Launch HN: Anja Health (YC W22) – Freezing stem cells at birth for future health (anjahealth.com)

148 points by pkukp9 ↗ HN
Hi HN, My name is Kathryn Cross, and I’m the founder of Anja Health (https://anjahealth.com/). We help pregnant parents freeze their baby’s umbilical cord and placenta at birth, in order to save stem cells in case they're needed in the future.

“Anja” refers to my brother Andrew. When I was 3 and Andrew was 1, he was in a near-drowning accident that gave him cerebral palsy. My parents immediately began searching for a way to help his condition, and the most promising thing they could find was umbilical cord blood stem cells, which have been shown to improve motor and social skills in children with cerebral palsy. However, we couldn't find a match because matching happens via ethnicity (at a high level), and my brother and I are mixed race. So, lack of access to cord blood stem cells is a pain point that my family knows deeply, and I felt it the most this past year when my brother passed away. I knew I had to solve this issue for others.

I want everyone to have access to their own umbilical cord blood stem cells, especially since more powerful uses will likely be found for these cells in the future. Also, since banked cells can be used by relatives (the closer the better), this process is really for families, not just individuals. Donated cord blood can save a life, but chances of survival have proven to be much higher with stem cells that you are genetically matched to.

Cord blood stem cells have been used for heart disease, liver disease, cancer, IBS, type 1 diabetes, neurological disease, and more. Selma Blair, for instance, has even used them to help her multiple sclerosis. They’ve also been used to help children with neuroblastomas, lymphomas, and leukemia specifically.

We are one of the few cord blood banks with an advanced lab—advanced enough to offer placenta banking and manual stem cell processing, which maximizes stem cell count and collection at birth.

How it works: we ship our stem cell collection kit to you. You keep it in your bag to bring to the birth, and a nurse or midwife uses the kit (a cord blood bag with a needle and 2 containers for the placenta and cord) to collect. This takes 5-10 minutes. (Delayed cord clamping and cord blood banking are compatible—you can delay cord clamping and bank the rest.) You call us a few hours after birth, and a courier will meet you anywhere in the US within 12 hours to bring the kit to our lab in New Jersey, where it's cryopreserved at around -190 degrees C in vapor nitrogen. You will then have stem cells for injury, disease, and other treatment purposes that you can always access upon request.

We are more user friendly and more technically inclined than other solutions. Lower costs and tech operations allow us to be the most affordable option. For as low as $35/month, parents can store their baby’s once-in-a-lifetime stem cells (our price plans are here: https://anjahealth.com/shop/#pricing). While we realize that our price points are still an investment, we are currently the most affordable and we think it’s worth it because it could potentially save a life. Our hope is to bring costs down over time, so more people can access this potentially life-saving process.

Cord blood banking is a surprisingly little-known option for birth, so a big part of our effort is in education and outreach. Most umbilical cords and placentas are thrown away. (Side note: plancentas are so valuable that physicians - especially in Europe - sometimes prefer to take them for themselves to sell to cosmetics research for ~$50k.)

We have a medical advisory board with 2 OB/GYNs (Dr. Jay Chang and Dr. Allison Rodgers). Our lab has over 40 years of experience in the blood processing space, and our lab director is a former AABB accreditor. Our lab is AABB accredited and FDA approved.

To conclude, if you had a baby recently and banked cord blood, I’d...

159 comments

[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 248 ms ] thread
> However, we couldn't find a match because matching happens via ethnicity (at a high level), and my brother and I are mixed race. So, lack of access to cord blood stem cells is a pain point that my family knows deeply,

I am a mix of White, Chinese, and Caribbean Black, so this alarms me, as I seriously doubt that there are many people with my particular makeup out there.

A long way from having kids, but at least for me, this made the value proposition for this a lot more relevant for if/when I do.

For sure! So glad you will!
(comment deleted)
For someone who hasn’t encountered this before and is expecting their first child in a couple months — how common is this in practice today?
For those who can afford it, it’s somewhat common. I did this for our son. Just another insurance policy to give your kid every chance
Congrats!! We pride ourselves on our customer service, so if you have any questions, definitely feel free to reach out to us.

