HN Explorer

Ask HN: Remote workers in US tech companies, how much do you work?

1 points by vkk8 ↗ HN
I live in a smaller European country where salaries are a lot lower than they are in the US. The upside is, I feel that the pace of work is also a bit easier; I get 5 weeks of paid vacation each year plus long(ish) parental leaves for each children born. Also, in reality, I don't have work nearly as much as my contract says I should be working. All around I would consider my work pace pretty chill.

I've been eyeing some American companies offering fully remote jobs with very high salaries and would consider applying, but I'm a bit anxious about the supposedly hard work culture in the US companies. So my question is, how many hours per day do people working on remote jobs in these companies _actually_ work? Do you have to be on the call around the clock if a critical bug needs to be patched? How much vacation do you get per year?

I get that probably higher paying positions are more stressful, but I would be pretty happy with something like 100k$, which seems to be in the lower end of US tech salaries.

7 comments

[ 2.4 ms ] story [ 29.6 ms ] thread
101008
I had experience in different US tech companies, as well as some European (all remote, European ones in "large" European countries).

In my experience, it depends completely on the company and the context. I worked hard (even weekends) for US companies where later in the year I barely worked (although I had to be online on Slack). So, take the step, it will be a great experience :)

vkk8
To be honest, I was pretty discouraged by the other comments here. I know many friends here, who are like me, and work 40 hours per week on paper, but in reality they have something to do maybe 50-75% of that time (sometimes even less). Since we are all remote now, that time is free time. Based on the comments here, in the US tech, the standard seems to be 40 hours a week minimum, plus more if you have any kind of responsibility.

I have a family and, while I like the idea of getting a bit more money, working 70 hour weeks even occasionally and having 2-4 weeks worth of holidays per years sounds worse than horrible to me. Now I have time for family, hobbies and work, all three. In an environment that makes me work around the year, basically without breaks, 40-70 hours a week would force me to pick only one or two out of the three (and one of them would have to be work).

ejb999
I am developer working for a very large 'non-tech' company; 100% WFH (even before covid because I don't live near any of the offices).

I only get 3 weeks of vacation a year - and usually have a hard time even using that; honestly if I had 5 weeks of vacation don't know what I would do with it - especially since covid has made it very undesirable to travel, so we will see once restrictions are lifted.

No one keeps track of my hours, but I easily do 60-70 hours a week, and where I work that is what gets you more money and/or promotions (Not the # of hours per per se, but the pace at which you get things done) - plenty of folks just 'coast along', but everyone knows who those people are, and they are the first fired when the budget gets cut.

vkk8
Do you mind if I ask how do you even manage to do 60-70 hours a week of productive technical work? I can do maybe 2-3 hours of programming a day before my concentration starts dropping. That plus whatever meetings I have gets me to maybe 4-5 hours of work per day, the rest is just dicking around while staying online on Teams (before it was chatting with people in the office, now it's doing whatever I want at home).

I know there are also people who work longer hours here where I live, but usually they are in some kind of management positions and majority of their time is spent in meetings. All the developers and technical people that I know tend to be a bit lazy. Maybe it's just my social bubble, though.

ejb999
Thing is, its not all technical work - thats the problem 20-25 +/- hours a week of meetings - so I put in the extra time so I can do the 40 hours of technical work on top of that.
daviddever23box
Your work hours might be pegged to local time, so consider that your actual hours may end up being longer / later as a consequence.

If you're a directly-responsible individual (DRI) / team lead / manager, your hours (and compensation) should go up. Don't accept anything less than $100K USD in your local currency equivalent if you're managing employees that are making more than that in their local currency; the power dynamic is fatally skewed otherwise.

12h days are not unheard of, though you can also work shorter days if the workload is light.

7thaccount
Depends on the company, but 40 hours a week minimum is pretty common where you're actually working the majority of it. Lots of meetings too that you might not feel are actual work as coordination is challenging regardless of WFH. Some weeks I work a lot more than 40 hours (especially closing out a big project), so maybe 70+. I wouldn't work for any company where that is the norm though as they've done plenty of studies to show humans aren't meant to work at that level for long. The diminishing returns are huge. As far as vacation, I think to get what you have, you'd need like 15+ years of experience at most companies. Generally an entry level employee in tech would be lucky to get 2 weeks of vacation plus maybe a week of sick time and a few holidays. I would not recommend working on a team with on-call responsibilities. I did that for 8 years and any weekend I was on-call, would be called frequently to fix obscure problems. Between the frequency of the calls and the difficulties in finding an answer to the hours of the calls (middle of the night), to even the existential dread of getting yet another call, I just wouldn't do it. They say pay is factored into that role, but it never is in my opinion.

$100k relative to what? Most traditional engineers with engineering degrees start at like $75k to $80k, and will reach $100k with at least 5 years of experience, but can decrease that by job hopping. I think that the majority of IT jobs (especially without a STEM background) are similar, but start a bit lower. $100k is extremely good money in plenty of places in the US as you can still get a starter house for $150k in plenty of places in the American South if you're in a suburb. $100k is less awesome in some place like New York city or silicon valley. I don't think too many tech workers start at $100k in the US. That is the cream of the crop that graduate from ivy league computer science programs and go straight to work at one of the FAANG companies. I think that is the exception rather than the norm.