Ask HN: How can I prepare for hard economic times?

180 points by xupybd ↗ HN
With massive drops in productivity and increases in government spending the economy was hurting. Now with Russia attacking Ukraine oil prices are going to hurt the economy more.

I'm worrying about the future for me and my young family.

Do you have any advice for someone with dependents during this time?

339 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 271 ms ] thread
Spend less. Save more. Invest wisely. sharpen your skills.
If you think its coming, move your money to hedges. But people have been predicting the next big crash for the last 5 years to no avail, so don’t be surprised if you miss out on major gains.
Really? Everything points to 'economy is fucked for the foreseeable future', people are worrying about possible food and energy shortages, and your take is 'don't forget your FOMO though, stonks still go up'?
Generally, the best time to invest is precisely when everyone else is pessimistic about the market. When I say invest, I mean true investing. Long time horizon.

Like others have said, that’s aside from the point. You are more likely to lose than gain by timing the market. That’s what the GP is getting at.

If one has assets, my advice is to diversify them appropriately.
You mean like in 2020 when the entire world was shut down because of COVID?

Or in 2018 when a trade war between china and US was just around the corner?

Or in 2016 when Brexit was the fall of the EU and Trump just got elected?

There's always something, and it's never clear that that something is going to actually be the real deal.

This is a good point. My fear is that thing just keep compounding.

If tensions rise we could see China and the west getting less friendly. I live in the bottom of the Pacific and we rely heavily on Chinese trade.

If you’re so confident, buy shorts and VIX calls. The stock market has proven to be largely detached from economic reality in the last few years, so don’t think any few indicators are proof that anything will happen.
That’s not what GP is saying. They are not saying you shouldn’t take steps to diversify and reduce risk. But conventional wisdom is that you can’t time the market, so you shouldn’t necessarily expect to beat the market by selling now and buying back in later when the war is over.
Everything has always pointed to the economy being fucked up for the foreseeable future. Many careers have been made on exploiting that fear.

They only thing that really counts in the end is that you, personally, have enough revenue to cover your expenditures. If not, increase the former and decrease the latter until you do. You may need to adjust your expectations too.

Nasdaq is down 19% for the year.

Looking at one of the best biotech hedge funds, YoY% is -5% (March 2021-March 2022).

These don't qualify as a major gain in my book.

The "major gains" don't come during the time in which all signs seem to point towards the end of the world being near.

The gains materialize when the end of the world that everyone expected yesterday eventually fails to materialize.

> predicting the next big crash for the last 5 years to no avail

It's precisely when no one (i.e mainstream media) is expecting, things go south. E.g 2008

However, ppl predicting crash will be right eventually because boom-bust happens in cycles. We just don't know when. Even a broken clock shows the right time twice a day.

some people have been predicting economic growth and are now predicting a recession... so there's that. the bond market is sending signals already, see LQD, HYG, JNK.
in theory isn't going into debt before the big crunch the best move with inflation?
in case of fixed interest rates I guess so... yachts for everyone!
I was thinking more of using the debt to fortify. Maybe metals... or property.
>I was thinking more of using the debt to fortify. Maybe metals... or property.

"just trust me bro"

haha yeah no. I'm not advising anyone. i was more asking questions/speculating.

pretty good chance i wont do any of this.

unless the interest rates increase... or you lose your job. Back in 2007-2008 R&D was one the 1st to be disposed of.
If the crash is inflationary, then yes. If deflationary, then no. Will the future be more inflationary than the market currently expects?
If your country has a central bank, I promise you the crash is going to be inflationary.
I think a more measured stance is that the crash WON'T be (significantly) deflationary.

If the crash is "naturally" deflationary, the central banks have now shown a commitment to sustaining inflationary policy to keep inflation at target.

But in the case of a "naturally" inflationary recession (stagflation), central banks will be hesitant to ramp up deflationary policy, because regaining employment levels will be a higher priority, and deflationary policy tends to hurt employment.

I have no investment advice for you, but it's always a good idea to streamline your economy, so that you can manage with less if something happens.