In the US, only about 2% of parents bank cord blood due to a huge awareness issue (that 2% is concentrated in wealthy, urban areas - think Greenwich, Beverly Hills, Upper East Side). In Singapore, however, rates can be as high as 30%, and in certain areas of China it's at around 10%. The greatest barrier in the US is for sure awareness and secondarily pricing, so we're working on trying to lower costs. When you first read this post, what was your first reaction? What are you most curious about?

We found it was quite common, and for the prices we paid (which are significantly cheaper than this startup - YMMV) it was a no brainer.

I was not convinced on the science today, but when it is cheap I figured that it is worth a punt on the assumption that science will improve in the next two decades. If not you've only spent about as much as a new Mac book Pro (from most providers) so worth the gamble.

My kids' (16 & 11) cord-blood and tissue were frozen with a similar service at birth.

I saw your pricing and was a bit shocked that it's 3x what I pay on an annualized basis. However, my rate seems to have been grandfathered in - the other service has also updated their pricing to match yours.

1. Is there anything particularly different from the competition that you offer?

2. Is there a reason for such a steep price increase? (While I understand the monthly payments, a 3x multiple over 16 years seems pretty steep. You, like the service we used, offer ~20 year storage commitment. Should I be preparing to pay 10 times as much if we want to preserve it for the 20-40 year age span?)

It's good you did that. We passed on doing it for both our daughters (11 & 7). In hindsight after my younger daughter was diagnosed with Leukemia the decision not to do it wasn't really good. She's in remission and fine now. But you never know when treatments would be facilitated by the stem cells.
I'm so sorry about your daughter. Did she ever find a cord blood donor?
The regular chemo treatment was good enough. For childhook Leukemia the remission rates are almost approaching a cure. So in a sense we were lucky.
I've heard of other services that will extract and then culture stem cells from milk teeth or even from bone marrow. Have halfway considered it, but making a special trip and expense to get bone marrow extracted on the off chance it'll be useful in the future is a bit tough to convince oneself to do...
Nothing to add except I'm glad your daughter is doing better!
Saving your youngest daughter's stemcells might not have done much, since they likely were "contaminated" with very early stages disease already. Your oldest daughter's stemcells would have had a 1/4 chance of being compatible, but maybe that was what you meant. The chances of needing stem cell treatment for your children are not that high though, so I don't think you should feel bad about not doing it. I'm glad it worked out in the end, I wish her a good life!
Hi! 1. Yes - we are more affordable, offer placenta banking (which few other banks offer), and we process stem cells manually (by hand) as opposed to automatically, which recovers up to 25% more stem cells than other automated approaches 2. It depends on the agreement you signed - some agreements have disclosures about inflation impacting pricing, so perhaps. We structured our pricing around expedited shipping to our lab with biological goods & cryopreservation
What part of the world do you live in? Do you know what treatments they can be used for, if any are even approved and they can even be utilized?

In Canada from my understanding is people can store these tissue products but they're not approved for any use yet.

Congrats on your launch!

How is Anja Health different from other established US providers such as Cord Blood Registry, Via-Cord, or Cryo-Cell?

Also, if our family already has a sample frozen at one of these other facilities, and assuming there's a compelling reason to switch, do you have a tissue sample transfer mechanism/protocol?

>>If you didn’t, what prevented you from doing so?

Didn't for our first child because we weren't aware (education/awareness issue), but we did it for the second child. It feels like a tail risk hedge, and literally YOLO-type analysis is what motivates us to continue paying for the sample to stay frozen.

Thank you! We're different in a few ways: 1. More affordable pricing. 2. We manually process stem cells vs. automatically processing them (can yield up to 25% more stem cells this way) 3. We offer placenta banking 4. We have a brand and community behind us! I've built out a following on TikTok of about 80k thus far (has grown by about 25k since the batch began, so growing quickly), and I think many resonate with our brand and especially my personal story, which I talk about often

So glad you did it for your second! Siblings can be a 75% match, so that's awesome. Love the term YOLO-type analysis haha

Perhaps I'm in the minority here, but I don't necessarily feel that having a large tiktok following is a plus for a medical service provider.
Distribution is distribution :)
I don't doubt that it's a good way for you to quickly get customers. I just would never use it myself.

