Seems like a really cool gadget. The resulting pictures are really cool and remind of Google street view more than anything else. I wonder if some of the techniques Google used to stitch together street view pictures could also be used to improve the results from this camera...
This was a senior/masters project for some students. I am sure with more custom electronics you could fit the camera modules everything in something more baseball sized.
It seems like a small, cheap one might be a useful way to get a quick view of a 'hostile' environment; be that military, or some sort of dangerous physical environment.
Overall interesting idea but I would expect better quality from single device. Now it looks like that each camera is completely independent - at least it is very easy to see lines where photos are connected because of different amount of light captured.
This can be improved in the stitching software. The fact that you already know the position of every camera is a big advantage, so you can take shortcuts in the stitching. Right now the stitch is probably just a spherical projection with static image boundaries, based on the known camera angles. I see a bit of individual HDR effects to compensate for the small sensor's quality, but no blending or exposure correlation between the photos.
supplicate: to ask or beg for something earnestly or humbly
-- word of the day
Whereas a tripod 360 can't include the bass, won't all of these have a coy person directly below pretending to act natural like they didn't throw a ball straight up.
Check out the other projects on that page also, the Augmented Reality Bridge builder using a white board is really cool: http://jonaspfeil.de/arbridgebuilder
Here's what I am waiting for: The 360-degree 3D panorama video format. Videos are recorded by holding up the torch-like camera orb which records in every direction. You no longer just watch recordings; you explore them. On a traditional TV, besides the playback controls, you control the direction to watch at any point during playback using a simple remote control. But the real experience is wearing the VR helmet which, using head-tracking, enables you to watch in every direction during the recorded movie. You can pretty much go and re-experience your vacation, even seeing things you never saw while you were there in person.
How far are we from this being possible with current tech?
The greatest limiting factor to this becoming mainstream is the availability of cameras. Also, bandwidth and video capability is an issue: I can't download OR view 4k video on my still very capable 3 year-old macbook for example.
Now, Johnyzee I think mistakenly called it "360-degree 3d" actually, 360-degree images are 2-d, they are simply projected onto a spherical surface. They dont' however have any 3d information. Stereoscopic (i.e. "anaglyph, what people call 3-d, like what Avatar was) 360 video is another matter, and i don't think anyone has ever built that.
I think it ran for about a hundred thousand dollars a couple of years ago.
This is what motivated me to start working on a 360 StreetView video recording of Buenos Aires. I'm hoping to start it soon. My homemade rig is far more primitive, though you can get good quality levels if you Do It Yourself ™.
Disney shoots 360° movies (since the 1960s, I believe) using an array of 35mm cameras mounted on vehicles or suspended from aircraft and displays them in a round theater with handrails (which it recommends you hold onto because you'll fall over if you don't). I saw one of the resulting movies back in 1982 at Disneyland in Anaheim.
Very cool idea. Did you notice the patent pending? What's your thought on the patentability of this "idea".
I know when I first saw just the picture of the ball camera, my first thought was, "oh, if you throw the ball in the air you could take a 360 at the apex". I then read that is what they are doing.
So, does the patent satisfy the "non-obviousness" test? It certainly seems clever, but it also seems to me highly likely that this is neither novel nor non-obvious.
I think the non-obviousness part is calculating and taking the photos at the apex of the curve because I didn't immediately get that. Also, why 36 cameras (why not 20, or 72)? I think the bar for non-obviousness in patents is ridiculously low.
Available electronic components back then were way larger than what's available today: we could only fit a single CCD camera in the ball. It did send a real-time video stream, though.
Why does it have to be a throwable ball? I'd imagine a much better picture if I had the camera on an extendable stick. Perhaps offering both options. I also wish the stitching was better, Microsoft's Photosynth app does an amazing job. An option to be able to lock exposure may help the quality.
Mind is racing with possibilities of what this could do when combined with a water balloon slingshot. Wonder how waterproof and shockproof they have made it.
This would be great if you could tie it to a helium balloon and anchor it down with fishing line or the like. You could let it fly up 50 feet or so and capture some amazing images.
What I am looking forward to is a walkable sphere with a projection on the inside wall. You step in, walk in the direction you want to explore. Google street view would rock.
51 comments
[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 113 ms ] threadWhereas a tripod 360 can't include the bass, won't all of these have a coy person directly below pretending to act natural like they didn't throw a ball straight up.
Great little product though.
Or, maybe you can throw the ball in front of you even if nobody catches it: it looks pretty robust.
How far are we from this being possible with current tech?
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2010/01/world/haiti.360/index...
The greatest limiting factor to this becoming mainstream is the availability of cameras. Also, bandwidth and video capability is an issue: I can't download OR view 4k video on my still very capable 3 year-old macbook for example.
Now, Johnyzee I think mistakenly called it "360-degree 3d" actually, 360-degree images are 2-d, they are simply projected onto a spherical surface. They dont' however have any 3d information. Stereoscopic (i.e. "anaglyph, what people call 3-d, like what Avatar was) 360 video is another matter, and i don't think anyone has ever built that.
http://paulbourke.net/miscellaneous/stereographics/stereopan...
I think it ran for about a hundred thousand dollars a couple of years ago.
This is what motivated me to start working on a 360 StreetView video recording of Buenos Aires. I'm hoping to start it soon. My homemade rig is far more primitive, though you can get good quality levels if you Do It Yourself ™.
You could also check the Sony Bloggie with the 360 attachment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmPO_teTK6s
You get a doughnut that you can later unwrap, but the vertical resolution, 512px, is very limited for my personal taste/need.
Edit: FOV is crucial for the immersion. Its funny how the coral reef link I provided reminds me of Quake 3 with "cg_fov" > 110
What about throwing it of the Empire State Building or any cliff? It'd be like base jumping without the 'chute!
Man that would be trippy.
Probably THE most exciting toy I have seen in a long long time. Can't wait to get my hands on one.
I know when I first saw just the picture of the ball camera, my first thought was, "oh, if you throw the ball in the air you could take a 360 at the apex". I then read that is what they are doing.
So, does the patent satisfy the "non-obviousness" test? It certainly seems clever, but it also seems to me highly likely that this is neither novel nor non-obvious.
"Oh, that's obvious. At least once you show it to me."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_degree
Available electronic components back then were way larger than what's available today: we could only fit a single CCD camera in the ball. It did send a real-time video stream, though.
¹ - realistically the scan would have to operate too quickly to make a proper scan.
Please don't mod me down for my dreams.
They're not even difficult to build. Give me the budget for it and I'll have you a working prototype this weekend.
http://www.allosphere.ucsb.edu/