Make sure to have a small cash reserve so that you can manage for a while even if something devastating happens. Make sure to have a small stockpile of food at home so that you can make those money last longer. As a bonus, this will also count as basic prepping, and you'll be able to handle things like being snowed in for a week without too much problems (assuming you live where such a thing is possible).

Also cut down on non-mortage debt if possible, and make sure things like streaming subscriptions can be cancelled at a minute's notice; If you end up losing part or a lot of your income then you don't want to be stuck paying for things you don't really need (Spotify, Netflix etc).

Thanks, we don't have any non mortgage debt. Our mortgage is relatively low compared to most.

I'm not looking to invest, I just want to make sure I provide food and shelter for my wife and child.

Good idea to have a plan to rapidly reduce spending. I think I'll see what I can cut now. There are things I host that can be cancelled. No more VPS to host a personal email server I hardly use.

Not to encourage you to waste money, and there's definitely benefit in reducing clutter, but saving $4/mo on a VPS is unlikely to make a significant difference.
You're right but if I can find 20 similar costs to cut out I can start to make a difference.
That is the right attitude. Spotify, YouTube, Netflix... it all adds up.
Yes but OTOH when you're unemployed is when you have the most time to really use these services.
Leave the city.
I actually am doing this.

With Covid-lockdown and remote jobs, you can drastically cut your expense if you can move out of the city.

I am thinking of establishing secondary rural location and investing in full off grid capability
If I could afford that I'd love to do so.

I'm aware of the work it takes to live off the land. I don't have the skill or fitness to do so but still dream of trying that one day.

I'd recommend the contrary: stay or move to the city at least if you can own an apartment.

- housing: pick in a flat to keep your energy costs low (neighbors heat one another), and make sure you can walk to a park or a river. Fight to make your city more walkable and bikeable, and support your local businesses. Make sure to live close to people you like or to build new relationship (can't beat cities for that!). I love my neighbors and we regularly organize meetings to ensure every one is happy (that was so awesome during lockdowns, I never felt better surrounded). Being in a city means you stay close to people you like (so important during harsh times) and have more transportation options. I can walk anywhere: doctors, police, markets, train station, etc. Note that my French grand-parents always said that WWII was much easier for townspeople (the bigger the city, the better) and given their experience, I fully trust them when planning for harsh times.

- transportation: I spend ~€10 per month for my transportation needs (I own a cheap, light bike to go to work and move around). I take the subway/train sometime (when I'm too tired to bike) but it's much cheaper than all other options.

- food: I'm a member of a coop i.e we partnered with a local, organic farmer to commit to deliver all his production directly to us, for the whole year and at a fixed cost (around ~€15/week for a big basket of vegetables). I opted to get other produces from the coop, from other farmers/artisans: bread (1.5 kg/week), flours, oils, fruits (apples, pears, oranges, pomelos, kakis, berries…), café, etc. No distribution and overhead cost (we run everything ourselves, and do the distributions once a week). The inflation is very limited inflation (almost zero logistics costs, little impact of market prices) and at least one year of visibility and cash. This helped me become vegetarian: the food is so good, cheap and more sustainable. Coops let you have the benefits of the the city and the countryside, and you can't better help farmers (we work together to ensure they invest in the long term, protect their health, use as little fertilizers and pesticides as possible…).

Excellent advice. Additionally, the house can be owned (and even built) by a housing coop. Most housing coops are meant to build a neighborly community.
When economic hardship hits crime rates spike and they spike worse in cities I don't want to be even near cities with sky high rent and a big homeless population. A community doesn't need much hardship to become unstable.
Related:

Ask HN: What tips do you have for weathering a recession? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15798401 - Nov 2017 (104 comments)

Ask HN: How are you preparing yourself for a recession? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22527383 - Mar 2020 (148 comments)

And in both cases the impending recession was not as imminent as the posters likely expected.
It's a case of "hope for the best but prepare for the worst". I mean the threat of another world - or nuclear - war is looming.

But that's me / selfish, imagine being Ukranian and having to leave the country. I hope they saw it coming and prepared accordingly.

