A follow up question: is there a jurisdiction that is hostile to Putin's regime and would not cooperate with Putin's police/special services requests, but not hostile to Russian Citizens willing to do business overseas?
Apparently China or India may be the main places you can find; personally I'd be a bit cautious with China.
The cat is out of the bag, this stuff will get worse in the future - it is very likely that businesses will need to have multiple payment processors/streams and their customers will need to be flexible.
I suspect many companies are going to be subject to some very lucrative lawsuits later, but for now they are doing exactly this (see this thread, the Namecheap one from earlier).
>The Kremlin is perhaps the world’s most prolific abuser of the Interpol notice system. As other governments have found, Interpol notices and diffusions (see “Methods of Transnational Repression”) are low-cost means for the Kremlin to harass and detain exiles.
>The Kremlin’s targeting of financier Bill Browder through Interpol Red Notices has made the tool famous, but it uses the tactic to an extraordinary extent, and often against targets far less prominent.
>Without more transparency at Interpol, it is difficult to determine why or how the Kremlin is able to use its notice system so extensively. Nevertheless, Russia is responsible for a staggering 38 percent of all public Red Notices in the world, while the United States is responsible 4.3 percent and China 0.5 percent.
>Russian authorities have even been able to use Red Notices to detain individuals residing in the United States for long periods of time. For instance, in two separate public cases in the last two years, Russian asylum seekers spent over a year in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention based on Russian-sourced Interpol Red Notices.
At this point Russian Interpol participation is corrupted. They are known to try to extradite dissidents on false charges... which are ignored by the Interpol officials.
That's the kind of behavior I'm seeking for a host country.
What I don’t understand is, if there are sanctions, why wasn’t everything stopped when they started? Why did it take over a week after the sanctions started?
> To the best of my knowledge, these aren't sanctions, just companies acting unilaterally to support Ukraine
Some of the sanctions ( like kicking out of SWIFT most Russian banks) make doing business in Russia extremely complicated, so even if there aren't direct sanctions forcing a pullout, they can indirectly have that effect.
Agreed, but the SWIFT problems shouldn't impact EU business accounts (which is what I suspect this is, based of the twitter profiles location in Tallinn).
Sanctions can be implemented with a "wind down" period for companies to gradually come into compliance with the sanctions. In the UK, for example, there is a wind down period expiring at 23:59 tonight for sanctions relating to "sovereign debt, loans and money market instruments".[1] The situation in the OP is not necessarily related to any sanctions though, it may be a voluntary act on the part of Wise.
It also takes time to figure out if, and in what way, a given company is affected by sanctions. Sometimes its straight forward, most of the time it is not.
thinking of it, it is hard to beleive we live in a democracy that impose all commercial entities to comply with proclaimed sanctions that didn't go through a vote.
I suppose it wouldn't make a difference given the popular opinion, but a vote would at least allow for argumentative debates since the impact on businesses and consumer is massive.
This isn't really a new concept. See the whole BDS / boycotting Israeli products idea
Israel is 20% Arab, Israel has plenty of anti-settlement political parties, even senior government members. When you boycott Israel you are boycotting the anti settlement people as well as the pro settlement people. And you are also boycotting the Christian and Muslim Arabs
This had a weird side effect when there was a boycott happening against Soda Stream, because they were made in a settlement. Well, Jews mostly don't work in factories in settlements, Palestinians do. The boycott worked, Soda Stream moved their factory to inside the green line, and all the Palestinians were fired.
Thanks @Wise for standing up to Putin and closing our business account because of the 'wrong' passport of the founder
Apparently, being blocked in Russia for refusing to comply with state surveillance laws and being detained at anti-Putin rallies is not enough punishment for us
How would Wise transfers even work with the sanctions? Not to mention the lack of liquidity in the market for Rubles...
Edit - really, I would like someone to explain exactly how Wise should accomplish RUB-USD/EUR transactions with the current sanctions and if they'd take that risk on themselves. Nothing like holding a falling knife...
Based on the tweet they are physically in Russia (talked about being detained for protesting against Putin). So guessing they've tried to make transactions in Russia.
We do not need to make transactions in Russia. It is not even possible now for biggest russian banks, and with new local regulation requiring a forced sale of 80% of incoming currency at a 'current' price, it doesn't even make any sense.
