Ask HN: Where do you find your sense of purpose working in the private sector?

82 points by greenpastures22 ↗ HN
After almost 20 years working in the public sector, I've come to the realization that my passion for public service no longer outweighs my many day-to-day frustrations. A sense of purpose is what kept me in government for so long, but the bureaucracy, the aversion to change, and the outdated technology have made loving my work more and more difficult. I've been contemplating moving into the private sector for a long time now--I'm just worried that I'll end up feeling lost in a world that is driven by profit. I recognize however that my view is that of an outsider. I've never worked in business, and in truth, I don't really know what drives people. I'm hoping the good folks of HN can provide some insight. Where do you find your sense of purpose working in the private sector?

124 comments

[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 166 ms ] thread
I'm sure you'll get a wide variety of answers here.

As a software engineer, I like solving complex technical problems and learning software, management, and people skills. It doesn't matter to me what I'm doing as long as it's ethical and I can grow.

> As a software engineer, I like solving complex technical problems and learning software, management, and people skills. It doesn't matter to me what I'm doing as long as it's ethical and I can grow.

Now I'm in completely the wrong forum to say this, as this place obviously favors one view, but can you say that building companies just for the purpose of profits is actually ethical?

often companies are the sole providers of needed products and services.

or increased efficiency which is important too. I work on software that makes factory and warehouse operations more power efficient, and that feels meaningful to me!

I don't understand why you think profit is a bad thing.

Ignoring broken markets like in the case of monopolies (and my company is a small one--definitely not a monopoly!), profit means you're creating value. People are willing to pay you more money than something costs to produce. That's a good thing for everyone involved. It creates jobs, customers are happy, and investors make money.

"Profit" isn't just a bunch of extra cash that gets buried in the ground. It goes back to shareholders (again, ignoring outliers like Apple which horde cash...) and gets reinvested in other profitable enterprises creating even more value.

By working on proprietary technology I (and many people) use daily, which I couldn't make myself, e.g. car infotainment, kernels and drivers. Pointing at something and saying "I partly made that". Being able to touch what you develop makes the rubber hit the road.
To be honest, a job is a job that pays the bills. Civilization is a huge resource optimization machine, and while there are pathologies, generally I believe in the market economys capability in guiding resource utilization. I.e. if someone pays for a job to be well done, I presume it is a job that's worth doing.

Mind you, for me it's obvious my employers software is useful as it is used in large construction project globally. Hence, for me I can point at buildings and say our work helped in achieving them.

I also to like to work with other people - there is very nice sense of achievement when a team manages to ship the next version to happy customers.

I work in the security industry. The products I work on help keep hundreds of thousands of people safer in an online world whose threat landscape is expanding daily. That sounds like a marketing sound bite, but it's absolutely true.
You might want to check out the nonprofit world. I've been in private and public sector IT and felt the same way you do. The public sector was frustrating. I couldn't get into the private sector work, nothing I did was worth it. But I've found a happy place at a non-profit. It's a small place and doesn't suffer from the govt drag. I believe we all share a common mission, and I like that mission. The people I work with are all into it. It helps that I really like the people I work with.
By making something useful! There's nothing wrong with charging an honest price for a useful service. That can be just as valuable as public service.
Further to this - most useful goods and services are made in the private sector. Food, clothing, housing. Pretty good stuff.

Very reasonable people wonder how anyone can spend time in the public sector. They don't seem to get much done there, they waste a lot of people's hard earned money. They can be viewed as at best a necessary evil, and at worst downright corrupt. I don't agree 100% with those notions, but they aren't crazy either.

To think about it, govt is supposed to be profitable while providing the services. Private is no different. You have to be better and cheaper than your competition.
Government is not supposed to be profitable. It is supposed to minimize cost of meeting needs that the voters agree should be provided by the government.

“Profit” in the public sector would indicate that too much tax money was collected, because there shouldn’t be a surplus at the end of a year. There shouldn’t be a deficit either, but that’s a different story.

Neither of these are correct, they're libertarian talking points. You can't really distangle the competing goals of different classes, but if you were to take democracy seriously, it is to do whatever the majority wants. Some problems with that when it conflicts with certain fundamental values, but the US mostly doesn't follow majority rule anyway as is documented in many studies.
The private sector varies pretty heavily. I think it's fair to say that some companies/industries have a much better "purpose" than others.

I work in online payments right now. It's no Stripe - we're a smaller shop. But ultimately it feels good to know that many small businesses and mom-n-pop shops depend on us for their livelihood.

On the flip-side, I have a friend who spent many years working for this weird ponzi scheme / multi-level-marketing shop (overseas) that spent their insane earnings funding really bad movies starring the founder's adult kids. I have to imagine that person would have a much harder time finding a sense of purpose than I do at my current employer.

