It's a non-condom contraceptive. Are they more likely to contract HIV after using this due to an increase in unprotected sex or is it actually a part of the chemical process that increases HIV contraction even when using condoms.
It sounds like the latter, which is really bad if it's the case. My sister is involved in public health in Zambia and I have a message out to her for clarification. I hope she can offer some more information on the matter, but it's 6:45AM there right now.
The HIV pandemic is a complex multi-institutional problem that affects millions of people world-wide. It's an extremely complex system with real-world consequences, and therefore it is fascinating. If you don't think the story belongs on HN, vote other stories up.
From the guidelines:
"On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity."
4 comments
[ 0.21 ms ] story [ 19.0 ms ] threadFrom the guidelines:
"On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity."