What makes me extremely skeptical of "Web3" is the marketed nature of it. The terms "Web 1.0" and "Web 2.0" were never used at the time of their emergence; those labels were applied after the fact (or once things were well on their way to the mainstream).
I was all set to complain about this, but the wiki is pretty on point:
> Crypto Asset: A digital asset that is traded on a blockchain. Crypto assets have no use-value, no fundamental-value, and no income-cashflows and are a manifestation of the greater-fool-theory.
8 comments
[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 33.1 ms ] threadhttps://github.com/life-itself/web3
Or is this "Web3"? It all makes sense now.
> Crypto Asset: A digital asset that is traded on a blockchain. Crypto assets have no use-value, no fundamental-value, and no income-cashflows and are a manifestation of the greater-fool-theory.
From https://web3.lifeitself.us/concepts/cryptoasset. It also describes crypto assets as "libertarianism performance art".