The incentive in the private sector may be profit, but look at the progress and good for the world that the private sector has created over last 400 years. Public sector has aided in that too, but the explosion in innovation that has occurred since the advent of private enterprise is hyper exponential on the scale of human history.
My sense of purpose comes from two places :

A) the ability to innovate through R&D. Perhaps this is egotistical but it brings a lot of purpose to my work.

B) developing people’s careers and offering a fair opportunity for success.

Yes, perhaps these purposes are not quite as altruistic but I am passionate about such a job and great people I work with.

My sense of purpose comes from self improvement (learning new skills, improving skills I already know), it has very little to do with my work anymore. I believe it's dangerous to tie your self worth and purpose to your job. Working in the corporate/private sector will only drain you when you realize the company you work for treats you like a resource rather than a human being. So my advice is find purpose outside of your work, and use your work as a means to fund your needs/hobbies/interest, rather than your purpose for existing.
You can find companies/projects that while "driven by profit" still make good things, things that genuinely help or enrich peoples' life. You don't have to jump to the other extreme and work on harmful projects. Can also work for non-profit companies as well.

On a more personal level as a programmer there's always some exciting problem to solve, something that can be optimised. Also, being in the games industry I get to interact with a lot of artists which is something I've always looked for.

Find a company that helps others as part of its products. Its easy to hand wave and claim entire industries are filled with companies that are greedy but there are companies out there with a purpose/mission that aligns with something other than greed.

Or (tongue-in-cheek) find a large non-tech Fortune 500 company, you'll feel like you're working for the government since they move slow and have lots of bureaucracy.

Finding your sense of purpose in your work is bad, IMO, unless you own the company or have a similar position. I don't want my self-worth to be tied to an employer or market that can get rid of me any time. It's just a job. At best, I work in places that aren't morally against my values.
I completely agree, find your purpose outside of work. This can take many forms from spiritual to practical but I firmly believe you need to find a reason for existing outside of your job.
Probably the best answer here. Need to work on distancing myself from work psychologically
I was a teacher for almost a decade. I had a fulfilled sense of purpose and was miserable doing it. I was also paid poorly.

For the past 6 years I've been doing data work for government contractors. I feel no sense of purpose with the work I produce and I'm happier in my life than at most any point.

My partner works for a pharmaceutical lab and does world changing work. They work on cancer drugs, COVID vaccines, etc. It's a meat grinder and she and all her coworkers hate it.

The first question you need to answer for yourself is what is your purpose in life, what makes you happy, how do you want to spend the days you have. Then ask yourself how to structure your work and life to serve those goals. For me that means not having to care about work, and I'm much happier with my life now that I don't.

by definition work/material world does not bring fullfilment !!!
Profit doesn’t exist if you’re not fulfilling customer needs.* Find a need that people pay for that to find fulfilling and go support it.

*In theory. In practice, there are all types of companies that exist due to regulatory quirks / that customers are forced to interact with. If you flip it, technically people are forced to work with the government whether they like it or not and regardless of the quality of service. In the private sector they have a choice of using your company. At the extreme, if it is bad enough, they can start their own.

Unfortunately, people "need" a lot of drugs, cigarettes, booze, mindless and/or harmful distractions and entertainment etc. A small fraction of our economy is serving people's real needs, while the rest is serving wants, which are quite often not good for the people who want them.
>At the extreme, if it is bad enough, they can start their own.

That is not a realistic proposition, either. People are as forced to use private services as they are forced to use government ones. There might be a competitor, but even that does not necessarily provide cheaper or better service or products.

Many companies manage to make a profit while doing good in the world. "Doing good" can also include providing a product or service that people are happy to pay for.

And I've also found my most satisfying jobs are where I can bring up junior people, and shape their careers. Be the manager you wish you had and bring up your reports to be managers like that too, and to pass it on themselves - the good you do will keep on happening after you've left the scene, possibly for ever.

If the good people don't step up to manage, the bad ones will. Increasing the world's share of good ones is a worthy goal.

You don’t. More than twenty years in and I’m certain that “passion” and “purpose” are gilded carrots used to misinform and sway the naive when used by capitalists. You won’t find purpose in a capitalist society.

You’re more likely to find a decent trade of your time, skills, and social connections for money, stock options, bonuses, and a benefits plan.

Treat it like a mercenary and you’ll do okay.

Now that isn’t to say that you, an individual, cannot find you own passions and purpose. These come from within and you won’t find them validated in a capital market. Know what they are and try to align your opportunities with them when you can and you can go pretty far.