I worry that a lot of these sanctions are going to backfire. If I'm an average Russian citizen, maybe I'm against the war, or more likely I just don't feel very strongly about it. If the West then destroys my livelihood and financial wellbeing with sanctions, eventually my reaction is going to be something like, "f*k these NATO guys, they're ruining my life for something I have nothing to do with and can't do anything about anyway".
I was against the Iraq War back in 2003, but I would have been livid if the whole world punished ordinary Americans with sanctions, even though the majority of us voted against G.W. Bush in 2000. The fastest way to create unity among a group of people is to arbitrarily punish all of them together. This is, in part, why the military runs basic training the way it does.
The government sanctions are relatively well targeted at the Russian powers; it's all these companies running around and doing "virtue sanctions" that are hitting civilians.
And nobody dares sanction the actual gas that is flowing through the war zone itself ...
> The government sanctions are relatively well targeted at the Russian powers; it's all these companies running around and doing "virtue sanctions" that are hitting civilians.
Virtue sanctions? How do you expect those companies to operate in Russia with the rouble in freefall and SWIFT cut off?
The companies mentioned are NOT cutting off just Russians, they have been cutting off anyone with Russian citizenship, no matter where they may be located.
> What's the alternative? It's forcing Russians into tough decisions, hitting Putin and friends where it hurts, or letting Putin get away with it.
I honestly don't know what the right path is here. Sometimes all the choices are bad.
In all likelihood, Putin probably will get away with this in the long-term. Most of us are happy to change our Twitter profiles to a Ukrainian flag, but how many of us would go and fight in Ukraine ourselves, how many of us would willingly send our kids over there to fight? Not most of us, I suspect.
I think the best possible outcome, which still isn't great, is that the Ukrainian people turn this into a quagmire and the Russians leave. The Russian public, much like the public in the West probably doesn't want to send their kids to die in another country that hasn't attacked them.
Do sanctions actually work? Maybe, but I'm not 100% convinced. North Korea is still sabre rattling and developing nuclear weapons despite years of sanctions. Cuba hasn't buckled despite over 50 years of U.S. sanctions. Iran hasn't had a regime change despite all the economic levers pulled against them over the years. The boycott Israel movement hasn't stopped the construction of settlements.
> I think the best possible outcome, which still isn't great, is that the Ukrainian people turn this into a quagmire and the Russians leave.
I don't think a quagmire in your own country is ever a good outcome. I honestly believe it would be preferable for most civilians if Russia quickly wins the war rather than dragging it out for a decade until Russia withdraws.
Of course, ideally Russia will agree to a peace relatively soon, take a few things they already had (Crimea, parts of Donbas) and some security promises, and lick their wounds after the sanctions...
I happen to live in a country that was invaded by the USSR at the end of WWII and chose to trun arms against the Germans and help the USSR rather than face a protracted battle, Romania. This led to us losing a pretty big part of our country, Moldova, and staying as part of the Eastern bloc for the next 50 years. Still, no one thinks our forefathers should have bravely resisted the Allied invasion. Sure, the USSR's enemy was Nazi Germany, an even worse horrid disgusting regime, so the situation is definitely not identical by any means. But still, war takes such a horrendous toll on a population, particularly a protracted war, that almost anything is preferable.
I doubt the people of Crimea for example are suffering as much as if they had been through war - I'm not even sure they would welcome a Ukrainian operation to reconquer them (even though, to be clear, I don't believe Putin's referendum was anything other than a sham). I would also ask the 500,000 to 2 million killed afghans, and the 3 million wounded, if they are happy their deaths tore down the USSR, and would gladly go through that again.
Russians have a pretty good history of knocking off their leadership when things aren't going well for the general population. The next leaders aren't necessarily any better, but it's still the main leverage over Putin the West has right now.
It's still "Russians knocking off their leadership".
People aren't expecting Russians on the street to get rid of Putin. They're expecting that it will cause pressure on other Russian leaders to side with Russians and the West over Putin...
There are no 'other russian leaders'. Putin's political theater before the war was clearly aimed to make any russian official of note into an accomplice, publicly supporting the invasion. They have all made their bones and are all sanctioned by the EU and world countries now. So this course of events is highly unlikely.
Part of the risk of being a strongman-style leader is there's always someone waiting in the wings, and they don't have to have been previously prominent.
How's that going to backfire?