But it's getting pretty clear that the only innovation here is to target lower income families than your competitors, by using platforms like tiktok and charging a low upfront fee (but higher monthly fee).

Yup! Lower income families like us because we are accessible. Higher income families & providers as well like us because of our personalization and onboarding
Well, you're much more expensive in the long run. But that's pretty typical for companies targeting poorer people. So you're essentially a very expensive financing solution.
Low income families themselves have told us they’re so happy they finally found an affordable solution. So I’d beg to differ (qualifying low income as <75k household income. They self reported)
I have looked around, Anja is the cheapest. Other company has a big upfront cost that is around $1000 or more, not Anja. In the long run, it is also cheaper.
I can no longer reply to your last comment @Grustaf for some reason haha but I'm guessing you're still reading these. We are currently the most affordable in the industry. When you add up cord blood alone amongst all cord blood banks and make the plans specific to 20 years, ours comes out to be ~3000. Others come out to be 3500+. Can send you some data on this if you'd like to correspond via email
Yeah you have to wait a minute or something until you reply.

No need, I believe you. It's just that it seemed others here pay less than that.

But it's a bit confusing that you only pay for the first 8 years. That makes it look more expensive than it is. Why not lower the monthly fee to $20 but keep it for the full 20 years?

Didnt want parents to have to worry for an extended period.
It seems to me that lowering the monthly cost is precisely what they'd prefer. 8 years later both parents are probably back to working full-time, and with promotions etc they will have better economies.

Why would a young not so well off family prefer to pay 35 dollars a month for eight years, to paying say 20 for 20 years?

I'm really confused by this because it seems that it would benefit both your customers, and you, since you could charge more overall while imposing a smaller burden. Plus it would sound cheaper.

(comment deleted)
Especially when you're considering something very long term. What does TikTok branding mean in 20-year timespan?
is there any science backing this? case studies of actual people actually benefiting from it?
Definitely! Many. We have an open source cord blood banking library if you'd like to take a look (https://anjahealth.notion.site/Cord-Blood-Banking-Library-60...)

Highlights include real cases of cord blood being used to reverse type 1 diabetes (https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240160#1), significantly improve symptoms of Chron's (https://www.dvcstem.com/post/stem-cell-crohns-case-study), promote CAR-T cell therapy (https://www.cancertherapyadvisor.com/home/cancer-topics/hema...), treating neuroblastoma on a 7-year-old (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1357627/), and more!

The cost at established banks was 180 - 300 per year after the initial deposit. Some also separated the stem cells into multiple packets on deposit so you don’t use all of it on one incident, unless you need to. How are you guys better?
The multiple packets on deposit is actually a marketing tactic haha. There's a lot of chatter about using 2 vs. 5 compartments (our lab uses 5), but in reality, they are 2 large compartments or 5 small ones and people will generally use as many stem cells as they can if an emergency health situation comes about.

We're different because 1. pricing - we offer monthly payments (we have offered annual upon request). When you add up all banks' costs to cover 20 years, we are the cheapest option. 2. We process stem cells manually (by hand), which can yield up to 25% more stem cells than if they are processed with a machine/automatically. Our brand is built around evidence-based personalization. 3. We offer placenta banking, which requires a more advanced lab that we have access to. 4. We have a brand and community behind us. Many parents tell us that they choose us over other banks because we have such personal customer service where everyone feels educated walking into the process of banking and they feel comfort walking out of the process of banking.

But you are MORE expensive than all the examples cited. How is that an advantage?

As to brand, how does that help?

What kind of personalisation do you offer?