As the saying goes, work to live vs live to work
Beware of faraway fields, If you find bureaucracy and legacy tech difficult to deal with stay away from any regulated industries like pharma or finance. E.g. try writing a report why your team widened a column on a controlled excel sheet that could no longer show all the values without raising both types of change control, apparently one is not enough then you have to write the report and go to a meeting to explain it.
Green tech / energy efficiency is a good part of private sector to work in in terms of purpose. Or maybe you could find a different part of the government? Maybe other parts are less beaurocratic, more modern tech, or a least less resistant to change? Having worked in both public and private sector, I far prefer the public sector. But you have to be in a decent bit of it of course....
> Where do you find your sense of purpose working in the private sector?

I work on improving the treatment of cancer through the application of deep learning. I am employed by a FAANG and work very closely with several leading nonprofit academic medical centres. Our primary driver is real-world patient impact (rather than, say, revenue or just academic publications).

Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of downsides to working in this space but lacking a sense of purpose isn't one of them (for me).

Ultimately, the company you are employed by is employing you to improve their bottom-line, as all of FAANG are for-profit companies. If your branch suddenly starts eating away profits (research proving something your company does is bad for example) or being too costly without improving the profits, there is a real risk they'll cut your branch/team. Is that not a fear for you? I'd like to understand the reasoning how it doesn't concern you.
Profit just means your produce more things of value than you consume. It is the first part of true sustainability. If it hurts the bigger org it might be cut but if it’s sustainable it wont need the support of the bigger org.
This is off-topic a bit but something on my mind lately is this: there are known mechanisms for making a corporation accountable to something other than management profit, so why don't places use them? B incorporation, employee cooperative profit sharing arrangements, and so forth.

Maybe I'm overly cynical at this point in my life, or maybe it's just because I'm just unfamiliar with this stuff, but it seems like if places really wanted to prioritize something other than raw profit they'd do so. All this other stuff seems like rationalizations to me sometimes.

I don't want to come across the wrong way; I think there's a lot of good that can come from focusing on the bottom line. I just sometimes feel like greater diversity of organizational mechanisms would make the world a better place.

> Is that not a fear for you?

Would I be disappointed if my project got cancelled? Yes. I think it would be a missed opportunity for my employer to make a meaningful change in an important space.

Am I fearful of it being cancelled? Absolutely not. I'll just find a new gig and move on with my life.

Last time my (much more commercially-focussed) project got canned, I had four very exciting offers lined up within a few weeks. All of those internal and within my very tight geographic constraints (couple of cities in Europe). I didn't even bother interviewing with other companies as I felt no need.

In the end, the cancellation turned out to be a great thing for me personally as it forced me to move. In the process of that move I found the current -- much more fulfilling -- gig.

Much as I love it, at the end of the day it's just a job. There are plenty of other opportunities out there if I ever need to find a new one.

Honestly? It's little more than the better pay for me. I'm generally a conscious person with politics based on empathy and equality, and I have the same thoughts you have, but I have never worked in the public sector due to low salaries compared to the private sector.

I don't lie to myself, either. What I create is not making the world a better place by much at all. I'm making industry software that helps create products. Nothing more, nothing less. I steer clear of miltech or creating software for police or secret services, but apart from that, all it does is create value for some shareholders somewhere while pumping out products that are probably unnecessary and wasteful.

It's an interior conflict that does not go away, and I won't say I have resolved any of it for me. I know that I'm not contributing to saving the world, and it sucks. But I'm also not really in a position to change that. Furthermore, I'm not in a field where governments usually look for talent, and I do enjoy the freedom of creating my own systems with the architecture I prefer and not being constrained by the tight requirements of gov systems.

The little purpose I do find is in creating quality software that kind of makes stuff more efficient and by extension, helps progress towards a more sustainable future with less manual labor. But, in a way, that's what everyone on Earth does, so it's not much.

In my experience, the public VS private debate is a false dichotomy. Here is why :

- What influences your day to day experience is the size of the firm for which you work. Big gov and big corp have much more in common than a startup and a small charity group. Think about how the abundance of ressources, staff, speed of change, stability and reputation management will affect your job. Big firms often have two employees for the same role (in case one of them goes away), while small firm often have two roles for the same employee.

- For most people, ''vision'' is a buzzword. By construction, it should come out of your imagination ; it is a desired change on actual reality. This is why vision jobs are less secure than 'pragmatic' jobs. Sense of purpose is an experience where your action are aligned with your vision ; you understand how your work builds the vision. It gives fire in the belly!

- Money being a lag indicator of the state of affairs, profit or security seeking people (which are the same thing with a different name) often end up in big organizations. People with a strong sense of purpose would rather want to join a small group with an non-established business model which aims to change the world.

In other words :

Profit & Security => Established & working business model => big organization => hierarchy with redundance => low sense of purpose

Financial risk => Unproven business model => small firm => too much jobs for few people => high sense of purpose.