What you've presented as the "bad option" is the current status quo. Putin had sky high approval for decades and the Russian population has supported him while he strengthened his grip on power.
Yeah, ban on running a business abroad is definitely going to hit the public supporting Putin, right.
Also, he doesn't have sky high approval any longer. At the last elections, he could muster his percentage in the first tour with huge falsifications and disallowing any other credible candidate.
Lived in Moscow almost all of my life, have been a political activists for a few years, have 30+k subscribers on my Russian political tik-tok account. I talk to a lot of Russians both online and offline. The support and bloodthirst is real, I'd say at about 60% support this war. Russians saying that "we should just nuke the states and kill them all" are not something out of the ordinary.
Yeah right. They are so pro-war that the government recently made it a crime [1] punishable by up to 15 years in prison to be publically against the war or spreading information about it not coming from official sources.
Unfortunately NATO has been played into a corner. Sanctions are the only tool that NATO is willing to use right now (alongside lethal aid to Ukraine). What a lot of Western media is overlooking is that this invasion is modestly supported by the Russian population (20-50% depending on which sources you trust). As you said, these same Russians that support the invasion will ultimately blame NATO.
We are gambling that making life more difficult for the average Russian will result in regime change. There is an alternative where sanctions increase popular support for further escalation with NATO and/or Ukraine, in order to result in Ukraine being under the Russian sphere of influence _and_ dropping of sanctions.
The West has become an incompetent, incomprehensibly stupid bully with a gigantic hammer it calls "market theory". It doesn't so much identify and nullify threats so much as it generates market opinion to blindly hate and blacklist anything not considered "good".
I'm scared of not having a Ukraine flag in my Twitter handle - despite being Polish and supporting Ukranians in the actual conflict - because I'm scared of the zealot Westerners who might try to pillory me for holding unsavory opinions that go against the current marketable beliefs.
I understand how the West is responding and it's not productive, nor is it a "let's wait and see" kind of strategy. This is the same weapon they've been using on everyone else for the past decade. Race, sex, belief, now nationality. It's about turning everything into a market that they control, and we know how people targeted by it react to it. They go cold, MAGA, embrace the antithetical - maybe they even start dropping nukes.
When the current round of Western propaganda fades away, who will Russians blame? Only the ones swallowing it on Twitter will blame Putin. So once that's gone this becomes a huge problem for us.
The plan is to have the propaganda never end. More people now live their lives through the lens of the internet (or internet-first mentality), who have swallowed enough of the insanity that it's no longer a set of sponsored opinions but "reality". It's clear now that the West completely dominates all propaganda on the internet - I barely see any of the Russian stuff. The Russians can't even get a word out, and I'm wondering who the censors are trying to protect. I highly doubt it's us.
What I'm seeing here is the new Western approach to politics in the 21st century. Reality manufacturing and blacklisting, supported by relentless propaganda. The market does the state's dirty work now, and it's constantly hungry for its master's approval, like a big dumb ogre.
The only way to stop the Russian aggression is to negotiate with their government. Not put Russians into camps, metaphorical or otherwise.
EDIT: If you think I'm wrong, then consider the possible influences. Does doing this push Russia to end the invasion, or does it push them to continue it? Does this help us align ourselves with reality and face it, or does it blind us? Is this likely to make the Russians more willing to become allies, or less willing? etc. etc.
It's quite scary. While I support the Ukraine, I'm shocked with how little media discussion there is about American hypocrisy on this topic. This certainly in no way excuses Putin's actions, but it's quite amazing how our elected officials can stand there straight-faced shaking their finger in disapproval at Putin after the number of countries we've invaded in my lifetime alone. Good God, I can't even imagine what we'd do if we got into a conflict with Mexico and the Russians we sending them weapons. Oh wait, that happened with Cuba in the 1960's and we threatened to wipe the Soviet Union off the map with nuclear weapons.
Sure Americans did invade countries and kill civilians and now they act hypocritically.. but on the other side, are there any examples even remotely approaching the hamfisted Russian manners in Chechnya, Syria and Ukraine? Perhaps Israel toward Palestinians but we're talking about USA here.
Regarding Chechnya, I want to remind you that you are talking about an insurgency that was very used to commit terror attacks on civilians and take hostages to negotiate their terms. Including hundreds of children.