We are LESS expensive than current other options - I believe the other options mentioned are price points offered many years ago haha. We are $35/mo for 8 years to cover 20 years of storage. That is our cheapest - check our a price breakdown at anjahealth.com/shop/#pricing

As a brand, it helps because people of color can be most affected by being unable to find a stem cell match. And people of color - on average - have lower income in the US, so having lower prices makes us more accessible.

Personalization happens technically with manual processing. It also happens emotionally because we cater to every single customer to make sure that they feel supported regardless of what their birth plan/unforeseen circumstances are

This seems very expensive to me. We are paying approx £8/11USD per month for umbilical cord, blood and placenta. This pricing was from last year.
Yeah I googled it quickly and that gives me prices around 100 a year. Random example from NBC News below. Perhaps Anja's initial costs are lower?

"Private cord blood banking can be expensive. Depending on the bank, current promotions and whether you're storing cord blood, cord tissue or both, initial processing fees can run from roughly $500 to $2,500, with annual storage fees of $100 to $300 each year thereafter." https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/cord-blood-banking...

Right - so in total for 20 years of storage for instance, (100-300)20 + (500-2500 down payment) comes out to more than our current prices which are (35-85) 8 for 20 years of storage as payments go over the course of 8 years to cover 20 years of storage.

I can guarantee we are the most affordable in the industry at this moment.

You having a strong brand helps people of color? Now you completely lost me. What do you mean?

So personalisation doesn't mean that the harvesting or storing is personalised? It just means you are emotionally supportive? Aren't your competitors supportive?

Re supportive. Not necessarily. Time and time again I hear stories along the lines of "I had to hand over my credit card in the middle of labor because I couldn't pay online and didn't know when I should pay" or "their supposed sales reps didn't have a lot of knowledge when I asked them questions specific to my birth plan."

Relevant to people of color because people like me - who are mixed race - will have a harder time finding a donor if they ever need stem cells. So banking their own ensures access

Do you have an alternate investment in this space or something? You've commented like 10 times with low quality content.

To spell this one out: Branding resonates with different groups of people. If the only brands that are in this space are ones that speak to non-people of color, by definition, the people of color wont see it, and by consequence, they wont have access to the treatments.

This applies to all things. Replace "people of color" with whatever you want. It's why there are "investment app for Gen Z" because the Merrill-Lynch doesn't reach anyone under 50. This is not rocket science, dude.

She didn't say anything about targeting, or not excluding, people of colour in their marketing. She just said having a brand is beneficial for them, and that confused me. Perhaps she said somewhere that they are targeting that group, if so I missed that.

I definitely don't have any investments in this space, I find it distasteful.

Appreciate the reply. Personally, I would rather hear your thoughts on why it's distasteful, seems like valuable discussion material. I got that impression from the comments and don't really know enough about the space to have an opinion. If you did, I missed it and I'm sorry.
tbh too many comments here are 'excited' about a business that is rather commonplace everywhere around the world, and is considered ethically ~dubious, since there are few cases where these cells are being used. Plus in past few years there were major advances in reprogramming live cells to back to various stages , and it seems that this is the future (partly the reason why investors invest in anti aging startups).
Agreed. As someone who has actually considered these services there are significant downsides not being presented here- not the least of which is the small number of actual use cases at the moment, especially for your own blood (which may demonstrate the same illness you’re trying to cure). I would have expected a bit more inquisitiveness from the audience here.

It just goes to show that being knowledgeable about technology doesn’t mean that you don’t have other significant blind spots.

My wife and I had our first child last October, and we wanted to collect the cord blood to donate, but the hospital said they didn't do cord blood collection. I know you can't speak for our specific hospital, but would that be a problem for other customers? Hospitals preventing nurses from collecting blood because of safety or liability concerns?
Donations are pretty heavily concentrated in New York City and they have a hard time collecting from other areas.

