Tell HN: Amazon's book search is gamed, keyword-stuffed, and inaccurate
I know this won't be new to most of you, but I wanted to share an anecdote (and a rant!)
I have a friend who has brain cancer. I went to Amazon searching for books on the subject and I typed ‘brain cancer’ in the search (books) field. What did I find?
Amazon UK
As you scroll down page 1 of the search results, you find examples of “brain cancer notebook” or “brain cancer journal”. Empty notebooks with nothing to do with the subject.
Amazon US
Same search term. The search results were even worse. The “no content” ranked even higher on the first page of search page.
Here is a screenshot of the search results for Amazon UK and US: https://i.postimg.cc/JRDkSGRK/amazon-book-search.jpg
Try an Amazon book search for “Ukraine war” on Amazon UK and US and already the search results are populated with “Ukraine war” blank notebooks seizing the opportunity to profit from war (these blank notebooks are not donating to charities, they are simply seizing on keyword searches).
The reason so many of these "no content" notebooks pollute the books category is because of Amazon’s Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP) service: a print-on-demand service. It has opened the flood gates to “low content” or “no content” journals and notebooks which allows "creators" publish hundreds of notebook titles. These are simply empty, lined or blank print-on-demand notebooks. Amazon includes these in book search results rather than confine these items to it’s own search category. You can find hundreds of YouTube videos on how to publish “no content” notebooks via KDP and how to game Amazon search results to rank higher.
I know Amazon simply doesn’t care, but I had to rant. I might be overreacting by the results I saw and I won’t be offended if you say so :-)
104 comments
[ 5.5 ms ] story [ 217 ms ] threadI have noticed Amazon's poor book search results too. If you search "fortran" in books you see some irrelevant content (the biography "When Fortran was Queen" is not what people are looking for) on the first page of 24 books, and the quality falls after that.
There would be probably be volunteers who could curate common Amazon book searches in their area of interest. I think this would help Amazon's sales, because I doubt that many people buy the dumb notebooks mentioned.
Can you link to your search?
The overhead for ad inventory is lower than for physical goods.
The margins are higher as well.
I still remember the good old times when ebay was mostly honest regular people selling used stuff online. Then "powersellers" appeared. Then things get automated. By now, e-bay is mostly new items but with horrible service and almost no safety checks.
That's also why GPU scalpers love both ebay and Amazon Marketplace.
So e-bay was crypto before crypto.
When I am looking for good deals on used stuff, I focus on lots of items, sorted by most recently listed. Always buy-it-now.
Maybe in 2030 I'll be able to buy an RX 6800 XT for MSRP.
There is NONE with Amazon.
There is zero chance that you will lose your money if you get scammed by someone into a bad product.
Everything else that people complain about is a function of selection vs curation: the more selection Amazon adds the more likely there is to be low-quality junk. I'm sure if they aggressively curated stuff, we'd see HackerNews stories get 1000 upvotes with headlines like "Amazon won't list my startup's products!" and people will be screaming about how it's not Amazon's job to censor or to curate, they should just be the "Everything Store", and let intelligent consumers like us decide.
In other words, do the job that a retailer should be doing.
Of course, Amazon does not want to be a low profit margin retailer, which is fine, but then it also deserves to be called a more expensive Aliexpress.
From what I've heard, PayPal aggressively sides with the buyer, to the point where there are all kinds of scams you can run as a buyer.
Also, the risk isn't zero. https://www.newsweek.com/man-buys-7000-camera-amazon-receive... There are others, but that's the one that stuck in my head.
> Everything else that people complain about is a function of selection vs curation: the more selection Amazon adds the more likely there is to be low-quality junk. I'm sure if they aggressively curated stuff, we'd see HackerNews stories get 1000 upvotes with headlines like "Amazon won't list my startup's products!" and people will be screaming about how it's not Amazon's job to censor or to curate, they should just be the "Everything Store", and let intelligent consumers like us decide.
This is an over-simplification of the issue. I don't mind that Amazon sells crappy products; I buy some of the crappy products because I only need them to work once or for a week.
What I do mind is their total lack of competence in stopping people from passing off shitty products as good ones. I don't even know where to start the complaints on that. Inventory comingling resulting in people getting fake products or even empty boxes. Recycling ASIN's resulting in a shitty product inheriting a good product's reviews, or even inheriting reviews from an entirely unrelated product. Allowing user reviews, and then doing such a poor job of policing them that they're actively unhelpful due to gaming them.
They're basically digitized Walmart, except they allow people to use their brand to pretend their cheap crap isn't cheap crap.
I'm at the point where I only buy from Amazon if I'm intending to buy cheap junk, because I don't feel like dealing with the hassle of figuring out which items are dropshipped at a 10x markup and which are legitimately worthwhile.
Everyone gets scammed on ebay and its also true of Amazon, you will get sold fake products on there and the search is getting worse and worse very quickly.