Yes. I am talking about civilian casualties, you strawmanning with insurgents. Or why did you mention them, what is your reasoning? "They killed hundred our children so we kill thousand of theirs?"
The side that takes children as hostages of the 'other' side is not above using their own civilians as a human shield so people like you would lament their sufferings.
What next, you'll be judgemental about population of Berlin when it was taken from the Nazis?
So let's not judge the US either. And if you're satisfied with the overall result (like Chechen warlord being #2 man in Russia)...then it's all okay I guess.
I'm not concerned with hypocrisy, we're all hypocrites. My concern is that they didn't even consider dealing with accusations of hypocrisy. They don't care, because the level of politics is so low that I'd start comparing it to tribal warfare. Just get the tribe members riled up to do what we want, no one is going to meaningfully challenge what we do anyway.
They're setting us all up to mindlessly support their reckless "missions". And this shows they're not competent in creating or managing a stable system, and have devolved to the level of small tribes in terms of political thought.
We tried that for months in the leadup to the invasion. If Putin wanted to negotiate, he should have negotiated. Instead he played for time by deliberately making demands he knew we couldn't meet.
Why should we assume, after that show, that he'll be reasonable now?
The Ukranian alliance is negotiating, per your own link.
That Russian negotiating position is not serious. No nation will recognize any concession inconsistent with Ukraine's sovereignty (all three demands are), nor should they. Russia has no leverage to achieve any of those goals, and the longer it goes on, the less they have.
> The West has become an incompetent, incomprehensibly stupid bully with a gigantic hammer it calls "market theory". It doesn't so much identify and nullify threats so much as it generates market opinion to blindly hate and blacklist anything not considered "good".
If Americans had faced consequences from having elected Bush once, and responded to that rationally instead of emotionally, they probably wouldn't have elected him again for a second term.
> If Americans had faced consequences from having elected Bush once, and responded to that rationally instead of emotionally, they probably wouldn't have elected him again for a second term.
True, but most people respond to most things emotionally, most of the time.
The future dictionary definition of cutting off our nose to spite our face but banning Russian oil will make Twitter happy for the next 8-12 hours until the next move with zero thought given to the long term consequences.
China might be our only hope to avoid WW3. It was just a few days ago that banning Russian oil was not going to happen but Twitter gets what it wants in 2022. Twitter wants a no fly zone and WW3.
If these sanctions or unilateral support moves were well thought out they could have strengthen the Russian opposition and weaken Putin hold on power, by only allowing some of friendly actors to do business/move money around. Yes, it's complicated but could have been a possible solution instead of using the same paintbrush which may backfire in the most spectacular way. These companies who suddenly drop the business, close bank accounts and so on create fear in their customers all over the world, some of them would choose to do business with companies that respect contracts and allow grace periods for their customers to migrate to other services.
Ah, yes, the ‘response’, the ‘sanctions’. I'm sure that Germany and Poland will also stop buying natural gas from Russia, to hit Putin and his buddies where they actually give non-zero shits. Any day now—after all, everyone is so enraged, the EU has to punish the people making the decisions!
89 comments
[ 13.1 ms ] story [ 656 ms ] threadThe cat is out of the bag, this stuff will get worse in the future - it is very likely that businesses will need to have multiple payment processors/streams and their customers will need to be flexible.
Also, they are in cahoots with Putin.
for residents there are no restrictions for doing business
That is much harder to defend again because companies don't care, and there's no legal recourse.
although, i'm pretty sure companies based in EU can't discriminate against EU residents
we have the best legal framework in the world when it comes to privacy and human rights
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpol#Abusive_requests_for_...
https://freedomhouse.org/report/transnational-repression/rus...
>The Kremlin is perhaps the world’s most prolific abuser of the Interpol notice system. As other governments have found, Interpol notices and diffusions (see “Methods of Transnational Repression”) are low-cost means for the Kremlin to harass and detain exiles.
>The Kremlin’s targeting of financier Bill Browder through Interpol Red Notices has made the tool famous, but it uses the tactic to an extraordinary extent, and often against targets far less prominent.
>Without more transparency at Interpol, it is difficult to determine why or how the Kremlin is able to use its notice system so extensively. Nevertheless, Russia is responsible for a staggering 38 percent of all public Red Notices in the world, while the United States is responsible 4.3 percent and China 0.5 percent.
