I am not sure if we should call it laptop but a handheld PC [0] instead. It is the name, which was often used to miniaturized computers back in the first decade of XXI century (e.g., HP Jornada 720/728 [1]).
Interesting. Same thing happened to me at first, but now it is there. Maybe I posted the link too quickly, or does GDrive throttle?
By the way, the Download link usually works right away in these cases with google drive. The spinner is just the image preview loading. Although I've only previously seen this behavior while processing a video preview.
Yes, sorry I tried to use a random webapp and I thought optimization was set to no optimization.
I was just thinking it would be nice to have a bot/api/webapp that I could give my URL to and it would give me a set of links to at least a bit optimized images. Maybe something built into all IDEs, or is this a platform responsibility.
For example, the OP images were much larger in pixel size than necessary. When I look at them in their full size, it is also a noisy image. Certainly a 1/2 resize could be reasonable while not losing meaningful pixels. I know this is a game of trade-offs, but it would be nice to have a standard that had very low friction. I guess TinyPNG almost does this.
> I suppose the real problem is that it's too difficult to provide appropriately-sized images for different user agents.
I use a <picture> element with multiple versions as a <source>. This allows the browser to choose which size and format is best automatically. Many site generators will set these up automatically, with the right plugin. See: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/pi...
I noticed the image was extremely high quality but I never thought about checking its file size. It wasn't just that image either, the whole set of image are extremely large by web standard.
Now I am convinced JPEG XL is definitely the choice for me as next gen image codec.
Looks great, and takes back a couple of decades to when laptop / handheld design was ... not perfect ... but interesting, and had so much more variety.
Everytime I see one of these projects I get tempted to build one, but then quickly realize I would never actually use it. I would love to have a use case for it / excuse to build it though.
People that have something like this: what do you do with it?
I have a Pomera DM200, I sometimes take just this device to places and type up random story ideas and other sketches into it.
Ultimately modern laptops have nicer keyboards, but there's something fun about the constraints of devices (like just having no real formatting options, so you just type out stuff).
I think if you can imagine uses for the device in an offline environment you can have fun. Trying to interface with the modern web is always tough though... like "good web browser experience" is a hard ask
i like to have a small laptop that i can always carry around, ideally without needing an extra bag to carry it. it is used as a terminal to ssh into servers should i need to do work, and otherwise to take notes and keep a diary. browsing is optional, as my phone can do that too. for such a small device the difference in screensize is not that much better.
on this device i carry the most important documents, like ssh keys, etc. i could carry those on a usb stick too, but then i'd have to use up a usb port when working, and that's not always convenient, especially on the road.
for years this was an OLPC, followed by a GPD Pocket 1, and now a one mix 1s. my next device might be a pinephone with the keyboard add-on. before i discovered the pinephone keyboard i have been exploring raspberry pi builds as a better alternative, but none looked practical.
the Pomera DM200 looks nice, but for for USD500 i expect more. at least a larger screen, and linux support. the pinephone has the same size screen and it costs a third of this. even the GPD or one mix are cheaper and they are fully capable computers.
the Penkesu looks much better in that regard. at least the keyboard and screen size match and the cost should also be reasonable
The OS is based on BTRON which is/was an obscure desktop OS which today is only used because of it's non unicode character set which has a better coverage of historic Asian characters. What makes it interesting:
Fully windowed desktop OS which is somewhat touch friendly.
Comes with something like Apples HyperCard and those applications are drag and drop compatible on desktop and the PDA. http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/microscriptrefmanual19.html Those HyperCard like apps are as integrated into the desktop experience as folders are. The programming language for those HyperCard like things is nicer than BASIC but less complicated than modern programming languages. http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/microscriptrefmanual.html One could also program on the PDA if one had to.
OS quiet fully featured (in so far as the OS doesn't come with SSL as that wasn't a thing back then). The lineage of the OS comes from the embedded instead of the server world. This means that the OS is real-time (and multi tasking) capable and this is useful to make meager hardware seem more reactive instead server lineage OSes (Android/Linux) of being more optimized for throughput. I imagine on modern hardware it would be as fluid as iOS with the level of customisablity and approachability of old Apple desktops with HyperCards.
