One obvious distinction the article doesn't make, is between people fleeing their country temporarily with intent to return, vs. indefinitely. Syrian refugees have no expectation of ever going back to Syria. Ukrainian refugees can probably go back home within the year.
Many Ukraiians work abroad, mainly in Poland and Germany, but they need some investment for it. Now that so many Ukrainians are in Poland and in Germany, I doubt most will go back anytime soon, especially given the destruction back home.
Whether or not that's the case, they are not perceived as such. Europeans may be mistaken in believing Ukrainians just want temporary shelter and Syrians are coming to stay, but whether it's true or false doesn't matter. It's this belief that affects their attitude.
I did hear on the Bulgarian TV some Ukrainians openly saying: "We're gonna learn the language, we're gonna work in Bulgaria." That won't be news as most of our seasonal work was already done by Ukrainians, but speaking to Ukrainians who do seasonal work in Poland and Germany - they've shared to me that they were often treated as cattle.
It's still their home. You're applying your outsider judgement and not considering how the actual people involved might feel. A lot of those refugees are leaving for safety while someone stays behind to fight for a place they can return to.
They've always been black-and-white, and we all fall into the false dilemma fallacy, but now blatant racism is okay in the Western media once of a sudden.
I will not be lectured by India, a country who has taken in 10000[1] refugees from Afghanistan (a country a stone's throw away from them) while Hamburg alone as taken 35000[2] Afghan refugees alone.
If they've taken a lot of Ukrainian refugees, then your point holds a value; the point of their segment was the racism factor. If a country (let's say, India), it's not open to ANY refugees, then it's a different topic.
Until we genetically re-engineer humans to eliminate these primordial instincts, kinship will continue to matter (as the author notes, it is not unique to Europeans). In the current world, it is a short-lived society where it doesn't.
No this is colonial social conditioning. Those same white Europeans werent scoffing at Arab, Persian or Indian scholars in the Renaissance, Romans and Greeks intermarried with Egyptians and Indians, even in the midst of the Crusades Brungandians were making alliences with Siljuks against Italy and the Fatimids didnt fight the crusaders because they were allied to the Bayzentines. And the Ottomans were alloed with Britain at some times and with Germany in World War 2, Boris Johnson himself is a descendent of an Ottoman official. The Ottoman sultan even offered to help with the potato famine in Ireland but was rebuffed by the British queen for giving more than her. There IS kinship, there IS massive history but since the colonial era and probably propped by Darwin and the the Nazis, Europeans have got it into their minds that they are genetically superior and should not even fix the mess they made when they took down the Ottomans and divided the middle east in a compeletely nonsensical way. This isnt even going into the even more messy Cold War history.
No these Ukrainians here are actual war refugees, while a lot of people from middle east / north africa are just economic migrants. The obvious difference between men/women ratio in these successive waves is a demonstration of that. With economic migrants, women stay in the home country while men try to go look for opportunities in the west. This isn't a opportunistic wave here.
It's only racism for the people who want to see racism everywhere.
Germany welcomed more than 2 millions people during the 2015 refugee crisis, but altruism never enough for some here, who feel entitled to everything under pretense of victimhood.
Terrible things happen during conflicts that deserve consideration and a myopic focus. Is it wrong to highlight racism, or rape or the abuse of children? The most vulnerable are at risk and deserve attention now more than ever.
Didnt UK permit something like 50 visas for Ukrainian refugees so far?
BBC https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60640460 Fifty Ukrainians have been granted visas under a scheme for refugees with family links to the UK, the Home Office has announced. It is about 1% of the 5,535 people who have applied since the programme launched 48 hours earlier
28 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 34.9 ms ] threadThey probably won't go back if they can. Ukraine is a very poor country, at least by European standards. [1]
Because of their brave resistance to the invasion, we tend to see the country in an overly optimistic light.
[1]: It's the poorest country in Europe by nominal GDP per capita: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Ukraine
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugees_in_India#Afghanistan
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghans_in_Germany
Is Darwin and colonialism making babies act this way?
No these Ukrainians here are actual war refugees, while a lot of people from middle east / north africa are just economic migrants. The obvious difference between men/women ratio in these successive waves is a demonstration of that. With economic migrants, women stay in the home country while men try to go look for opportunities in the west. This isn't a opportunistic wave here.
It's only racism for the people who want to see racism everywhere.
Germany welcomed more than 2 millions people during the 2015 refugee crisis, but altruism never enough for some here, who feel entitled to everything under pretense of victimhood.
It depends on your definition of 'refugee'; economic, natural disaster or conflict.
I read a recent report in the Gruaniad that claimed the UK was 'not taking refugees' when in fact the UK was insisting those accepted obtain visas.
The quickest way to destroy public confidence in refugee programs is to allow a free-for-all for anyone who chooses to turn up unannounced.
Of course socialist administrations consider public support irrelevant, until they get voted out.
BBC https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60640460 Fifty Ukrainians have been granted visas under a scheme for refugees with family links to the UK, the Home Office has announced. It is about 1% of the 5,535 people who have applied since the programme launched 48 hours earlier