>Russian authorities have even been able to use Red Notices to detain individuals residing in the United States for long periods of time. For instance, in two separate public cases in the last two years, Russian asylum seekers spent over a year in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention based on Russian-sourced Interpol Red Notices.
That's the kind of behavior I'm seeking for a host country.
(I know that oil and gas aren’t sanctioned)
So many stories of it having an impact on those on our side, that just happen to have a Russian or Belarusian passport.
Even people that have already fled after previous crackdowns. They don't just get magical new passports.
luckily, identity verification can be done with EU-residence permit and hopefully companies don't start discriminating Russians abroad
Some of the sanctions ( like kicking out of SWIFT most Russian banks) make doing business in Russia extremely complicated, so even if there aren't direct sanctions forcing a pullout, they can indirectly have that effect.
[1] https://sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/uk-introduces-new-fi...
I suppose it wouldn't make a difference given the popular opinion, but a vote would at least allow for argumentative debates since the impact on businesses and consumer is massive.
Israel is 20% Arab, Israel has plenty of anti-settlement political parties, even senior government members. When you boycott Israel you are boycotting the anti settlement people as well as the pro settlement people. And you are also boycotting the Christian and Muslim Arabs
This had a weird side effect when there was a boycott happening against Soda Stream, because they were made in a settlement. Well, Jews mostly don't work in factories in settlements, Palestinians do. The boycott worked, Soda Stream moved their factory to inside the green line, and all the Palestinians were fired.
As for Palestinian Israelis stance on BDS, just ask them. Silencing the Palestinian minorities in Israel is part of the problem.
Nitter is working, not sure what Twitter is doing (maybe censoring?)
Thanks @Wise for standing up to Putin and closing our business account because of the 'wrong' passport of the founder
Apparently, being blocked in Russia for refusing to comply with state surveillance laws and being detained at anti-Putin rallies is not enough punishment for us
Edit - really, I would like someone to explain exactly how Wise should accomplish RUB-USD/EUR transactions with the current sanctions and if they'd take that risk on themselves. Nothing like holding a falling knife...
Anyhow thanks for protesting, hopefully it's all over soon.
I was against the Iraq War back in 2003, but I would have been livid if the whole world punished ordinary Americans with sanctions, even though the majority of us voted against G.W. Bush in 2000. The fastest way to create unity among a group of people is to arbitrarily punish all of them together. This is, in part, why the military runs basic training the way it does.
And nobody dares sanction the actual gas that is flowing through the war zone itself ...
Virtue sanctions? How do you expect those companies to operate in Russia with the rouble in freefall and SWIFT cut off?
I honestly don't know what the right path is here. Sometimes all the choices are bad.
In all likelihood, Putin probably will get away with this in the long-term. Most of us are happy to change our Twitter profiles to a Ukrainian flag, but how many of us would go and fight in Ukraine ourselves, how many of us would willingly send our kids over there to fight? Not most of us, I suspect.
I think the best possible outcome, which still isn't great, is that the Ukrainian people turn this into a quagmire and the Russians leave. The Russian public, much like the public in the West probably doesn't want to send their kids to die in another country that hasn't attacked them.
Do sanctions actually work? Maybe, but I'm not 100% convinced. North Korea is still sabre rattling and developing nuclear weapons despite years of sanctions. Cuba hasn't buckled despite over 50 years of U.S. sanctions. Iran hasn't had a regime change despite all the economic levers pulled against them over the years. The boycott Israel movement hasn't stopped the construction of settlements.
I don't think a quagmire in your own country is ever a good outcome. I honestly believe it would be preferable for most civilians if Russia quickly wins the war rather than dragging it out for a decade until Russia withdraws.
Of course, ideally Russia will agree to a peace relatively soon, take a few things they already had (Crimea, parts of Donbas) and some security promises, and lick their wounds after the sanctions...
I doubt the people of Crimea for example are suffering as much as if they had been through war - I'm not even sure they would welcome a Ukrainian operation to reconquer them (even though, to be clear, I don't believe Putin's referendum was anything other than a sham). I would also ask the 500,000 to 2 million killed afghans, and the 3 million wounded, if they are happy their deaths tore down the USSR, and would gladly go through that again.
Who cares about the long term though? All that matters is what we can tweet about this afternoon.