I think it's a search tool and not a browse/explore tool. You should already know which thing you want by the time you ask amazon to find it for you
I was recently searching Amazon for a specific classic Kindle book with the exact title, author and publisher (Penguin Classics) and still got a list of maybe 500 completely garbage versions that had obviously gamed the algorithm.
Even finally finding the “correct” version in the list, and clicking on that led me to a fake version of the book.
Sadly, the source of the company's bibliographic data at the time flattened the LoC 3-level heirarchy in a way that made it impossible (or at least very difficult) to recover, and I had to abandon the idea. I still think it would have been lovely.
This was the case for the front page results for S22 screen protectors when I was looking a few weeks ago. It's ridiculous that Amazon doesn't catch this.
My main problem is that there are no alternatives to buying ebooks. In terms of how easy it's to buy and transfer to the device.
For books and many other things you have to simply ignore five-star reviews because the few that aren't fake are kind of clueless ("product arrived quickly"). Often you need to ignore one-star reviews as well because they're packed by competitors and people who couldn't read the directions. There's far more actual information to be found in the middle/mixed ratings.
It's called unfluence to connotate the inversion of influence from social media ad networks, to individuals.
[0] https://unfluence.app
It isn't always the same "they", in fact I'd guess it isn't more often than not.
Sometimes a seller is shutting shop, and to make that last few pennies one of the assets they pass on is the account with products with good reviews. Another route to the same effect is apparently inactive accounts getting hacked. Maybe even active accounts, with the sterling reputation Amazon has for support it might be more hassle than it is worth for the hacked seller to do anything about it.
> It's ridiculous that Amazon doesn't catch this.
This comes under “sterling reputation Amazon has for support” when it comes to it being reported. And they have little incentive to deal with it if it isn't reported until there is a competitor that does it better and takes enough business for them to care – the inflated reviews improve sales of which they get a cut.
It’s not even for remotely equivalent products: my subscribe and save for cat litter was replaced with a birth control test under the same ASIN, after being unavailable for a few months!
i bought a wifi card on amazon and it came with a note mentioning a $20 amazon gift card if left them a good review. i reported it to amazon and nothing happened - i dont think they even responded.
i go elsewhere for reviews because amazons are so gamed and untrustworthy.
But yes, you're right. The short and sweet of it is that it's just a gamble getting anything you can't physically validate or verify upon receipt off of Amazon.
Searching for brain cancer returns a self-help book for dealing with cancer, academic publications for cancer diagnosis and a memoir of a brain cancer survivor.
I was always puzzled by the negative experiences that I usually see in HN because I have literally never had a bad experience with Amazon. Sure, a few shipments I received were damaged but they were promptly replaced with minimal hassle. I guess the difference is Amazon is still trying to capture market share in India while it's already established itself as a Behemoth in the US.
It could also be that there's no point in the notebook scalpers "publishing" in India because the amount "made" is so low. But a few sales in the USA could be worth it.
Yes.
> What happens if you search the same term in Hindi?
No results specifically about brain cancer, but books about the brain and books about cancer. Some of them are selling quack cures for cancer, which while concerning is nothing like what OP described
> I guess the difference is Amazon is still trying to capture market share in India while it's already established itself as a Behemoth in the US.
Yeah, and I think that affects this (positively) in two ways: (i) Amazon cares more about being seen as a legitimate player and not looking worse than the competition at this stage, (ii) it takes time for the scammers to find the best ways to game the platform, and they're still figuring it out.
I bet https://www.amazon.com/s?k=tree+of+life&i=stripbooks is basically what you get.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_of_life_(Kabbalah)
Try searching for a free public domain kindle ebook. You will have to scroll through pages of paid "special editions" which the "authors" have made no real changes to before you can find the free public domain copies.
Typing "brain cancer" (in plain english) yielded the same thing as your screenshot, expect there was an actual book about overcoming the chemo once cured.
Typing "cancer du cerveau" (en français dans le texte, literal translation of brain cancer) is even more a dumpster fire than what you describe, it's appalling... Here are the results in actual order:
What can I say... At least I got mostly books in the books section?It might be better now. It's still not great, and I still use search on Amazon's site with reluctance and mistrust.
Amazon.ca does not have this problem - search "brain cancer" under books and you get
1. BRAIN CANCER: Step By Step Guide On Everything You Need To Know About Brain Cancer Causes, Signs, Symptoms And Treatment
2. Fuck Brain Cancer : 2021 Planner: Schedule Organizer / Weekly Calendar
3. Glioblastoma - A guide for patients and loved ones: Your guide to glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma brain tumours
https://www.npr.org/2017/12/11/569815331/loving-and-hating-d...
https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/19/business/dollar-general-oppos...
I really wish amazon would charge $5/month/book you put up on KDP. It would eliminate a TON of garbage, and any half decent book would more than make up the $5/month to pay for itself.