BTC cannot die, it can only amass more users. You will see that the wishes of man or government are irrelevant. To kill Bitcoin, you would need to kill every human that runs a node.
Correct. It won't die. The pyramid ponzi scheme will just get larger and once everyone is in unrealized profit (another ATH) and start selling, the latecomers will remain hodling their life savings at a very high price.
Everyone knows that 'Bitcoin' is not useful as a currency but it is very useful as a ponzi scheme instead.
The market cap of Bitcoin is still small enough to be manipulated, and to swing wildly. For large trades you need massive liquidity, and Bitcoin’s liquidity can’t handle taking on all of Russian finance overnight - not to mention that no broker is likely ballsy enough to facilitate such a deal.
Nothing and they won't because bitcoin is not stable enough it can still be manipulated you still don't know if a giant amount of bitcoins are lost or just held by an unknown entity. No, sane central bank would ever adopt bitcoin. It might be a cryptocurrency in the future but it will not be bitcoin.
Basing your economy on a deflationary highly volatile hyper-speculative product, what can go wrong?
There are many types of cryptocurrencies and the only thing Bitcoin has got going for it is being one of the first, and the drawbacks many and well documented. An ad-hoc crypto with not as many shortcomings as Bitcoin would be better suited, if one really needs to go crypto.
> monetary sanctions because they are in EUR or USD
Yes, because that's what the contracts specified as a currency. Russia uses the ruble as a currency, which is not censored, it's just not 'in demand'. Adopting BTC how? Do you think Germany et al would be willing to pay for oil/gas in bitcoin when the contracts already specify a currency? Or adopt BTC internally? Like all the babushkas fighting in line for sugar would need to have crypto wallets now?
Also, wallets of Russians could be denied transactions.
Also, BTC is small enough to be manipulable by an alliance of state actors if push comes to shove.
10 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 33.5 ms ] threadEveryone knows that 'Bitcoin' is not useful as a currency but it is very useful as a ponzi scheme instead.
If they don’t do it, another country eventually will.
Wallets of known russian accounts could be tracked and made illegal to do business with, and the wallets those accounts touch.
There are many types of cryptocurrencies and the only thing Bitcoin has got going for it is being one of the first, and the drawbacks many and well documented. An ad-hoc crypto with not as many shortcomings as Bitcoin would be better suited, if one really needs to go crypto.
> monetary sanctions because they are in EUR or USD
Yes, because that's what the contracts specified as a currency. Russia uses the ruble as a currency, which is not censored, it's just not 'in demand'. Adopting BTC how? Do you think Germany et al would be willing to pay for oil/gas in bitcoin when the contracts already specify a currency? Or adopt BTC internally? Like all the babushkas fighting in line for sugar would need to have crypto wallets now?
Also, wallets of Russians could be denied transactions.
Also, BTC is small enough to be manipulable by an alliance of state actors if push comes to shove.