As for cord blood banking, anyone who can get a kit (which should be everyone because we ship nationally) should be able to bank, but in the rare cases that doctors push back, you can request that they put in your medical record that they are refusing, and usually they will reconsider because - inversely -they don't want to take on the liability of not banking haha

Congratulations on the launch! Would love to know (1) what’s the science like supporting this and (2) as a startup how do you guarantee the stems cells will still be around in 10/50 years?
We have an open source cord blood banking library if you'd like to take a look (https://anjahealth.notion.site/Cord-Blood-Banking-Library-60...) Highlights include real cases of cord blood being used to reverse type 1 diabetes (https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240160#1), significantly improve symptoms of Chron's (https://www.dvcstem.com/post/stem-cell-crohns-case-study), promote CAR-T cell therapy (https://www.cancertherapyadvisor.com/home/cancer-topics/hema...), treating neuroblastoma on a 7-year-old (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1357627/), and more!

Most notably, I like to point out that banking over donating is what we advocate for because using a donor's hematopoietic stem cells risks rejection and even fatality, so using a genetically related (or your own) stem cells increases your chances of survival (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejm199708073370602)

As a startup, we have a legal obligation to ensure that the CRM is handed off in case anything happens to the company. Our lab has been around for over 40 years processing different kinds of blood products, so they are definitely not going anywhere (and the blood products our clients stored wouldn't either), and they would simply communicate with a new CRM.

We're expecting our second here in a few months, and from my research it's really expensive and most folks would be better off donating. I feel like banks feed too much off of peoples fears instead of the better good. What are the odds of someone needing their own cord blood vs. it being a publicly accessible thing? It feels like donating blood to a bank to store it for myself in case I ever need it.

Again, it's an exciting field with a lot of really good outcomes, but it kind of plays into the whole, "what if something happens to your kid fear" to sell it to people, instead of thinking about all the other kids that you could be saving.

Congrats!! Donating can definitely be positive, but I think in a perfect world everyone has access to their own stem cells. Chances of survival are higher if you use a genetically related donor for a stem cell treatment. Beyond that, I'm a firm believer in the fact that if someone has access to these stem cells, they will use it at some point in life. Even if someone spends their whole life being healthy, they could be used for dementia/whatever old age brings. In the US, this is not quite as popular, but in other countries, people use stem cells in the same way they use botox - for anti-aging purposes. It could potentially be used for that down the line too.

Plus, standards for donations are very high. Some donations are rejected, so if you try to donate and it's rejected, then nobody wins :(

As for the fear mongering-related marketing, we do our very best to stay away from that, but truthfully it's a necessary thought when it comes to positioning a preventative care product.

Standards for donations meaning volume, certain history of disease, etc.
Congrats on the launch!

I have considered this in the past, but had a some questions on the investment (and typically high recurring cost):

1. How many years will cord blood usable when frozen?

2. Do you think ongoing research like the way Harvard researchers found ways to reprogram skin cells to stem cells [1], if eventually commercialized, would be a headwind for your business?

[1] https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2015/10/converting-sk...

1. They don't expire - there is not any evidence of detrimental deterioration 2. No - it's a different type of stem cell. The stem cells from cord blood are much more stable. Others have a risk of being carcinogenic even! ie embryonic stem cells
Interesting. What services to you provide to help manage and analyze material from multiple siblings, and do or will you take any special continuity measures?
We process them all separately! We do this for twins as well.
Isn’t it a bit strange to market a brand new startup as the “reliable” alternative?
It's not marketed as "reliable" moreso "accessible." haha although I would say that we are reliable as well. If anything ever happens, we have a legal obligation to shift CRM. It's as if a storage unit were to shut down and had other people's items in it. We have a legal responsibility to make sure that it's managed safely and accordingly
The second sentence on your website is "Finding a reliable place to bank your umbilical cord, cord blood, and placenta stem cells is hard".

By the way, the first sentence is "Get your personalized cord blood plan in minutes." but it seems from the other thread that there is no personalisation, every plan is the same?

Haha you're doing your research! Yes, in that sense we are reliable for the reasons I mentioned. There is personalization according to different birth plans. At its core, cryopreservation is the same, but we cater to different scenarios whether its a doula, midwife, nurse etc. being involved and whether they bank cord blood, cord tissue, placenta. Whether they do a home v hospital birth. Whether they want to do delayed cord clamping or not. Whether they are encapsulating their placenta or want to bank. Whether they are doing a lotus birth or not.
My understanding is that stem cells are special because they have the potential to turn into any type of specialized cell the body needs, whereas regular cells have already turned into specialized cell types and there's no un-frying the egg, as it were.

