17 comments

[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 56.6 ms ] thread
This is really unhelpful for everyone but especially themselves. At some level, its arguable enforced savings (we have this, anyone in employment in australia has to contribute to retirement savings now on a defined minimum schedule) is needed.

The savings do disadvantage some people, its not a panacea. But it solves the primary problem for most people: Shit, i wish I'd started saving sooner.

I think this is a common feeling among adolescents and young adults across generations.

My grandparents spent their childhood with bombs falling around them. My parents spent their childhood doing duck-and-cover drills in school.

Betting on future disaster is a losing proposition, though. You could be right or wrong, and you'll lose either way.

Duck and cover drills were silly, and your grandparents knew that. They made jokes at the time about their nuclear-proof desks. It was always propaganda to make a nuclear war seem survivable, and fortunately they never had to find out.

Kids Today(tm) do active shooter drills. And those aren't useless. The news is full of kids who actually have to implement them for real. Most of them don't die, but it does mean that they have to live with the consequences of knowing that it's a genuine possibility.

On the other hand, 55% do.

But with savings accounts yielding sub-1%, I understand the hesitation.

As long as they’re paying their SS tax, we’re good.
Social Security they will never see a dime of.
Very famous study https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_marshmallow_experimen...

Delayed gratification is hard, believe me, had my Dad not literally screamed at me to sign up for the 401K when I was 24 and entering the workplace, too many years ago to admit... Well, I am glad I had a Dad that screamed at me.

It always seems like a bad time to invest. But, if past is prescient, it is always a good time to invest.

(comment deleted)
And then they complain that they are poor, that they can't buy a house, that the evil rich people TM are are keeping them down.

Ultimately it's all about personal responsibility, and the incentives being create to make the lack of said responsibility the "right" choice.

Eliminate all forms of welfare and let people starve to death on the streets, and after a few years where they go hungry they will start to consider the idea that perhaps they should begin saving something

> Eliminate all forms of welfare and let people starve to death on the streets, and after a few years where they go hungry they will start to consider the idea that perhaps they should begin saving something

Hoping I’m not breaking any rules by this. I know often the Hacker News Demographic can be very different compared to the general population. Especially the population that lives paycheck to paycheck without any means of the ability to save. So I want to be very clear here:

This is insane, Literally (in every essence of that word’s non-figurative meaning). Inhumane does not even begin to describe what this is.

> > Eliminate all forms of welfare and let people starve to death on the streets, and after a few years where they go hungry they will start to consider the idea that perhaps they should begin saving something

> Hoping I’m not breaking any rules by this. I know often the Hacker News Demographic can be very different compared to the general population. Especially the population that lives paycheck to paycheck without any means of the ability to save. So I want to be very clear here:

> This is insane, Literally (in every essence of that word’s non-figurative meaning). Inhumane does not even begin to describe what this is.

What's insane is the false belief that people cannot take care of themselves. This has never been the case in human history, and it is not the case now.

People live up to the expectations that are set for them, if you expect them to be children that will never take care of themselves, then that learned helplessness is what they will live up to.

If you expect people to take care of themselves, and you don't get in their way when they do so, then they will take care of themselves.

(comment deleted)
Surely, they would just group together then just take stuff from rich people?

The moral lesson, would be not to play unfair games.

Like they are doing right now by leveraging the power of the state?
Yes, but they would take more like 80% rather than the 10% they do today.
You understand that rich people are already being taxed more than 80% right now, right?