Setting aside the absurd notion that form isn’t following function in existing aerospace design, can anyone knowledgeable opine on the claims made here about a vulvic craft being more aerodynamic than traditional “phallic” designs?
While this project’s intentions are unclear, I can tell you from my own college experience that there are some who take this seriously. At least while in college.
If it's a group of women that are seriously saying: "there's too many penises in space we should send more vulvas" it's hilarious.
If it's confirmed its indeed more aerodynamic and we are seeing the beggining of a new era of space vulvas that will be censored in news reports due to it's shape than all hope is lost but still hilarious.
20 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 58.5 ms ] threadThe video is very cringe.
Whatever turns you on, man!
What about geometric shape equity?
I'm offended that wheels are round! We need more representation of squares and triangles in wheels.
Let's get a petition going to change the laws of physics so we can use any shape we want.
Seriously though are they serious or is this a gag?
If it's an elaborate joke it's a great joke.
If it's a group of women that are seriously saying: "there's too many penises in space we should send more vulvas" it's hilarious.
If it's confirmed its indeed more aerodynamic and we are seeing the beggining of a new era of space vulvas that will be censored in news reports due to it's shape than all hope is lost but still hilarious.