Has there been any research on producing stem cells from specialized cells? Or is there something fundamentally impossible about this, akin to producing the original content given only a hash value?

I haven’t kept up with the latest research, but the term for what you’re asking about is “induced pluripotent stem cells”.
> Has there been any research on producing stem cells from specialized cells?

Unsurprisingly, lots.

People have been researching this for a long time, with some famous success stories, eg.

https://dolly.roslin.ed.ac.uk/facts/the-life-of-dolly

For some extra context, Dolly was not made using the iPSC approach (reversing differentiation from adult cells). Dolly was cloned using a process called Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer, where the nucleus of an adult cell is placed inside an embryo, replacing the embryo's nucleus. The embryo then develops using the DNA of the individual that donated the nucleus.

The article kind of alludes poorly to this, but somatic cell nuclear transfer (developed by John Durdon) was a huge milestone in the field that eventually led to Yamanaka's discovery of the pluripotency factors, for which they both won the Nobel prize in 2012.

That's some excellent context, thank you.

I recall when Dolly was in the news, but only understood the broad strokes of the process. I did scan through that page for 'stem', and found a reference to future research, and noted the replication from an 'adult cell' (which I'd assume analogous to differentiated cell).

I'd guess the transfer process is why she arrived with shorter telomeres at birth?

> 'adult cell' (which I'd assume analogous to differentiated cell)

That's correct.

> I'd guess the transfer process is why she arrived with shorter telomeres at birth?

Also spot on. The donor somatic cell likely had shortened telomeres, resulting in shorter length in the embryo. It's kind of an interesting research question, because telomere length gets "restored" for germ cells (otherwise every time an organism produced sperm/eggs the telomeres would shorten), and these types of experiments demonstrate that there is a limit to that restorative process.

There has been a significant amount of work in this area. One of the most notable breakthroughs was from Shinya Yamanaka (and his lab) in 2006 & onward where they defined a core set of factors that can be expressed in adult cells to convert them back to embryonic stem cell-like states [1,2]. These cells are commonly referred to as induced pluripotent stem cells (abbreviated as iPSC's if you want to google them). There are a bunch of folks working on potential applications of the technology, but as you might imagine, it will take a lot of work the demonstrate safety & efficacy.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinya_Yamanaka [2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16904174/

Those types of stem cells can be extremely unstable and carcinogenic even, so yes, the ones that we collect are specialized specifically for either blood or tissue regeneration which is why they are more stable and not inclined to be carcinogenic.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41587-022-00002-4

Even though nobody is quite sure how it works, it's possible to reverse the epigenetics of a cell back to its original differentiated state and even back to stem cell form not entirely unlike rolling back git commits.

Congrats on your launch!

We had our baby two weeks ago (a mixed race kid as well) -- luckily we managed to find a service here in Australia and get his cord blood stored at the last minute. I didn't know this is a thing and could be vital for my kid's future health. My in-laws work in the medical industry and they were the ones who suggested us to do it. I was curious why isn't this suggested or recommended by OB/GYNs during pregnancy? Are there still any medical restrictions for using of cord blood?

Also, is 20 years the maximum effective storage period for it? Is it possible to transfer it between countries in case we decide to migrate in the future?

Recently spoke with a OB who said that he didn't like to mention it in the past because he felt slimy knowing that companies were hiking up their prices (since demand can be inelastic for baby health related products). He recently signed with us as an advisor because he knew we were well-intentioned and properly building an onboarding flow & company made for parents and for them only.

No evidence to show that extensive storage will damage the product! Potentially re: transfer, although it would depend on who is transferring & how

This seems very expensive to me.

We got something similar from a private company here in London - umbilical cord, blood, placenta - and the storage fee is £100 per year.l (there was an initial "set up" fee of approx £2,000 too). 85USD a month for storage seems like a lot for the same thing.