People aren't expecting Russians on the street to get rid of Putin. They're expecting that it will cause pressure on other Russian leaders to side with Russians and the West over Putin...
"Why are coups always led by colonels?" https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/02/22/why-are-coups-always-le...
Also, he doesn't have sky high approval any longer. At the last elections, he could muster his percentage in the first tour with huge falsifications and disallowing any other credible candidate.
Unfortunately, no. A LOT of Russian citizens are enthusiastically pro-war, and it's very hard to de-program them from state-run propaganda machine.
[1]: https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-60594110
We are gambling that making life more difficult for the average Russian will result in regime change. There is an alternative where sanctions increase popular support for further escalation with NATO and/or Ukraine, in order to result in Ukraine being under the Russian sphere of influence _and_ dropping of sanctions.
I'm scared of not having a Ukraine flag in my Twitter handle - despite being Polish and supporting Ukranians in the actual conflict - because I'm scared of the zealot Westerners who might try to pillory me for holding unsavory opinions that go against the current marketable beliefs.
I understand how the West is responding and it's not productive, nor is it a "let's wait and see" kind of strategy. This is the same weapon they've been using on everyone else for the past decade. Race, sex, belief, now nationality. It's about turning everything into a market that they control, and we know how people targeted by it react to it. They go cold, MAGA, embrace the antithetical - maybe they even start dropping nukes.
When the current round of Western propaganda fades away, who will Russians blame? Only the ones swallowing it on Twitter will blame Putin. So once that's gone this becomes a huge problem for us.
The plan is to have the propaganda never end. More people now live their lives through the lens of the internet (or internet-first mentality), who have swallowed enough of the insanity that it's no longer a set of sponsored opinions but "reality". It's clear now that the West completely dominates all propaganda on the internet - I barely see any of the Russian stuff. The Russians can't even get a word out, and I'm wondering who the censors are trying to protect. I highly doubt it's us.
What I'm seeing here is the new Western approach to politics in the 21st century. Reality manufacturing and blacklisting, supported by relentless propaganda. The market does the state's dirty work now, and it's constantly hungry for its master's approval, like a big dumb ogre.
The only way to stop the Russian aggression is to negotiate with their government. Not put Russians into camps, metaphorical or otherwise.
EDIT: If you think I'm wrong, then consider the possible influences. Does doing this push Russia to end the invasion, or does it push them to continue it? Does this help us align ourselves with reality and face it, or does it blind us? Is this likely to make the Russians more willing to become allies, or less willing? etc. etc.
It's quite scary. While I support the Ukraine, I'm shocked with how little media discussion there is about American hypocrisy on this topic. This certainly in no way excuses Putin's actions, but it's quite amazing how our elected officials can stand there straight-faced shaking their finger in disapproval at Putin after the number of countries we've invaded in my lifetime alone. Good God, I can't even imagine what we'd do if we got into a conflict with Mexico and the Russians we sending them weapons. Oh wait, that happened with Cuba in the 1960's and we threatened to wipe the Soviet Union off the map with nuclear weapons.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budyonnovsk_hospital_hostage_c...
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kizlyar%E2%80%93Pervomayskoye_...
[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_theater_hostage_crisis
[4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beslan_school_siege
What next, you'll be judgemental about population of Berlin when it was taken from the Nazis?
The Vietnamese too.
They're setting us all up to mindlessly support their reckless "missions". And this shows they're not competent in creating or managing a stable system, and have devolved to the level of small tribes in terms of political thought.
And get sent to prison? There is no negotiation in a country without free speech.
Why should we assume, after that show, that he'll be reasonable now?
The Russians have changed their demands since the conflict started, here they are currently: https://twitter.com/BlessedCloudz/status/1501095011584077826
That Russian negotiating position is not serious. No nation will recognize any concession inconsistent with Ukraine's sovereignty (all three demands are), nor should they. Russia has no leverage to achieve any of those goals, and the longer it goes on, the less they have.
Ain’t that the truth.
True, but most people respond to most things emotionally, most of the time.
Least surprising thing ever.
The future dictionary definition of cutting off our nose to spite our face but banning Russian oil will make Twitter happy for the next 8-12 hours until the next move with zero thought given to the long term consequences.
China might be our only hope to avoid WW3. It was just a few days ago that banning Russian oil was not going to happen but Twitter gets what it wants in 2022. Twitter wants a no fly zone and WW3.