COVID-19 induced a recession all around the globe
That is technically true. Though the duration and severity did vary (and the definition of recession also varies around the globe). For example the U.K. consider the recession to have lasted 5 quarters whereas in the USA recovery (in some macroeconomic statistics) was faster with the economy being considered to be in recession for just two months. I don’t think a two-month recession is particularly concerning though a repeat of the GFC would be.
Diversify you risks. As much as you can: ETFs, property, rents, commodities, crypto, private funds, currencies.
Genuine question. How does retail investor invest in commodities which are all future contracts?
There are commodity ETFs that use future contracts or sometimes just buy physical metals. Some funds buy stocks of commodity producers which are expected to be highly correlated with commodity itself.

Also in Europe there are Forex brokers that offer contracts (CFDs) on commodities, but there are a lot of scammy firms in this area, and the spreads charged are usually hefty.

(according to wikipedia in US CFDs are banned)

If you have a stable job and a fixed mortgage you’ll be okay regardless of inflation. Inflation really only affects those who hold debt or hold cash. As public inflation numbers increase, make sure you are getting a commensurate increase in salary.
It's the stability of my job that worries me. I see our expenses at work climbing and our sales dropping.
> As public inflation numbers increase, make sure you are getting a commensurate increase in salary.

Because that's easy to do for everyone?

> Because that's easy to do for everyone

Is it? I don’t think it is. Why do you think it is?

That was exactly my point. It's absolutely not easy to do. I laughed when I read that.
I’m confused. If you don’t think it’s easy why would you laugh? I thought you were trying to tell me it’s so easy and trivial that it’s not worth mentioning, which might be true for you but it’s definitely not true for everyone.
Having a rough idea of how portfolio management works would be a good start. Logically, having all of your money in one bank(or asset, or whatever you are used to) is not a good idea since you're exposing yourself to a single point of failure(if that one asset/bank fails, you're screwed). You could have for example, 50% of your capital in one bank, 25% in another, 25% in cryptocurrency stables(currencies that keep an almost fixed value) and in this way you're reducing your risk on one side and raising it in other assets. There are entire books about how to manage money and risk that explain in detail some common patterns and things to avoid when managing money. Of course this is not financial advice, we all know that finance is a dangerous world and copying what someone else is doing may not bring you the same results.
Depends on where you are in the world. In the UK, there's this handy flowchart

https://ukpersonal.finance/flowchart/

The essence is to have a budget. Understand exactly how much you spend and where you spend it. Once that's done, you can work out where (if anywhere) you can save money. It might be as simple as cutting out Netflix, or as complicated as refinancing all your debt.

Hi, that's a nice flow chart. Just one thing that I don't understand: Step 1. Make minimum payments on all debts. What does it mean? Isn't it better to pay all debts as fast as possible?
If you can, it is better in the long term, but if you're going through a tough time, struggling to make ends meet, then minimum payments might get you going an extra month, rather than getting you in the red immediately.
You should re-gander at the flow chart. I looked and noticed a "is a debt high rate? pay it off first" logic flow there.

You can't just "pay everything off", and so the above chart prioritizes things which have highest interest, as pay down aggressively first.

There are other steps involving overpaying debt, they just happen at different stages. They're in step 1, 4 and 8.
If you don't pay the minimum, that tends to make creditors unhappy. Paying the minimum balance stops them from "escalating" - which may mean anything from angry letters to court proceedings.
I think the idea here is that if the debt is less than 10% APY you’re better off building a emergency fund and can pay off the debts in later steps. With the emergency fund you’re less likely to find yourself in a situation where you take on more debt.
I still hope we can avoid the full blown recession, but everyone should be prepared, Europe will be hit the hardest, US should be in better position.
Simulate various scenarios. The point is to have made some tough decisions ahead of time, while you still have some peace of mind. Because the decisions you make now will be of higher quality than the ones you make when you are under more stress.

How would you scale down your expenses (if at all?) if your real income decreased by 10 %? What about 50 %? How long could you survive if you end up with no income? What consumption can you reduce, and what can you cut out entirely? When will you start cutting some things out? How much longer will that make any savings last?

Similarly, how would you scale up the household income if your expenses increased? At what rate can you withdraw from any savings?

A secondary benefit of this exercise is that it lets you find the pain points and see if you can do something now to limit their consequences later. (Is there e.g. preventative maintenance you can do on a car or your teeth that would avoid a more expensive breakdown later?)