We figured that we'd spend perhaps £3,800 all-in to "insure" our kid until they're an adult which seemed like a great deal. 18k USD just for storage seems like less of a clear-cut value proposition.

Hi! How long are you paying that? Is it for life?

Our's is $35, 65, or 85/mo for 8 years to cover 20 years of storage. So it's nowhere near 18k

The pricing page says 85USD/month so I multiplied 85 x 12 x 18 for 18 years storage - I.e. 18,360.

We are paying £100 a year for as long as we want to keep it.

I guess it's like data backups: you don't actually know if you have a good deal until you need to retrieve and use it.
(comment deleted)
we send parents a stem cell certificate 1 month after birth. so you'd actually know that it's a good deal pretty immediately
If someone else is offering the same service cheaper, then you know it's not a good deal.
For sure. We're 8 years * 85/mo for payments * 12 months per year for 20 years of storage. So much less than 18k
> To conclude, if you had a baby recently and banked cord blood, I’d be curious to know what your experiences were. If you didn’t, what prevented you from doing so?

I had no idea this was a thing when my son was born. I trusted the doctors and staff of my medical HMO (Kaiser) to tell us what steps to take at each point in the process.

Ah I see - we'd love to help out next time!
Parent of three kids in Ontario. We definitely looked into this when our first was born 10 years ago, but the costs were way out of reach as something so speculative for a young couple just starting out and needing to choose our battles as far as finances.

I don't think donation was ever raised as a possibility; given that we never signed a consent for that, I assume it was all just disposed of.

For the most part, it is disposed of unfortunately :( there's super limited awareness on cord blood banking in the US
This is something that exists in Poland from at least 2017. I've done it for 2 of my children. Setup cost 700usd (based on package), yearly 200 usd - https://www.pbkm.pl/
Amazing! So glad you did
It existed at least in 2006 in Serbia, and probably few years before that. Operated by Swiss CryoSave company. It was upfront lifetime payment, something around 2000EUR. Although this price was more affordable than cumulative monthly payments, there was a scandal with that company. I think they bankrupted, but some Polish cryo bank took the bio material. So maybe upfront payment is not that sustainable (who would have thought?).

Btw. we deposited stem cells for our second child born in 2010, and when this scandal happened I tried not to think too much about it and just be grateful that we don't need that material. It should be still safe in that other bank though.

How do you compare to Cellino?

Cellino is looking to automate the process we use to create human cells, most specifically, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). IPSCs are made from other cell types, like blood cells, then transformed back into stem cells, which can eventually differentiate into many different cell types.

Those stem cells are more unstable than the ones we collect & can be carcinogenic
Is this business viable anymore? Don't we have the Yamanaka factors to reprogram any kind of cells to various levels of undifferentiation? Sounds like an investment with guaranteed zero return at some point in the near future.

Also as ohter say there are public banks for these in many european countries and the cost is ~ $1000 (but they are not available for everyone). There is also a perception that these companies are selling a service that won't be needed - just feeding off the hopes/fears of young parents.

It's an investment with tremendous return - I personally know the return first hand. If my brother had access to these stem cells, his motor skills could've been improved, which could've led him to more easily be able to do things like cough when he had pneumonia (which ultimately led to the downfall of his health). Reprogramming into other cells can create an extremely unstable cell and a carcinogenic environment

Survival rates from stem cell treatments are also much higher if the stem cells come from a genetically related sample - the best is your own. Beyond that, many may not find a match if you're a person of color or mixed race. This is also a pain point my family personally faced

That was decades ago though. AFAIK nowadays all countries operate large banks - the UK has a big one. It s likely that a donor CAN be found through such banks. Besides, this kind of commercial approach is not systematic and doesnt guarantee diversity of samples in any way -- in fact people from economically disadvantaged genetic backgrounds will have less access to it. Diversity is somethign that public bases do take into account.
Why do you think they'd have less access? They have greater access because they will 100% find a donor - themselves. It guarantees access to a sample regardless of genetic background
As I understand it many of the common potential use cases only work if you have a donor who isn’t yourself. Because if you have a genetic disease that disease will be present in your stem cells. The most common example I’ve heard is of storing stem cells to help a potential future sibling, not the baby directly. Or am I mistaken?
It has been used for the baby themselves & siblings :)

Some cases where babies use them themselves: https://www.nature.com/articles/bmt2012146

https://pediatrics.duke.edu/news/umbilical-cord-blood-improv...

