HN Explorer

Ask HN: How to build a desktop app in 2022

50 points by picture_view ↗ HN
I have a personal project I’ve been working on that is a desktop app with a UI that has some fairly complex data visualizations.

I’ve been using Electron because I know JS well and can leverage D3.

The problem I’m facing is that I sometimes go for months without working on it, and it feels like everyone I start up I’m running into some dumb JS/TS/Electron ecosystem issue that takes me a few hours to debug (if I don’t just give up first.)

What are some good modern tools/frameworks for building native Desktop apps? Bonus points for cross-platform support.

37 comments

[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 90.8 ms ] thread
shams93
Take a look at qt
lampshades
Or gtk if you prefer Gnome.
smoldesu
I wouldn't recommend GTK until they figure out their text rendering issues (among other things). I've loved the library in the past, but it's pretty bad from a developer perspective these days.
solomatov
Electron is much better in my experience than most other cross platform toolkits. It gets better with troubleshooting as you use it more.
treeman79
Reminds of the old VB6 stuff from 90s. You know it’s screwed up. But your so productive in it you just don’t care.
KSPAtlas
I prefer not to think of electron as a toolkit, but as an embedded web browser.
aaaaaaaaata
Is there any Electron usecase that Tauri isn't better suited for?
solomatov
A big problem with Tauri is that it doesn't use the same browser everywhere. You should maintain support different browsers, with different version on different platform. With Electron it's a just fixed version of Chrome.
benibela
I use Lazarus

But it is not modern. It is like Delphi was 20 years ago

karmakaze
If I was going to try using something new it would be Flutter/Dart.

If I was going to use something (old) that might be Qt, or something that I know from way back straight up Java Swing. For something big a framework like Eclipse RCP. Should be able to use Kotlin for these now at least.

Snowworm
I don't understand the hype around Flutter for desktop. It's possible to make a cross platform app, but it only looks good for Android and iOS. I haven't used react native, but I imagine it would be better for cross platform apps because you could create a separate UI for mobile and web, but keep the same backend logic for both.
mhoad
That was true for a while but no longer. Not sure when you last tried it but maybe take a look here especially in the section of the readme where it has downloads for platform specific sample apps https://github.com/flutter/gallery
realusername
> I haven't used react native, but I imagine it would be better for cross platform apps because you could create a separate UI for mobile and web, but keep the same backend logic for both.

As far as I know, all react native gtk are abandonned so I would not be so sure about that, flutter does better in this area

cercatrova
> It's possible to make a cross platform app, but it only looks good for Android and iOS.

Why is that? Flutter is best suited towards owning your own UI and design language, and not relying on Android, iOS, Windows, macOS etc specific designs, like many companies these days (Spotify, Slack).

[deleted]
(comment deleted)
lazypenguin
The road is filled with dissatisfaction. I love desktop apps and developing at that layer but it’s clear that the segment has stagnated over the years.

QtWidgets - decent experience, lots of functionality out of the box. Rapid iteration is lackluster compared to web dev. Great docs. Less obvious “best practices”. Works well from C++ and Python. Distribution is annoying.

QML - Not much experience, didn’t attract me since less advanced widgets available.

Dear imgui- very fun to program using this lib. Can get decent visuals and functionality. Breath of fresh air to remove a layer of complexity. Start to miss some QoL features (animations, undo/redo, etc.). Low level, no docs (examples + reference docs), hard to style. C++ but has bindings in tons of languages.

WPF - decently powerful. Kind of stagnated and windows only. Can still produce solid UI. C#

Alternatives: Godot, Webview2, GTK, fltk

mikewarot
Lazarus is a cross platform and open source GUI builder based on Free Pascal. If you can handle begin and end instead of { }, you'll get used to it fairly quickly. As a bonus, it does strings that you never have to allocate or deallocate, and can handle a gigabyte of data.

I've run Lazarus on a Raspberry Pi Zero W (the old one), Linux, and Windows.

thijsvandien
As much as I like Lazarus, I wouldn't recommend it for complex data visualizations by someone skilled in web tech.
0x20cowboy
If you want to keep with the browser based rendering, I've used this for a couple side / internal projects: https://github.com/webview/webview

Works quite well for normal things, but 3d webgl stuff can go a bit haywire.

mhoad
Flutter is the most obvious answer here to me.

Very modern, cross platform (windows, mac, linux, fuchsia, iOS, android, web and embedded devices), excellent tooling / developer experience, outputs to native compiled code, battle tested in a lot of real world scenarios against billions of dollars in revenue like Google’s Ads apps for example.

On desktop specifically, Ubuntu last year or two said they were going all in on providing first class Flutter support on Linux and would be using it as their new default for their own desktop apps starting with the installer in the recently released Ubuntu 22.04 (repo link here https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-desktop-installer)

Should be simple to pick up if you have a JS or even better good TS experience.

https://flutter.dev/ also here is a good charting library to get you started https://github.com/google/charts

Ambolia
How is the responsivity of the UI? I found that all web based UIs have weird delays, like you start writing text and the first couple of letters get lost, or weird delays on pressing buttons that 90s native UIs never had.
mhoad
Web support is early days at the moment and right now but you can take a look here https://gallery.flutter.dev/ to see for yourself where it’s at.

I’ve seen hints of the medium term plan however which is AFAIK move from optimised JS to WASM, bring in WebGPU support, use faster canvas based rendering (rather than DOM although both are supported) and rewrite the rendering engine which is currently happening here https://github.com/flutter/engine/tree/main/impeller

I don’t suspect those problems will remain on web for very long, that looks like a very credible path to push out great native level performance on web as well to me.

pjmlp
I would go for whatever is native on each platform (on Windows, WPF is still the best way, ignore anything WinRT/UWP related), as what bonus points are concerned, Qt would be my answer.

If staying with Web stack is relevant, then PWAs.

viraptor
If you're ok with electron's size, then you could look at dotnet + avaloniaui. WPF-like and very portable, desktop and mobile. http://avaloniaui.net/

I'm mentioning the size because dotnet itself will take some space unless some other app already installed it. Or you can try native compilation with it.

Shadonototra
no wonder desktop apps sucks, look at the suggestion people are making in the replies... i am concerned, ashamed, and very sad
mikewarot
What kind of visualization are you talking about? Charts, ray tracing, video?
cpach
Do you want to support all of Windows, Linux and macOS? If so, maybe QT? If not, you have some other options. E.g. macOS has it’s own proprietary libraries you can target.
farseer
If you are using electron for cross-platform, consider that you are already on the right track from the available options. Everything else is much worse.
epirogov
I wrote my desktop app in this winter with WinUI 3 Project Reunion in hope it will be available on linux soon. Currently this supperior project with large list on anccestors WPF, UWP and Xamarin can be compiled to Windows, MacOs and Android without any code and layout changes.