----

In contrast to many others, I don't place such a high value on having an exact day-to-day budget. Generally, both expenses and income follow a fairly statistically stable pattern, i.e. it averages out.

You do want to know what the averages are, of course, but you don't need to meticulously track daily expenses and income to learn that -- it's enough to go back in history and sample, say, every sixth day. Much less work for basically all the same benefits.

Keep in mind the question is not about "likelyhood" of an economic recession. It's not a risk assessment. The question is about what would you do to deal with a recession better. An "it's unlikely" answer feels off topic to me.
The OP is positing reasons for why they believe an economic recession might be in the books in their message. They aren’t preparing for an economic recession because they like it. Providing reasoning for why that reasoning may not hold seems on topic.
The problem is not the midterms. The problem is that the world has been thoroughly spooked by the West cutting off Russia from trade and payment systems. Countries like India, China and Saudi Arabia are already moving to other currencies for international trade. When that trickle becomes a flood, then the dollar will crash - because there's nothing holding it up apart from its reserve status. You already have $5 per gallon gas. Then it will be $10 and you'll have to find ways to buy food without getting in a car and driving the few miles to the grocery store. It's going to be nasty.
Nah, the USD will be fine. Where are you going to go? China won't let you use the yuan and everyone knows they'd be even more controlling with it.

See Question D on https://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/ukraine/.

Also, USD has actually gotten stronger in the last month, and the sanctions were mostly on EUR anyway.

Russia is just going to trade with China and the rest of Southeast Asia and vice-versa. India is going to trade with Russia. Saudi Arabia is going to trade with Russia. Russia has things that nations actually need: wheat, oil, gas, nickel and so on.
How employable (or otherwise earning capable) are you? If 10% of people lost their jobs, that would be a big recession. Would you be one of them, and if you were, would you have trouble funding another job that pays as well? It depends on your industry, current job, experience, network, personality, etc. If you're a philosophy professor, it may be tough to get the same job. If you're in a non-faddish in-demand area of software, with lots of industry connections, you can probably keep a good job regardless of recession. You need to be honest about this with yourself.
We spent quite a bit of time thinking about mortgage repayments recently, and the overwhelmingly conclusion was to optimise for minimising short term repayments. The rationale was that with a young family our expenses are fairly high whilst our income is likely to increase in future.

The consequence of this is to prioritise a long mortgage over total repayments and to not necessarily pay off as much as possible, even keeping money back for day to day spending, assuming that's budgeted properly. Obviously there is a trade off; the smaller you can get your mortgage the more flexibility you have around adjusting repayments to help with living costs.

The long term view of inflation also suggests it might be better to hold more debt to ease things now. Though obviously that depends on how your wages might change in the longer run.

Been wondering this too without much of a conclusive answer.

Gold is already jumped so that is too late. Crypto seems correlated with stocks.

I’m counting on a large gap between salary and expenses to save my ass

Something you should do, assuming that your salary is sufficient to allow you to do so, starting after month 3-6 of employment. Live on a budget one level below your means, and build that to two levels over time. Add some months of savings, again if your salary allows, and you should be save.
I think your analysis is rash.

Instead of eliminating an asset completely, come up with an estimate of its value to the economy in the future, relative to the other assets (do this to cash also). Then, target your portfolio to match that distribution.

While gold jumped, it doesn't mean it's over. And while crypto has been correlated with stocks, it still has some non-correlated part, introducing diversification, and you certainly don't need leverage to target a desired volatility.

Other items to consider:

* fertilizer (food prices going up means fertilizer will do the same; but it has doubled in the past year)

* farmland REIT

* office REIT (if you think the economy comes back to the office)

* Ukrainian stocks ("buy when there's blood on the streets" also means "invest when the country most needs it")

> * Ukrainian stocks ("buy when there's blood on the streets" also means "invest when the country most needs it")

Keep in mind buying stocks in a public company doesn't directly "support" it; buying stuff from them, or buying their bonds, does. This is basically the issue with ESG index funds.

You might not be helping the company itself, but its current stockholders desperate for cash.

