These are all metrics around driving habits, not about outcomes.
"Safer" is an adjective of outcomes and potential outcomes, neither of which this article correlates with habits or demographics.
Not to mention that there's zero information about how any of this is measured or how they control for sensor calibration, phone placement, phone capability etc...
Probably that iPhone users are more into social media fashion, which they check more regularly.
It's not about the phone, it's about why they chose the particular phone in the first place. iPhones are deemed more valuable by many people, hence have a more importance in people's lives, hence more usage. Probably something around those lines.
Zero substance, zero data gathering methodology, zero statistical deviation controlling methods (we know that real-time GPS isn't always precise), and as another commenter pointed out: no outcome measurement, just supposed driving habits.
Well okay, maybe that really supports the conclusion in the title but it's not clear how.
8 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 30.1 ms ] thread"Safer" is an adjective of outcomes and potential outcomes, neither of which this article correlates with habits or demographics.
Not to mention that there's zero information about how any of this is measured or how they control for sensor calibration, phone placement, phone capability etc...
signed, android user
It's not about the phone, it's about why they chose the particular phone in the first place. iPhones are deemed more valuable by many people, hence have a more importance in people's lives, hence more usage. Probably something around those lines.
Zero substance, zero data gathering methodology, zero statistical deviation controlling methods (we know that real-time GPS isn't always precise), and as another commenter pointed out: no outcome measurement, just supposed driving habits.
Well okay, maybe that really supports the conclusion in the title but it's not clear how.