[–] sqqqqrly 4y ago ↗ I'd rather quit Niel Young.The answer to bad speech is better speech. [–] dragonwriter 4y ago ↗ > The answer to bad speech is better speech.The origin of that idea relies on the good speech winning out in convincing people to relay it; relaying everything without judgment and the signal is drowned in noise. [–] newsbinator 4y ago ↗ Nevertheless, whenever somebody who isn't a trusted person in my life says "you have to choose: me or them", I always choose them.
[–] dragonwriter 4y ago ↗ > The answer to bad speech is better speech.The origin of that idea relies on the good speech winning out in convincing people to relay it; relaying everything without judgment and the signal is drowned in noise. [–] newsbinator 4y ago ↗ Nevertheless, whenever somebody who isn't a trusted person in my life says "you have to choose: me or them", I always choose them.
[–] newsbinator 4y ago ↗ Nevertheless, whenever somebody who isn't a trusted person in my life says "you have to choose: me or them", I always choose them.
[–] sqqqqrly 4y ago ↗ I have chosen to cancel Niel Young. The solution to bad speech is better speech. [–] pozdnyshev90 4y ago ↗ brave
5 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 20.8 ms ] threadThe answer to bad speech is better speech.
The origin of that idea relies on the good speech winning out in convincing people to relay it; relaying everything without judgment and the signal is drowned in noise.