This is even more unbelievable when you consider the complete scope of TRON Project. I got a 60+ page document on its history and most interesting projects in German. However I need to sort out the rights for one image before I put i can put it online. Maybe I translate it to English one day.
32 comments
[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 94.3 ms ] thread[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handheld_PC
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jornada_(PDA)#Jornada_720
Not at home with photoshop but here is a re-sized (500px x 335px) image I made with a random webapp that comes in at 22KB.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rbvRSDD7xErzxMSwj__fKFIjNYa...
If anyone is wondering why I took the 3 minutes to do this, think of the energy savings at scale.
Also, super cool looking device!
By the way, the Download link usually works right away in these cases with google drive. The spinner is just the image preview loading. Although I've only previously seen this behavior while processing a video preview.
I suppose the real problem is that it's too difficult to provide appropriately-sized images for different user agents.
I was just thinking it would be nice to have a bot/api/webapp that I could give my URL to and it would give me a set of links to at least a bit optimized images. Maybe something built into all IDEs, or is this a platform responsibility.
For example, the OP images were much larger in pixel size than necessary. When I look at them in their full size, it is also a noisy image. Certainly a 1/2 resize could be reasonable while not losing meaningful pixels. I know this is a game of trade-offs, but it would be nice to have a standard that had very low friction. I guess TinyPNG almost does this.
I use a <picture> element with multiple versions as a <source>. This allows the browser to choose which size and format is best automatically. Many site generators will set these up automatically, with the right plugin. See: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/pi...
Compare: https://imgur.com/a/axLxDBT
Photoshop's "fair" JPEG settings result in something that's functionally indistinguishable and only 347KB.
Now I am convinced JPEG XL is definitely the choice for me as next gen image codec.
People that have something like this: what do you do with it?
Ultimately modern laptops have nicer keyboards, but there's something fun about the constraints of devices (like just having no real formatting options, so you just type out stuff).
I think if you can imagine uses for the device in an offline environment you can have fun. Trying to interface with the modern web is always tough though... like "good web browser experience" is a hard ask
https://goodereaderstore.com/products/kingjim-digital-memo-p...
on this device i carry the most important documents, like ssh keys, etc. i could carry those on a usb stick too, but then i'd have to use up a usb port when working, and that's not always convenient, especially on the road.
for years this was an OLPC, followed by a GPD Pocket 1, and now a one mix 1s. my next device might be a pinephone with the keyboard add-on. before i discovered the pinephone keyboard i have been exploring raspberry pi builds as a better alternative, but none looked practical.
the Pomera DM200 looks nice, but for for USD500 i expect more. at least a larger screen, and linux support. the pinephone has the same size screen and it costs a third of this. even the GPD or one mix are cheaper and they are fully capable computers.
the Penkesu looks much better in that regard. at least the keyboard and screen size match and the cost should also be reasonable
Fully windowed desktop OS which is somewhat touch friendly.
Comes with something like Apples HyperCard and those applications are drag and drop compatible on desktop and the PDA. http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/microscriptrefmanual19.html Those HyperCard like apps are as integrated into the desktop experience as folders are. The programming language for those HyperCard like things is nicer than BASIC but less complicated than modern programming languages. http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/microscriptrefmanual.html One could also program on the PDA if one had to.
OS quiet fully featured (in so far as the OS doesn't come with SSL as that wasn't a thing back then). The lineage of the OS comes from the embedded instead of the server world. This means that the OS is real-time (and multi tasking) capable and this is useful to make meager hardware seem more reactive instead server lineage OSes (Android/Linux) of being more optimized for throughput. I imagine on modern hardware it would be as fluid as iOS with the level of customisablity and approachability of old Apple desktops with HyperCards.
http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/tipogallery.html
http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/btron.html
I can't believe just how advanced it was for the time. Utterly surreal.