I understand that it happens, my question is the prevalence. When I looked into banking cord blood I found a lot of ‘possible’ and one-off cases, but no actual statistics about how likely it was to be useful. That made it unpalatable, especially compared to the known benefits of delayed clamping.
This is really interesting! I had no idea about this industry but it seems fascinating.

Are you hiring?

Soon!! :D Find me on bookface & email me?
Bookface is private and only accessible to YC founders.
Oh yes sorry - kathryn@anjahealth.com
This is brilliant and I wouldn't be surprised if this doesn't lead to many years of extra life for people who get this for their children. I think in 60-70 years time the possibilities of this material being used for both injuries, diseases and life extension could be huge. And what a beautiful story to try to help people like your brother. I've no doubt you'll be hugely successful with it. Good luck.
Thank you so much! Your support means the world :)
In Ukraine there's a company called EmCell who has been using fetal stem cells for treating a wide range of diseases and autoimmune issues for the last 30 years; research for 30 years, clinical practice 25 years.

There's a free documentary on the clinic that can be watched that explains why they believe it's safe to inject fetal stem cells that are 7-12 weeks old into anyone; there are 50 million legal abortions done annually around the world, and that tissue is otherwise thrown out and considered bio-waste.

There are a number of diseases that aren't curable in North America, however based on their data/experience that it appears that if treated early enough before disease progression damages the healing mechanisms of the body, that different diseases can be not only stopped but also regress (heal/be cured).

Anyone else find the idea of using aborted fetal cells unsettling? There's just something really strange about it. I would 1000% be on board if there was some way to synthesize it artificially.
Not really, these cells are no longer being used, might as well do some good with them. Or are you suggesting people are getting abortions to harvest stem cells?
Ah I see - we’re from the umbilical cord so they’re a bit different from fetal stem cells!
Can you explain how umbilical cord tissue differs from placental tissue, and its potential/known uses? I realize this reply will probably get lost being 3 days later.
Umbilical cord stem cells are categorized as adult stem cells because a human being has formed. They are more stable. Embryonic stem cells from fetus are not and much more unstable. Umbilical cord blood would be treated as a medical waste otherwise.
Services exist since a very long time now. The reality in the field seems to be that doctors are skeptical of the benefits due to lack of research breakthroughs. If you store the cells for 20 years, it's also a question as to whether they are still usable or have degraded when stored for so long.

Curious if you have any thoughts and of course, good luck with your company!

They will be usable - no other research to demonstrate otherwise right now :) For sure - doctors are skeptical, but we've been able to reach OBs and convince them otherwise. Time will tell!
This is great! Couple of questions…

- Who owns the stem cells/blood?

- Can I move them to a different bank in the future if I choose to?

Parents sign an agreement with us that it's their property! You could, but it would be costly. There's not really ever a reason to. May as well have it stay put. Cryopreservation is cryopreservation.
> There's not really ever a reason to.

I thought the pricing was a monthly subscription. In that case I would want to be able to transfer to a similar, but more affordable option in the future if that becomes available.

Also 23andMe was purchased by an advertising company, so there is some precedent to be concerned with.

> All biological goods stored with Anja will stay in our New Jersey lab regardless of what happens to Anja as a business.

Can you explain this more? How is this guaranteed in the contract?

Oh I see. Yeah I think it depends on which bank youre working with. They may have their own policy!

We have an insurance guarantee :)

> We have an insurance guarantee

What does this mean?

Perhaps they are using an outside firm to do the actual harvesting and storing, and Anja is just handling marketing and financing? I think that would explain a lot of the comments, including this one.