They might need to buy food or flee using the money, and by bidding up the stock prices you help them (even if just a bit).

Gold and crypto are means to make money, not to prepare for hard economic times because you put your money at risk.

Preparing for hard economic times will involve having enough of a buffer to survive the loss of a job, and to have a stable job.

How secure is your job/industry? Not every sector will be hit equally.

Now might not be the best time to work in a startup that sells discretionary goods/services.

If you've got a solid job in an industry not too vulnerable to supply chain shocks or high interest rates you should weather the next downturn, as long as your expenditure is under control.

Work for a company that is protected and you will be okay. Food, soap, and other basic boring stuff will be in demand. Luxuries not as much, so games might be bad, or as cheap entertainment they might do good as people buy the games that will keep them all year to avoid the expensive entertainment they did instead. Really it is a guess as to what will do well.

Most people have a job in bad times. The real problem is your wages won't keep pace with inflation so you have to be careful.

Pay off debts now. Get an emergency cash fund going. Max out your retirement savings (so you can afford to save nothing if needed).

Last, but most important: you don't know what is coming. Enjoy life as best you can now.

Paying off debt is usually good financial advice, but it is arguably the wrong thing to do if you expect higher and higher inflation (which you mentioned is your expectation).

If you expect inflation to keep increasing, then one of the financially smart things to do would be to take as much debt as possible and purchase hard assets with the debt (such as land or commodities).

For me personally, I wouldn't follow this advise because I don't like the psychological burden of being indebted. I just wanted to highlight how higher inflation expectations disrupts traditional saving advice. It nullifies the idea of hoarding lots of cash.

Correction: paying off fixed rate debt is arguably the wrong thing to do. By all means, take a good, hard look at any variable or extremely high interest rate debt.
Keep in mind that if you get your advice from the internet, the one constant thing you'll see is everyone is always claiming the economy is about to collapse and there's about to be hyperinflation. (And yes, we are seeing inflation for the rest of this year. No gigantic Volcker rate hikes though.)

I don't know why they don't constantly predict deflationary spirals instead, which are even worse, but it's probably childhood memories of the 70s.

The question was about bad times not how to invest if you do well in otherwise bad time. If you lose your job you need a little debt as possible, if you have zero debt and a paid off house your expenses are food and heat - you could afford a large house (not a mansion) working minimum wage, which might happen in the worst cases.

If you know for sure inflation will be through the roof, but you will keep your job: then taking on more debt at a fixed low rate now, and investing in something that grows is the right thing. However this is risky. I can tell you what investments would have worked in the past, but it isn't hard to find historical advice that turned out bad. As such I would never recommend taking on more debt to invest even though the math seems to work. Though not paying off the house and instead investing in something else might be good advice.

Note that when those who retire early are surveyed most paid off the house early. Even though they know the math says index funds are a better investment, the peace of mind from not having dept is something they all say is important. In short the best financial advice isn't always the advice that works in practice. YMMV

Absolutely agree, the crash is coming since ten years.. Any moment.

I dont believe we will see a crash.

Stocks might go sideways for quit a while.

But companies will keep chugging along and employ people.

Companies which will do well, are companies, telling people the world will end...

> Stocks might go sideways for quit a while.

Nasdaq-100 is down 21.33% in 7 weeks. According to wikipedia a stock market crash is a decline "of over 10% in a stock market index over a period of several days".

DAX declined even sharper (-16.5% in 12 days; -24% from recent highs).

Just as a heads up: this is similar to the 1990's where Iraq invaded Kuwait. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 18% in three months, from 2,911.63 on July 3 to 2,381.99 on October 16,1990. This recession lasted approximately 8 months. This recession is listed as a "stock market crash" on wikipedia. [1]

IMO when something loses 1/5th of its value in such a short time it could be considered a crash.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Stock_market_crashes "Early 1990s recession"

