"a web crawler that indexes all apps available in any of the countries and regions which currently have an App Store, and verifies availability of these apps on each of these App Stores."
"So if an app is unavailable in one or more app stores, does it mean it has been censored by apple?
No. Unfortunately, no algorithm could ever detect censorship that easily, for the simple reason that censorship is a human decision that is invisible in the binary realm of the World Wide Web. What the ASM does is detect if an app is available somewhere but unavailable elsewhere."
> Ultimately, only by contacting the developer, can one confirm censorship.
Yeah I wish the website did this for every app listed, because claiming censorship if a developer temporarily removes an app in a region for language fixes or bugs makes it seem like a boy who cried wolf situation. At its current form it's more of a "is this app available in your region?" database.
They're also treating any app that's removed from sale as having been "censored" -- even though that includes apps which were removed by their own developer. (For example, it ends up including Facebook Lite, which Facebook discontinued in 2020.)
There's also a lot of apps listed under "Disappeared Apps" which look like legitimate removals for content issues, like scams or trademark infringement.
Why... why whoever made this page, would you choose to display a feedback modal right as first time visitors view your page? If collecting feedback is the most important thing you want someone to do make it front and center page content. And if it's not, then don't.
I was mildly curious about the site but upon seeing the modal it was an immediate back button click for me.
Whenever I see one of those on a site, I actually to the survey and fill it in with "it's annoying to be asked to do a survey before I even get to view the content." And hope that gets through to them.
At first I didn't see the survey, and then suddenly there it was. I had probably 60 full seconds to see the website.
Worst part is that it's a poor survey too. I couldn't even answer the final question because "Your comment uses an invalid format." It's possible it's because I put in some punctutation, so I took all that out. Still errored, so I thought maybe it was because the long form let me put in like 450 characters and I did, so I wrote a short one and still errored out.
Just terrible.
But I did fill out the survey. I don't know how to sound disappointed without it ending up as aggressive..
The reason to display a feedback modal is that the digital marketing establishment says they work. They even acknowledge that popups are annoying and can cost a few visitors.
I think even the most craven digital marketing executive would agree that it might make sense to give people a chance to see your content, before soliciting feedback… on your content.
For the project/mission: No specific comment. Good luck with whatever you are trying to do.
For the site: I get the design choice to try and draw inspiration/influence from apple.com but this instead comes across as almost like a phishing site. I recommend finding a healthier balance.
I am saddened by the acceptance of corporate censorship in the USA. The degree we are will to go to in order to score politically is shortsighted.
I have my political views, and wish everyone agreed with them. I even want my opponents to shut the hell up. But, I don't want them silenced by govt or corporate powers. Let the argument change my mind or theirs.
23 comments
[ 5.6 ms ] story [ 62.0 ms ] thread"a web crawler that indexes all apps available in any of the countries and regions which currently have an App Store, and verifies availability of these apps on each of these App Stores."
"So if an app is unavailable in one or more app stores, does it mean it has been censored by apple? No. Unfortunately, no algorithm could ever detect censorship that easily, for the simple reason that censorship is a human decision that is invisible in the binary realm of the World Wide Web. What the ASM does is detect if an app is available somewhere but unavailable elsewhere."
> Ultimately, only by contacting the developer, can one confirm censorship.
Yeah I wish the website did this for every app listed, because claiming censorship if a developer temporarily removes an app in a region for language fixes or bugs makes it seem like a boy who cried wolf situation. At its current form it's more of a "is this app available in your region?" database.
The puzzle app deleted locally had me scratching me head.
There's also a lot of apps listed under "Disappeared Apps" which look like legitimate removals for content issues, like scams or trademark infringement.
I was mildly curious about the site but upon seeing the modal it was an immediate back button click for me.
Worst part is that it's a poor survey too. I couldn't even answer the final question because "Your comment uses an invalid format." It's possible it's because I put in some punctutation, so I took all that out. Still errored, so I thought maybe it was because the long form let me put in like 450 characters and I did, so I wrote a short one and still errored out.
Just terrible.
But I did fill out the survey. I don't know how to sound disappointed without it ending up as aggressive..
For the site: I get the design choice to try and draw inspiration/influence from apple.com but this instead comes across as almost like a phishing site. I recommend finding a healthier balance.
I have my political views, and wish everyone agreed with them. I even want my opponents to shut the hell up. But, I don't want them silenced by govt or corporate powers. Let the argument change my mind or theirs.