[–] 2Gkashmiri 4y ago ↗ 3: Syntax error: "(" unexpected??? [–] voakbasda 4y ago ↗ What provides ‘bash’ on your system? Other shells will choke on its array syntax. [–] 2Gkashmiri 4y ago ↗ nope. i use konsole and i have never installed anything other so it would be bash [–] parasense 4y ago ↗ Like, an ancient version of bash.Can you please try doing this:$ echo $BASH_VERSION [–] 2Gkashmiri 4y ago ↗ 5.0.17(1)-release [–] parasense 4y ago ↗ My dude, that's not ancient at all! You should be good, so that's perpelxing.You can try my improved version in the comments: https://gist.github.com/rudolfschmidt/b79b7864bac19cc7148edf...
[–] voakbasda 4y ago ↗ What provides ‘bash’ on your system? Other shells will choke on its array syntax. [–] 2Gkashmiri 4y ago ↗ nope. i use konsole and i have never installed anything other so it would be bash [–] parasense 4y ago ↗ Like, an ancient version of bash.Can you please try doing this:$ echo $BASH_VERSION [–] 2Gkashmiri 4y ago ↗ 5.0.17(1)-release [–] parasense 4y ago ↗ My dude, that's not ancient at all! You should be good, so that's perpelxing.You can try my improved version in the comments: https://gist.github.com/rudolfschmidt/b79b7864bac19cc7148edf...
[–] 2Gkashmiri 4y ago ↗ nope. i use konsole and i have never installed anything other so it would be bash [–] parasense 4y ago ↗ Like, an ancient version of bash.Can you please try doing this:$ echo $BASH_VERSION [–] 2Gkashmiri 4y ago ↗ 5.0.17(1)-release [–] parasense 4y ago ↗ My dude, that's not ancient at all! You should be good, so that's perpelxing.You can try my improved version in the comments: https://gist.github.com/rudolfschmidt/b79b7864bac19cc7148edf...
[–] parasense 4y ago ↗ Like, an ancient version of bash.Can you please try doing this:$ echo $BASH_VERSION [–] 2Gkashmiri 4y ago ↗ 5.0.17(1)-release [–] parasense 4y ago ↗ My dude, that's not ancient at all! You should be good, so that's perpelxing.You can try my improved version in the comments: https://gist.github.com/rudolfschmidt/b79b7864bac19cc7148edf...
[–] 2Gkashmiri 4y ago ↗ 5.0.17(1)-release [–] parasense 4y ago ↗ My dude, that's not ancient at all! You should be good, so that's perpelxing.You can try my improved version in the comments: https://gist.github.com/rudolfschmidt/b79b7864bac19cc7148edf...
[–] parasense 4y ago ↗ My dude, that's not ancient at all! You should be good, so that's perpelxing.You can try my improved version in the comments: https://gist.github.com/rudolfschmidt/b79b7864bac19cc7148edf...
[–] ComradePhil 4y ago ↗ I ran the script for a while and apparently these are available:bjc.de caw.de cqk.de ctf.de eqn.de fab.de hwj.de iwy.de myd.deI stopped it after that. [–] ZetaZero 4y ago ↗ Rats. ABC.DE taken [–] lomex2000 4y ago ↗ They look free but they aren’t I can’t register them with any provider even if some say they are free during the domain search.
[–] lomex2000 4y ago ↗ They look free but they aren’t I can’t register them with any provider even if some say they are free during the domain search.
[–] dim13 4y ago ↗ And that's the story behind xkcd.com -- one of very last available 4-letter domains in .com zone back then. [–] dogline 4y ago ↗ Are there still 5 letter .com domains?
[–] bruce343434 4y ago ↗ Bad script with lots of false positives. For .nl domains for instance, you must query it with whois and grep for "name.nl is free".Just because there are no DNS records doesn't mean the domain is free.
12 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 38.4 ms ] thread???
Can you please try doing this:
$ echo $BASH_VERSION
You can try my improved version in the comments: https://gist.github.com/rudolfschmidt/b79b7864bac19cc7148edf...
bjc.de caw.de cqk.de ctf.de eqn.de fab.de hwj.de iwy.de myd.de
I stopped it after that.
Just because there are no DNS records doesn't mean the domain is free.