DJIA is calculated using some unusual math on only 30 stocks and you should probably ignore it. It doesn't work the same way any other index does.
If you weren't just interested in derailing the conversation, you would have looked up how this stacks up with a better index. I did, so you might be cheered to know that the S&P 500, a cutting edge market-weight based broad index, dropped 20.2% from 1990-07-03 to 1990-10-11 compared to the DJIA's 18%.
Yes, but there's never any good reason to bring up DJIA unless you're a TV reporter who needs a big number, so I think it's always a good deed to complain about it.
Importantly, no one serious should use the djia as a proxy for a larger sample like the economy. The stock market already isn’t the entire economy and the djia is selected to not be representative of the stock market.
The DJIA selects a certain type of stock. Think more PG than TSLA.
DJIA was an important index in the before computer days (I guess up until the 1970s) when indexes were calculated by hand. Any reporter could calculate the DJIA in a few minutes and thus provide investors up to date information over the course of a day. Larger index like the S&P500 took long enough to calculate that by the time you did it the calculation was obsolete for news purposes - unless the market was closed. Thus DJIA would be reported hourly, while S&P500 was only calculated overnight.

Today we can update any index you might be interested in, in a few milliseconds. (I'm sure there are high frequency traders reading this who can give more accurate timings)

Speaking broadly, we've already had two economic recessions and I'm confident a third one is coming / underway; hopefully it won't affect individuals too much, but now would be the time to make sure to have a low-risk / risk-free rainy day fund, instead of having everything in stocks or whatever, in case you are without a job for a while for whatever reason.
You should probably buy some farmland, have a farm somewhere. Could combine it with working remotely as well.

That way, you will be more easily able to provide your family with food. Especially if both you and wife can do the farm work.

And perhaps, with the farm at some point you might be able to live without needing to work much.

Some inspiration can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T15gXm6ha_I

I'm going to push back very hard on the notion that it's easier to feed your family by picking up farming than by going to the supermarket.
Yup, if 'both you and your wife are doing farmwork' then who's got the time and energy to pursue a lucrative career? At least you could read about it on HN!
Especially with a young family to raise too.

A big polytunnel in the garden might make sense as a time-consuming hobby with practical benefits (though I still think it would be more expensive than just getting groceries), but not a farm.

Maintaining a farm doesn’t have to be a full-time job. Try to find a part-time job and it should be easily doable.
What country are you based in?

In mine (UK) one the biggest outgoing costs is energy, mainly heating. There are various government schemes to help people with recent bills and ways of reducing energy consumption.

The biggest outgoing cost? Are you sure? I would like to see figures for that.

I haven't checked the statistics but here in Portugal at least for me the biggest outgoing costs are rents (by a large margin), followed by food. Gas prices and car maintenance costs are also high, whereas public transport is roughly on a par with monthly energy costs.

Are people in the UK all heating their homes with electricity?

I'd edited my post as you replied. Agree, food generally costs more.

Mortgage/rent, highly variable depending on where you live, house big enough etc and if a mortgage, how many years are you able to spread it over.

Most UK homes are heated by gas. My recent bill went up 50% to £1500/y. Is expected to increase by 50% again this year.

I see, that makes more sense than your original post. I don't know about mortgage but rents should also be much higher than gas costs nearly everywhere. High rents combined with inadequate salaries seem to be the biggest problem in most industrialized countries.
The thing with mortgages (and rents) is they're highly variable across the country, I'm in one of the lowest paid regions of the UK and a town nearby can have 2-bedroom houses going for £60K. That could amount to ~£150/m repayments over 40 years. The same house in South East England may go for quadruple that.

Gas is also one of the main sources of electricity generation here.

Energy has by far outstripped inflation here over the past year.

I guess OP meant it's the biggest outgoing cost after rent and food. (Depending on area, council tax is also pretty high). It has gone up 2-3x in the last few months and now costs as much as food for some people.

Gas heating is common in the UK but a) it's being phased out for eco reasons b) gas has increased in price as well

If you own your own property, get a wood burning stove. The ability to heat your dwelling and cook food if the electricity goes out or you can't afford fuel is priceless.
Learn a useful skill. Fixing mechanical equipment, farming, building bunkers, preserving food without refrigeration. Teach your kids those things, and how to hide in the forest.
Buy house with few dozens of acres of land. Buy tools to cultivate the land. Buy few sacks of potatoes, learn how to grow them. Buy few sacks of salt, ensure it's stored safely. Learn how to weld with gas, buy enough gas to be stocked. Buy medicines. Buy guns. Buy bullets and vodkas. There are many thing to do to survive in harsh times. But first thing you need to ensure: your own home where you can live; defenses against strangers; preferably good community, you can't survive alone; ability to grow enough food; something that could be used as a currency: salt, bullets, vodka.

