> Musk said his opposition to permanent bans doesn't mean that Twitter under his ownership would never issue suspensions or delete tweets. "That doesn't mean they get to say whatever they want to say," Musk said. "If they say something that is illegal or otherwise just destructive to the world, there should be perhaps a timeout, a temporary suspension, or that particular tweet should be made invisible or have very limited traction. But I think permanent bans just fundamentally undermine trust in Twitter as a town square where everyone can voice their opinion."
Elon Musk: free speech warrior against perma-bans, but for shadow bans, temp-bans, throttling, and selective censorship.
>illegal or otherwise just destructive to the world
Emphasis mine, that word "or" is pretty important. In this context, it means that twitter will remove things they are not compelled to by law as long as they (twitter) feels that the statement is sufficiently "destructive" (whatever that means)
5 comments
[ 7.6 ms ] story [ 146 ms ] threadElon Musk: free speech warrior against perma-bans, but for shadow bans, temp-bans, throttling, and selective censorship.
Emphasis mine, that word "or" is pretty important. In this context, it means that twitter will remove things they are not compelled to by law as long as they (twitter) feels that the statement is sufficiently "destructive" (whatever that means)