow the mind of who writes them, so the concepts are faster to find.

Are you implying that note-taking is an unhealthy obsession, or coping mechanism? Pretty much every famous and successful inventor, artist, writer, or leader, from Winston Churchill to Leonardo Da Vinci left behind a copious, almost obsessive amount of notes/diaries/sketches/lists.
>But wanting to "organize life", "track thoughts and ideas", "never forget what you learned", etc, are symptoms, not cures.

It's the inverse.

Note-taking might be a symptom of OCD or autism disorders (that can make people compulsively take notes or enjoying collecting information in itself), but they are cures (or, rather, coping strategies) for ADHD.

ADHD is not manifested as "tendency to take notes" for note-taking to be a symptom.

It's manifested as tendency to be disorganized, to have trouble tracking thoughts, forgetting, etc - which makes note-taking a way to manage symptoms.

It's looks like you fell for the "correlation equals causation" fallacy, not in a study, but in a simple real life observation that should have been trivial to see the right casual direction!

Note-taking is a really reliable route out of OCD rumination, actually.

My day can be ruined by positive and negative ruminations. Writing stuff down really helps me let go of them.

For me, note-taking is:

1) a symptom of being a freelancer with multiple clients who revisits projects sometimes a decade after doing them. It is the only way to proceed -- even if you were to assert that persistent "documentation" of a project is distinct from "notes" about it, those notes are still essential.

2) a route towards making that documentation; it's easier to assemble documentation from things you've noted than to start with a blank page.

3) a way to know, deeply, what it is I actually think about something. Not just what I think right now in that moment, but why. What facts I took into account; what facts I disregarded, why I disregarded them, and why I might need to revisit that next time.

I like note taking because it augments my thinking. Specifically, it helps me store knowledge for later and organize my thoughts when I'm thinking.

I think what makes it obsessive for me is that I always want to improve my thinking, even if it's a tiny increase. That's why I always check out other people's note taking methods and software, in the hopes of finding a little nugget of optimization.

As for my method, I use plain text and vim to store my notes. If I need to think deeply about a problem, I use a paper notebook and pencil. This is because that combination is good for visualizing a problem.

Dude, I just take notes so I can remember stuff. I imagine everyone else is like me and was born human with a human brain, and let's face it, that piece of soggy bacon just doesn't work worth a damn.

There really isn't anything more to this, people enjoy being productive and meaningful in their lives, and it is one of the fundamental drives of the human condition.