Also be ready to evacuate from the city when time will come. Move early, roads will be stuck very quickly. Keep your car tanks full, keep few cans of gasoline as well.

When nobody has money, the first thing governments will go after is land/houses, you can't move/hide them ;)

It is a mistake, gold is the only safe bet

Mate they'll go after your gold before they go after your land.
They can't go after something they don't even know you have.
They can make it illegal to privately hold gold. Wouldn’t be the first time in history. Good luck trading your gold for goods and services under these conditions.
I don’t think outlawing gold would stop the trading. Drugs are also illegal. Also in a crisis such as the one being discussed the laws and the concept of legality doesn’t mean much.

Btw it is estimated that the last time gold was declared illegal, only about 5% of gold owners gave it up.

But I can't eat gold. I'd rather have a homestead away from population centers than an equivalent in gold, because how likely - government takeover of your home - is that scenario? Where / when has that happened in the communities that HN people are active?

I mean it's happened to Russian oligarchs, but those were investments that they didn't even live in. It's happened to Palestinians, who live under an apartheid regime. But other than that, I can't recall anything like that happening. WW2 Europe maybe, for specific demographics.

What are you going to do with the gold? That's called bagholding, not a productive asset.

Actually, have you tried figuring out WHFIT taxes on $GLD? I ended up invested in it once and had no clue how you do it.

OP was asking about hard economic times, not doomsday.
Has there ever been a time in the last 100 years when this kind of model has been useful. I understand the attraction, but I can't imagine how we could end up in the kind of situation where what you describe would be useful, without say total nucular war, at which point what you describe isn't enough.
I mean, it might be useful in Ukraine right now.
I don't think it's useful if in the threat model there is also the risk to get a misplaced missile on your house. Yeah you can defend against some poor guy/group of guys looking for food/things, but that's about it.
To be fair though, a missile on your house isn't exactly the only threat in the model right now in Ukraine.
Indeed it isn't, but it's plausible enough to make that other plan useless anyway.
It does not protect you from being bombed to oblivion, or summarily shot by anybody with an ak-47 jealous of whatever you have, or raided by a military looking for food or entertainment, or expropriated in the unstable years ahead.

It might help if things don’t go too pear shaped, but this kind of event (a foreign invasion by a military with no regards for civilians) is basically game over regardless of your situation. The best outcome is you survive and rebuild.

If anything, Ukraine shows that civilization doesn't necessarily immediately collapse.

Despite the madness the only thing I learn about looting from Ukraine is:

- civilian would-be looters still getting punished

- Russian soldiers are looting

i.e. when your rations expired you get desperate and since the Russian army is armed and know they are an utter disgrace anyway this happens.

> If anything, Ukraine shows that civilization doesn't necessarily immediately collapse.

It’s been 20 days. I’d refrain from being overly optimistic just now. More likely than a full civilisation collapse is a return to feudal tribalism as in Afghanistan and Lybia, which is not very good either.

Where do you live? Some of the replies seems to be thinking you are living next to a oncoming zombie apocalypse.

What is your threat model?

Is it losing your savings to inflation? Having it taken away by a corrupt government?

Is it an invasion of the Russians?

Is it losing your job? Or the downfall of society to the point where nobody needs a programmer anymore?

Prepare for a recession/market crash? Diversify assets - property, bonds, shares, foreign and local, cash under bed.

Prepare for failure of government/war? Go be a "prepper" - Ie. have a few months worth of food and water stored. (not that hard in tins/pasta/rice). Get small solar panels for phone charging and a gas/wood camping stove. Download wikipedia.

In both cases, prepare to move countries. Often it's better to just leave than try to survive in subpar conditions. Beware that millions of others may be trying to do the same, and lots of governments don't like millions of refugees. Get yourself a passport for another country and you'll be far more likely to be let in.