Just a note- that page is very mobile-unfriendly. The ingographic only fills half of my phone screen horizontally and they've somehow disabled zooming. I'm sure its very interesting but I couldn't.read it.
FWIW: It's making my netbook run slow and not loading well...etc. I thought I would try to find you a more mobile-friendly version but the entire site seems unfriendly, mobile or not.
The page rendered fine on my machine, but I closed it immediately because I hate infographics, or rather I hate "infographics" in the current vogue. It's just like reading any other superficial journalism, except with somebody screaming in your face the entire time.
Now excuse me, I'm off to compose an innovative four-axis plot showing how Edward Tufte will spin in his grave under various future scenarios.
Iphone belongs on the list, not Ipad. Ipad did not disrupt any market, it created one. Iphone on the other hand was nothing short of revolutionary for the mobile phone market.
Zynga is even worse. They are neither innovative nor disruptive, they simply monetize acquired games and clone others with the predictability of Hollywood B movies.
Did Netflix really jump from 15.9 million subscribers in 2010 to 25.6 million in June 2011? That's an increase of about 10 million subscribers in about a year, compared to an increase of 3.6 million between 2009-2010.
14 comments
[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 47.1 ms ] threadNow excuse me, I'm off to compose an innovative four-axis plot showing how Edward Tufte will spin in his grave under various future scenarios.
Here's the list of innovations, more details are on the source infographic: iPad Google Apps Skype Zynga Tata Nano Netflix Pandora
The Tata Nano, really? From what I understand it's having a fraction of the impact it was projected to have.
Zynga is even worse. They are neither innovative nor disruptive, they simply monetize acquired games and clone others with the predictability of Hollywood B movies.